1,895
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The demise of active learning even before its implementation? Instructors’ understandings and application of this approach within Japanese higher education

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aburatani, H., Kobayashi, J., Shimogoori, A., & Hongo, T. (2016). Jyugyouryoku appu: Akutibu raaningu [Effective active learning: Strategic essentials for discovering and developing your teaching skills] ( M. Ichitsubo, Ed.). Tokyo: Jikkyo Syuppan.
  • Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., Eccles, J. S., & Smith, C. (2013). Youth belonging and cognitive engagement in organized activities: A large-scale field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 34, 208–218.
  • Barkley, E. F. (2009). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. J. (1994). Teaching and the case method. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Beck, J. C., Czerniak, M., & Lumpe, A. T. (2000). An exploratory study of teacher’s beliefs regarding the implementation of constructivism in their classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), 323–343.
  • Biase, R. D. (2019). Moving beyond the teacher-centered/learner-centered dichotomy: Implementing a structured model of active learning in the Maldives. COMPARE: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 49(4), 565–583.
  • Carey, P. (2013). Student engagement: Stakeholder perspectives on course representation in university governance. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1290–1304.
  • Central Council for Education. (2012). Qualitative transformation of undergraduate education. Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/component/b_menu/shingi/toushin/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2012/10/04/1325048_1.pdf
  • Central Council for Education. (2017). Atarashii gakusyushidou youryou no kangaekata [Ways of thinking toward new curricular guidelines]. Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/new-cs/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2017/09/28/1396716_1.pdf
  • Chan, C. W. H., Leung, D. Y. P., Lee, D. T. F., Chair, S. Y., Ip, W. Y., & Sit, J. W. H. (2018). The perception of generic capabilities and learning environment among undergraduate nursing students after the implementation of a senior intake scheme. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(2), 158–165.
  • Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Education Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  • Cook-Sather, A. (2011). Lessons in higher education: Five pedagogical practices that promote active learning for faculty and students. Journal of Faculty Development, 25(3), 33–39.
  • Dadach, Z. E. (2013). First quantitative measurement of motivation. Study of the effects of active learning strategies. Norderstedt: GRIN.
  • Dancer, D., & Kamvounias, P. (2005). Student involvement in assessment: A project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 445–454.
  • Deeley, S. J. (2014). Summative co-assessment: A deep learning approach to enhancing employability skills and attributes. Active Learning in Active Learning, 15(1), 39–51.
  • Diamond, N. S., Koernig, K., & Iqbal, Z. (2008). Uniting active and deep learning to teach problem-solving skills. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(2), 116–129.
  • Drew, V., & Mackie, L. (2011). Extending the constructs of active learning: Implications for teachers’ pedagogy and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 22(4), 451–467.
  • Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99.
  • Esterhazy, R., & Damşa, C. (2017). Unpacking the feedback process: An analysis of undergraduate students’ interactional mean-making of feedback comments. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 260–274.
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410–8415.
  • Gibbs, R., & Poskitt, J. (2010). Student engagement in the middle years of schooling (years 7–10): A literature review. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • Golightly, A., & Raath, S. (2015). Problem-based learning to foster deep learning in preservice geography teacher education. Journal of Geography, 114, 58–68.
  • Graeff, T. R. (2010). Strategic teaching for active learning. Marketing Education Review, 20(3), 265–278.
  • Grosas, A. B., Raju, S. R., Schuett, B. S., Chuck, J.-A., & Miller, T. J. (2016). Determining if active learning through a formative assessment process translates to better performance in summative assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 41(9), 1595–1611.
  • Harrison, R. (2010). Learner managed learning: Managing to learn or learning to manage? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19, 312–321.
  • Hashimoto, M. (2017). Raito actibu raaningu no susume [Encouragements of light active learning]. Tokyo: Nakanishiya Syuppan.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
  • Hurd, P. D. (2000). Active learning. Journal of Pharmacy Teaching, 7(3/4), 29–47.
  • Hussain, R. M. R., Mamat, W. H. W., Salleh, N., Saat, R. M., & Harland, T. (2007). Problem-based learning in Asian universities. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 761–772.
  • Ito, H. (2017). Rethinking active learning in the context of Japanese higher education. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–10.
  • Iwasaki, C. (2015). Daigakusei no manabi wo hagukumu gakusyu kankyou no dezain: Atarashii paradaimu ga hiraku akutibu raaningu [Designs for learning environments that enhance undergraduate learning: Challenges toward active learning led by the new paradigm]. Osaka, Japan: Kansai University Press.
  • Kakuhou, M., Matsumura, N., & Hirata, F. (2011). Syuugyouryoku to daigaku kaikaku [Employability skills and the higher education reform]. Tokyo: Gakuji Syuppan.
  • Kawano, A. (2016). Kyouin yousei katei ni okeru akutibu raaningu no kadai to tenbou [The review of the enactment of active learning for pre-service teacher education]. Bulletin of Joetsu University Education, 35, 43–55.
  • Kember, D. (2009). Promoting student-centered forms of learning across an entire university. Higher Education, 58, 1–13.
  • Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2005). The influence of active learning experiences on the development of graduate capabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 155–170.
  • Kinoshita, T. J., Knight, D. B., & Gibbes, B. (2017). The positive influence of active learning in a lecture hall: An analysis of normalised gain scores in introductory environmental engineering. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 275–284.
  • Kitchens, B., Means, T., & Tan, Y. (2018). Captivate: Building blocks for implementing active learning. Journal of Education for Business, 93(2), 58–73.
  • Kojima, M. (2017). ‘Saiko akutibu raaningu’ o yonde [Reading ‘rethinking of active learning’]. Medical Education, 48(5), 304.
  • Laverie, D. A. (2006). In-class active cooperative learning: A way to build knowledge and skills in marketing courses. Marketing Education Review, 16(2), 59–76.
  • Lee, J.-S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 177–185.
  • Levant, Y., Coulmont, M., & Sandu, R. (2016). Business simulation as an active learning activity for developing soft skills. Accounting Education, 25(4), 368–395.
  • Matsushita, K. (2015). Diipu akutibu raaningu e no izanai [Invitation to deep active learning]. In K. Matsushita (Ed.), Deep active learning: Deepening higher learning (pp. 1–27). Tokyo: Keiso-Shobo.
  • Matushita, K. (2016). Akutibu raaningu o dou hyouka suruka [How to assess active learning]. In K. Matsushita & T. Ishii (Eds.), Akutibu raaningu no hyouka [Assessment of active learning]. Tokyo: Toshindo. pp.3-25.
  • McCullough, K., & Munro, N. (2018). Finance students’ experiences of lecture-based active learning tasks. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 65–73.
  • Michael, J. (2007). Faculty perceptions about barriers to active learning. College Teaching, 55(2), 42–47.
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports & Technology. (2012). Sangyoukai no niizu ni taioushita kyouikukaizen jyuujitutaiseiseibijigyou [Improving higher education for industrial needs]. Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/koutou/kaikaku/sangyou/
  • Misseyanni, A., Lytras, M. D., Papadopoulou, P., & Marouli, C. (2018). Active learning strategies in higher education: Teaching for leadership, innovation, and creativity. Bingley: Emerald.
  • Mizokami, S. (2014). Akutibu raaningu to kyoujyugakusyuu parademu no tankan [Active learning and teaching/learning paradigm shift]. Tokyo: Toshin-do.
  • Mok, I. A. C. (2006). Teacher-dominating lessons in Shanghai: The insiders’ story: Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries. Leiden: Brill Sense.
  • Nagata, T., & Hayashi, K. (2016). Akutibu raaningu no dezain [Practical designs for active learning]. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.
  • Nakai, T. (2015). Akutibu raaningu [Active learning]. Tokyo: Tamagawa University Press.
  • Nakasono, A., & Tanigawa, H. (2018). Akutibu Raaningu saikou [Rethinking active learning]. In Akutibu raaningu hihanteki nyuumon [Practical guides to ‘really’ active learning and its critical re-evaluation]. Tokyo: Nakanishiya Publishing. pp. 11-21.
  • Ní Raghallaigh, M., & Cunniffe, R. (2013). Creating a safe climate for active learning and student engagement: An example from an introductory social work module. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(1), 93–105.
  • Niemi, H. (2002). Active learning – A cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teacher and Teacher Education, 18(7), 763–780.
  • Nishioka, K. (2017). Nihibei ni okeru akutibu raaninguron no seiritsu to tenkai [Establishment and development of active learning in Japan and the USA]. Journal of Education, 84(3), 25–32.
  • O’Grady, A., Simmie, G. M., & Kennedy, T. (2014). Why change to active learning? Pre-service and in-service science teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 35–50.
  • Ogata, N., de Weert, E., & Yoshimoto, K. (2007). Policies on the transition from higher education to employment since the 1990s. In J. Allen, Y. Inenaga, R. van der Velden, & K. Yoshimoto (Eds.), Competencies, higher education and career in Japan and the Netherlands (pp. 25–50). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Oyama, M., & Taguchi, M. (2013). Daigaku ni okeru guruupu gakusyu no ruikeika [Categorization of group learning in higher education]. Journal of Educational Technology in Japan, 37(2), 129–143.
  • Peters, R. A. (2011). Enhancing academic achievement by identifying and minimizing the impediments to active learning. Public Administration Quarterly, 35(4), 466–493.
  • Revell, A., & Wainwight, E. (2009). What makes lectures ‘Unmissable’? Insights into teaching excellence and active learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 209–223.
  • Rico, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2015). Examining the role of the instructor in problem-centered instruction. TechTrends, 59(4), 96–103.
  • Riley, J., & Ward, K. (2017). Active learning, cooperative active learning, and passive learning methods in an accounting information systems course. Issues in Accounting Education, 32(2), 1–16.
  • Rushton, A. (2005). Formative assessment: A key to deep learning? Medical Teacher, 27(6), 509–513.
  • Saladaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
  • Sedaghat, M., Abedin, A., Hejazi, E., & Hassanabadi, H. (2011). Motivation, cognitive engagement, and academic achievement. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2406–2410.
  • Silverman, D. (2017). Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Smiley, W., & Anderson, R. (2011). Measuring students’ cognitive engagement on assessment tests: A confirmatory factor analysis of the short form of the cognitive engagement scale. Research and Practice in Assessment, 6, 17–28.
  • Snyder, K. D. (2003). Ropes, poles, and space: Active learning in business education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(2), 159–167.
  • Stemler, S. (2001). An over view of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 1–10.
  • Tangney, S. (2014). Student-centered learning: A humanist perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), 266–275.
  • Taylor, J. E., & Ku, H.-Y. (2011). Measuring active learning to predict course quality. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(1), 31–48.
  • Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 100–108.
  • Virtanen, A., & Tynjälä, P. (2019). Factors explaining the learning of generic skills: A study of university students’ experiences. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(7), 880–894.
  • Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12.
  • White, C., Bradley, E., Martindale, J., Roy, P., Patel, K., Yoon, M., & Worden, M. K. (2014). Why are medical students ‘checking out’ of active learning in a new curriculum? Medical Teacher, 48, 315–324.
  • Wilson, B. M., Pollock, P. H., & Hamann, K. (2007). Does active learning enhance learner outcomes? Evidence from discussion participation in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 3, 131–142.
  • Wimpenny, K., & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). Alienation, agency and authenticity: A synthesis of the literature of student engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 311–326.
  • Zou, Y., Schunn, C. D., Wang, Y., & Zhang, F. (2017). Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 800–811.