Group work as an arena for learning in STEM education: negotiations of epistemic relationships

References

• Cekaite, A. (2006). Getting started. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (2006). Editor’s introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Conversation analysis volume 1: Turn-taking and repair (pp. XXI–XXXVII). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2012). Conversation analysis in the classroom. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 593–611). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 8–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2012). The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 57–76). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In M. J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (Vol. 13, pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 370–394). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2013). Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 551–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2018). The ubiquity of epistemics: A rebuttal to the ‘epistemics of epistemics’ group. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 14–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Haugaløkken, O. K., & Aakervik, A. O. (2006). Samarbeid I skolen - pedagogisk utviklingsarbeid, samspill mellom mennesker. 4utg. Namsos: Pedagogisk Psykologisk Forlag AS.
   Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L., & Piirainen- Marsh, A. (2013). Manual guiding in peer group interaction: A resource for organizing a practical classroom task. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46(4), 322–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-A. (2010). Learning in the contingency of talk-in-interaction. Text & Talk, 30(4), 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilja, N. (2014). Partial repetitions as other-initiations of repair in second language talk: Re-establishing understanding and doing learning. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 98–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melander, H. (2012). Transformations of knowledge within a peer group. Knowing and learning in interaction. Learning. Culture and Social Interaction, 1(3–4), 232–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melander, H., & Sahlström, F. (2010). Lärande i interaktion. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., & Frøyland, M. (2016). Undervisning i naturfag. I O. K. Bergem, H. Kaarstein, & T. Nilsen ( red.), Vi kan lykkes med realfag. Resultater og analyser fra TIMSS 2015. I (pp. 137–157). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzza, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseth, C. J., Pellegrini, A. D., Bohn, C. M., Van Ryzin, M., & Vance, N. (2007). Preschoolers’ aggression, affiliation, and social dominance relationships: An observational, longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology, 45(5), 479–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusk, F. (2016). Doing second language learning: A CA study of learning practices in Finnish-Swedish bilingual educational settings (Unpublished Doctor), Åbo Akademi University, Vasa.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, F., Pörn, M., & Sahlström, F. (2016). The management of dynamic epistemic relationships regarding second language knowledge in second language education: Epistemic discrepancies and epistemic (im)balance. Classroom Discourse, 7(2), 184–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusk, F., Pörn, M., Sahlström, F., & Slotte-Lüttge, A. (2014). Perspectives on using video recordings in conversation analytical studies on learning in interaction. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusk, F., Sahlström, F., & Pörn, M. (2017). Initiating and carrying out L2 instruction by asking known-answer questions: Incongruent interrogative-practices in bi- and multilingual peer interaction. Linguistics and Education, 38, 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlström, F. (2008). Från lärare till elever, från undervisning till lärande: Utvecklingslinjer i svensk, nordisk och internationell klassrumsforskning (Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie; Nro 9). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström, F. (2011). Learning as social action. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (Vol. 3, pp. 43–62). Bristol Buffalo Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Naivete vs sophistication or discipline vs self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig. Discourse and Society, 10, 577–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1093/OBO_dataset_home
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2012). Basic conversation analytic methods. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The hand- book of conversation analysis (pp. 77–99). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 785–791.
   Google Scholar
• Sporer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students’ reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19, 272–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, M., & Sahlström, F. (2017). Same and different: Epistemic topicalizations as resources for cohesion and change in classroom learning trajectories. Discourse Processes, 55(8), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (2008). Learning in small groups. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (pp. 203–211). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar