Transitions through remodelling teaching and learning environments

References

• Al Horr, Y., Arif, M., Katafygiotou, M., Mazroei, A., Kaushik, A., & Elsarrag, E. (2016). Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Alterator, S., & Deed, C. (2013). Teacher adaptation to open learning spaces. Issues in Educational Research.Issues in Educational Research, 23(3), 315 -330.
   Google Scholar
• Alterator, S., & Deed, C. (2018). School space and its occupation. Boston: Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy : Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Davies, D. F., & Barrett, D. L. (2015). Clever Classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.salford.ac.uk/cleverclassrooms/1503-Salford-Uni-Report-DIGITAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J., & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes. State of Victoria, Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bøjer, B. (2019). Unlocking learning spaces: An examination of the interplay between the design of learning spaces and pedagogical practices. Copenhagen: KADK: The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbeer, C., Mahat, M., Byers, T., & Imms, W. (2019). A systematic review of the effects of innovative learning environments on from: Teacher mind frames. Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.iletc.com.au/publications/reports
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2014). Making the case for space: The effect of learning spaces on teaching and learning. Curriculum and Teaching, 29(1), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Byers, T., Mahat, M., Liu, K., Knock, A., & Imms, W. (2018). Systematic review of the effects of learning environments on student learning outcomes. Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.iletc.com.au/publications/reports
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2018a). Framing learning entanglement in innovative learning spaces: Connecting theory, design and practice. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1120–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2018a). A typology of agency in new generation learning environments: Emerging relational, ecological and new material considerations. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 26(1), 51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2018b). “Professional learning on steroids”: Implications for teacher learning through spatialised practice in new generation learning environments. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(12), 12–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2019). Dimensions of agency in new generation learning spaces: Developing assessment capability. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(7), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., Smardon, D., & Nelson, E. (2017). Innovative learning environments and new materialism: A conjunctural analysis of pedagogic spaces. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 808–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., Smardon, D., & Page, A. (2017). Spatialised practices in ILEs: Pedagogical transformations and learner agency. Transforming Education: Design & Governance in Global Contexts. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5678-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, B. (2016). Addressing the spatial to catalyse socio-pedagogical reform in middle years education. In The translational design of schools (pp. 27–49). Rotterdam: Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Dane, J. (2016). The effective teaching and learning spatial framework. In W. Imms, B. Cleveland, & K. Fisher (Eds.), Learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge (pp. 211–228). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., Tse, H. M., Stables, A., & Cox, S. (2017). Design as a social practice: The design of new build schools. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 767–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Laval, S. (2014). Gåturer: Metod för dialog och analys. Stockholm: Svensk byggtjänst.
   Google Scholar
• de Laval, S., Frelin, A., & Grannäs, J. (2019). Ifous fokuserar: Skolmiljöer - Utvärdering och erfarenhetsåterföring i fysisk skolmiljö. Stockholm: Ifous rapportserie.
   Google Scholar
• Deed, C., & Lesko, T. (2015). ‘Unwalling’ the classroom: Teacher reaction and adaptation. Learning Environments Research, 18(2), 217–231.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frelin, A., & Grannäs, J. (2014). Studying relational spaces in secondary school: Applying a spatial framework for the study of borderlands and relational work in school improvement processes. Improving Schools, 17(2), 135–147.
   Google Scholar
• French, R., Imms, W., & Mahat, M. (2019). Case studies on the transition from traditional classrooms to innovative learning environments: Emerging strategies for success. Improving Schools, Online Fir, 1–15. doi:10.1177/1365480219894408
   Google Scholar
• Gislason, N. (2010). Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. Learning Environments Research, 13(2), 127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Gislason, N. (2018). The whole school Planning and evaluating innovative middle and secondary schools. In S. Alterator & C. Deed (Eds.), School space and its occupation: Conceptualizing and evaluating innovative learning environments.  (pp. 187–201). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grannäs, J., & Frelin, A. (2017a). Highlighting education support professionals’ indirect contributions to the educational environment. Nordic Studies in Education, 37(3–4), 217–230.
   Google Scholar
• Grannäs, J., & Frelin, A. (2017b). Spaces of student support – Comparing educational environments from two time periods. Improving Schools, 20(2), 127–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms, W., Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2016). Evaluating learning environments snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jennifer Charteris, Dianne Smardon & Emily Nelson (2017) Innovative learning environments and new materialism: A conjunctural analysis of pedagogic spaces, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 808–821, doi:10.1080/00131857.2017.1298035
   Google Scholar
• Jerkø, S., & Homb, A. (2009). Prosjektrapport nr. 43. Planløsning, akustikk og støy i baseskoler. Oslo: SINTEF Byggforsk.
   Google Scholar
• Lackney, J. A. (2008). Teacher environmental competence in elementary school environments. Children, Youth and Environments, 18(2), 133–159. http://www.colorado.edu/journals/cye
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, V., & Byers, T. (2020). All innovative learning environments have one factor in common: A spatially active teache. Australian Educational Leader, 42(1), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, V., Mow, L., Edwards, D., Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2014). No title. In Prain (Ed.), Adapting to teaching and learning in open-plan schools (pp. 107–123). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mahat, M., Bradbeer, C., Byers, T., & Imms, W. (2018). Innovative learning environments and teacher change: Defining key concepts. Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.iletc.com.au/publications/reports
   Google Scholar
• Meland, A. T. (2015). Læreres erfaring med en transparent arkitektur. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 99(5), 375–386.
   Google Scholar
• Melhuish, C. (2011). Methods for understanding the relationships between learning and space. In A. Boddington & J. Boys (Eds.), Re-shaping learning: A critical reader: The future of learning spaces in post-compulsory education (pp. 19–31). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, T. (2002). Flexible space and built pedagogy. Inventio, 4(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (2016). Policy matters: De/re/territorialising spaces of learning in Victorian government schools. Journal of Education Policy, 31(1), 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 23(4), 575–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, P., & Fielding, R. (2005). The language of school design: Design patterns for 21st century schools. Minneapolis: DesignShare.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). 21st century learning environments. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Innovative learning environments. Author. doi:10.1787/9789264203488-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). The OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. Author. doi:10.1787/9789264277274-en
   Google Scholar
• Saltmarsh, S., Chapman, A., Campbell, M., & Drew, C. (2015). Putting “structure within the space”: Spatially un/responsive pedagogic practices in open-plan learning environments. Educational Review, 67(3), 315–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, B. N., & Hannafin, R. D. (2000). How teachers and parents view classroom learning environments: An exploratory study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(3), 401–416.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2015). The futures of learning 3: What king of pedagogies for the 21st century? Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurðardóttir, A. K., & Hjartarson, T. (2016). The idea and reality of an innovative school: From inventive design to established practice in a new school building. Improving Schools, 19(1), 62–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soccio, P. (2016). A new post occupancy evaluation toll for assessing the indoor environment quality of learning environments. In W. Imms, B. Cleveland, & K. Fisher (Eds.), Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge (pp. 194–210). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. (G. Steiner-Khamsi, Ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vinje, E. (2014). De norske baseskolene: En kritisk analyse av diskurser og argumenter tilknyttet debatten rundt, og utbyggingen av, de norske baseskolene. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. (2014). Making space to learn: Leading collaborative classroom design. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. (2019). Built policy: School-building and architecture as policy instrument. Journal of Education Policy. doi:10.1080/02680939.2019.1578901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, K. (2016). Re-placing flexibility. Flexibility in learning spaces and learning. In K. Fisher (Ed.), The translational design of schools (pp. 51–82). London: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner, P., McCarter, S., Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2012). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice? Improving Schools, 15(1), 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner, P., Thomas, U., & Tiplady, L. (2018). Structural change from physical foundations: The role of the environment in enacting school change. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar