Predicting Finnish subject-teachers’ ICT use in Home Economics based on teacher- and school-level factors

References

• Akenji, L., Bengtsson, M., Briggs, E., Chiu, A., Daconto, G., Fadeeva, Z.,Fotiou, S, Gandhi R, Mathews C, Metternicht G, ... & Tabucanon, M.  (2015). Sustainable consumption and production: A handbook for policymakers. United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1951Sustainable%20Consumption.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Almerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & Díaz-García, I. (2016). Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers & Education, 100(2016), 110–125.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. E., Brese, F., Chow, A., Law, N., Malak-Minkiewicz, B., Monseur, C.,Plomp T & Zuehlke O. (2006). Second information technology in education study: SITES 2006 technical report. R. Carsten & W. Pelgrum (ed. by). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
   Google Scholar
• Bergdahl, N., Fors, U., Hernwall, P., & Knutsson, O. (2018). The use of learning technologies and student engagement in learning activities. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(2), 113–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Osorio, B., & Pedró, F. (2009). A conceptual framework for benchmarking the use and assessing the impact of digital learning resources in school education. In F. Scheuermann & F. Pedró (Eds.), Assessing the effects of ICT in education: Indicators, criteria and benchmarks for international comparisons (pp. 107–118). Luxembourg: OECD, European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Brečko, B., & Ferrari, A. (2016). The digital competence framework for consumers. R. Vuorikari & Y. Punie (ed. by). Luxembourg: European Union. doi:10.2791/838886
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casimir, G. (2011). Interaction of societal development and communication technology. International Journal of Home Economics, 4(1), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., & Gemo, M. (2018). Young children (0–8) and digital technology: A qualitative study across Europe. European union. doi:10.2760/294383
   Google Scholar
• Comi, S. L., Argentin, G., Gui, M., Origo, F., & Pagani, L. (2017). Is it the way they use it? Teachers, ICT and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 56, 24–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council recommendation of 22 may 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (2018/C189/01). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation). Sloan School of Management. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Drossel, K., Eickelmann, B., & Gerick, J. (2017). Predictors of teachers’ use of ICT in school: The relevance of school characteristics, teachers’ attitudes and teacher collaboration. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 551–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elorinne, A.-L., Arai, N., & Autio, M. (2017). Pedagogics in Home Economics meet everyday life. Crossing boundaries and developing insight in Finland and Japan. Bright prospects for active schools. In E. Kimonen & R. Nevalainen (Eds.), Reforming teaching and teacher education (pp. 145–168). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Erixon P-O. (2009). School subject paradigms and teaching practice in lower secondary Swedish schools influenced by ICT and media. Computers & Education 54(4): 1212–1221. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge,confidence, beliefs and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–285.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: A European Consumer Agenda–Boosting confidence and growth. Brussels: Author. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2019/EN/COM-2019-198-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Survey of schools: ICT in education. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/survey-schools-ict-education
   Google Scholar
• European Schoolnet and University of Liége. (2012). Survey of schools: ICT in education. Country profile: Finland. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/image/document/2018-3/finland_country_profile_2F95B00C-C5E5-C4E9-B37C237CD55B0AD0_49435.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2018a). Digital economy and society statistics: Households and individuals. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Digital_economy_and_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2018b). E-commerce statistics for individuals. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/E-commerce_statistics_for_individuals
   Google Scholar
• Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. (2012). Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. (2014). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Helsinki, Finland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. (2000). The role of theory in HIV prevention. AIDS Care,12(3): 273–278. doi:10.1080/09540120050042918.
   Google Scholar
• Fransson, G., Lindberg, O. J., & Olofsson, A. D. (2018). From a student perspective, what constitutes a good (or less good) use of ICT in teaching? Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2155–2177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A., & Sanders, M. (2017). Evaluating the potential of teacher-designed technology -based tasks for meaningful learning: Identifying needs for professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2871–2895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerick, J., Eickelmann, B., & Bos, W. (2017). School-level predictors for the use of ICT in schools and students’ CIL in international comparison. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 5(5). doi:10.1186/s40536-017-0037-7
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, -J.-J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisslevik, E., Wernersson, I., & Larsson, C. (2017). Teaching sustainable food consumption in Swedish Home Economics: A case study. International Journal of Home Economics, 10(2), 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson Lindqvist, M. (2015). Gaining and sustaining TEL in a 1:1 laptop initiative: Possibilities and challenges for teachers and students. Computers in the Schools, 32(1), 35–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden, A., Hall, S., & Pucciarelli, D. (2018). US FCS professionals’ perceptions of the current and future direction of family and consumer sciences as a discipline. International Journal of Home Economics, 11(1), 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hatlevik, I. K. R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(935). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Examining the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, their digital competence, strategies to evaluate information, and use of ICT at school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 555–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydn, T. (2014). How do you get pre-service teachers to become ´good at ICT´ in their subject teaching? The views of expert practioners. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(4), 455–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernándes-Ramos, J. P., Martínez-Abad, F., García Peñalvo, F. J., Herrera García, M. E., & Rodríguez-Conde, M. J. (2014). Teachers’ attitude regarding use of ICT. A factor reliability and validity study. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 509–516.
   Google Scholar
• Hietikko, P., Ilves, V., & Salo, J. (2016). Askelmerkit digiloikkaan. Opetusalan Ammattijärjestö. Retrieved from https://www.oaj.fi/globalassets/julkaisut/2016/askelmerkitdigiloikkaan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hölttä, M. (2014). Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka kotitalousopetuksessa [Information- and communication technology in Home Economics]. In H. Kuusisaari & L. Käyhkö (Eds.), Tutki, kehitä, kehity: Kotitalous yhteiskunnallisena oppiaineena [Explore, develop, develop: Home Economics as a social school subject] (pp. 67–78). Helsinki, Finland: BoD-Books on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, S., Chan, A., Mozejko, A., & Caputi, P. (2015). Technology practices: Confirmatory factor analysis and exploration of teachers’ technology integration in subject areas. Computers & Education, 90, 24–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S. W. (2012). Reading statistics and research. Boston: Pearson International Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Ibieta, A., Hinostroza, E., Labbé, C., & Claro, M. (2017). The role of the internet in teachers’ professional practice: Activities and factors associated with teacher use of ICT inside and outside the classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 425–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFHE Think Tank Committee. (2013). Rebranding Home Economics. International Journal of Home Economics, 6(2), 186–206.
   Google Scholar
• Ilomäki, L., & Lakkala, M. (2018). Digital technology and practices for school improvement: Innovative digital school model. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(25). doi:10.1186/s41039-018-0094-8
   Google Scholar
• Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence: An emergent boundary concept for educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. Æ. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of Home Economics. (2008). IFHE position statement: Home Economics in the 21st century. International Federation for Home Economics. Retrieved from https://www.ifhe.org/publications/ifhe-special-publications/ifhe-position-statement-on-home-economics/
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2016). Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: Adding pedagogy as a new model construct. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Vermeulen, M., Kirschner, P. A., van Buuren, H., & Van Acker, F. (2013). Adopting the integrative model of behaviour prediction to explain teachers’ willingness to use ICT: A perspective for research on teachers’ ICT usage in pedagogical practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(1), 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, T. (2014). Opettajat Suomessa 2013. Koulutuksen seurantaraportit 2014 [Teachers in Finland 2013. A follow up report for education]. Tampere: Finnish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, O. J., & Olofsson, A. D. (2017). ”Same but different? An examination of Swedish upper secondary school teachers’ and students’ views and use of ICT in education”. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(2), 122–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Innovating education and educating for innovation: The power of digital technologies and skills. Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264265097-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world: The OECD PISA global competence framework. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parastoo, P., Nasrin Razavian, Z., & Behrooz, Y. (2016). Children as consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(5), 509–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendergast, D. (2006). Sustaining the Home Economics profession in new times – A convergent moment. In A.-L. Rauma, S. Pöllänen, & P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen (Eds.), Human perspectives in sustainable future (pp. 3–39). Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
   Google Scholar
• Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical belief and their use of digital media in classroom: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351–1359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, T. (2010). Fundamentals of Applied Sampling. In Handbook of survey research (ed. by P. Marsden, and J. Wright), pp. 138–167. Emerald, Bingley, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning (2006/962/EC). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32006H0962
   Google Scholar
• Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, M., & Punie, Y. (2010). Learning 2.0. The impact of Web 2.0 innovations of education and training in Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/learning-20-impact-web-20-innovations-education-and-training-europe
   Google Scholar
• Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/european-framework-digital-competence-educators-digcompedu
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Boston, MA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M. V. (2000). The postmodern perspective on home economics history. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 92(1), 81–84.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In Handbook of research on teacher education (ed. by J. Sikula), pp. 102–119. Macmillan. New York, US.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific. Measuring and modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 88, 202–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipilä, K. (2014). Educational use of information and communications technology: Teachers’ perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 225–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statsrådets förordning om riksomfattande mål för utbildningen enligt lagen om grundläggande utbildning och om timfördelning i den grundläggande utbildningen (422/2912). Retrieved from https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2012/20120422
   Google Scholar
• Sue, V. & Ritter, L. (2012). Conducting online surveys. Sage, Los Angeles, US.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, K., Korhonen, J., & Eklund, G. (in review process). Finnish subject-teachers’ beliefs and use of ICT in Home Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Sysiharju, A.-L. (1995). Naisasian tytär-muuttuvien kotien tuki 1891–1990. Vuosisata kotitalousopettajien koulutusta Helsingissä [A daughter of the women’s rights movement – Support for homes in constant change. A century of the education of Home Economics teachers in Helsinki]. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, The Department of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanhua-Piiroinen, E., Viteli, J., Syvänen, A., Vuori, J., Hintikka, K., & Sairanen, H. (2016). Perusopetuksen oppimisympäristöjen digitalisaation nykytilanne ja opettajien valmiudet hyödyntää digitaalisia oppimisympäristöjä [The current state of digitalisation of learning environments in basic education and teachers’ ability to take advantage of digital learning environments]. Publications of the Government’s analysis, assessment and research activities 18/2016. Prime Minister’s Office. Retrieved from http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/79573/perusopetuksen%20oppimisymp%C3%A4rist%C3%B6jen%20digitalisaation%20nykytilanne.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• TemaNord. (2010). Teaching consumer competences: A strategy for consumer education. Proposals of objectives and content of consumer education. Nordic-Estonian Consumer Education Working Group. Retrieved from https://www.kkv.fi/globalassets/kkv-suomi/opettajalle/julkaisut/en/temanord-2010568_with-the-appendix_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2012). Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: An integration of the technology model and theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(1), 2–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2018). Students and teachers intention to use technology: Assessing their measurement equivalence and structural invariance. Journal of Educational Computing, 57(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Turkki, K. (2008). Home Economics: A dynamic tool for creating a sustainable future. International Journal of Home Economics, 1(1), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2018). Building tomorrow’s digital skills: What conclusions can we draw from international comparative indicators? France, Paris: Author. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261853
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2019). ICT in education. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/themes/icteducation
   Google Scholar
• Valencia-Molina, T., Serna-Collazos, A., Ochoa-Angrino, S., Caicedo-Tamayo, A. M., Montes González, J. A., & Chávez-Vescance, J. D. (2016). ICT standards and competencies from the pedagogical dimension: A perspective from levels of ICT adoption in teachers’ education practice. Colombia: Unesco, Pontifica Universidad Javeriana.
   Google Scholar
• van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 407–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veeber, E., Taar, J., Paas, K., & Lind, E. (2017). Handicraft and Home Economics teachers’ understanding of the possibilities of ICT usage in their practice. In V. Dislere (Ed.), Rural environment education personality: Report from the conference 12.5–13.5.2017 (pp. 400–407). Latvia.
   Google Scholar
• Venäläinen, S., & Metsämuuronen, J. (2015). Arjen tiedot ja taidot hyvinvoinnin perustana. Kotitalouden oppimistulokset perusopetuksen päättövaiheessa 2014 [Everyday life skills and skills as basis for well-being. Learning outcomes in Home Economics at the final stage of basic education 2014]. Helsinki: The Finnish Education Evaluation Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E., & Monseur, C. (2013). The use of ICT in education: A survey of schools in Europe. In European journal of education 48(1): 11–27. Oxford, Malden: Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.2307/23357043.
   Google Scholar
• Wikan, G., & Molster, T. (2011). Norwegian secondary school teachers and ICT. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar