Sociomaterial entanglement in one-to-one computing classrooms: exploring patterns of relations in teaching practices

References

• Beauchamp, G., Burden, K., & Abbinett, E. (2015). Teachers learning to use the iPad in Scotland and Wales: A new model of professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(2), 161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, G., & Hillier, E. (2014). An evaluation of iPad implementation across a network of primary schools in Cardiff. Cardiff: Cardiff Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström, P. (2019). Illustrating an analysing power and control relations in Finnish one-to-one computing clasrooms: Teacher practices in grade 7–9. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 14(3–4), 117–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström, P., & Mårell-Olsson, E. (2018). Power and control in the one-to-one computing classroom: Students’ perspectives on teachers’ didactical design. Seminar.net - International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 14(2), 160–173.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström, P., Mårell-Olsson, E., & Jahnke, I. (2019). Variations of symbolic power and control in the one-to-one computing classroom: Swedish teachers’ enacted didactical design decisions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(1), 38–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M. (2012). Digital literacy in upper secondary school – What do students use their laptops for during teacher instruction. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7(2), 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Blikstadt-Balas, M., & Davies, C. (2017). Assessing the educational value of one-to-one devices: Have we been asking the right questions? Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 311–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstadt-Balas, M., & Klette, K. (2020). Still a long way to go: Narrow and transmissive use of technology in the classroom. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(1), 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocconi, S., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2013). Framing ICT-enabled innovation for learning: The case of one-to-one learning initiatives in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 90-119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden, K., Hopkins, P., Male, T., Martin, T., & Trala, C. (2012). iPad Scotland evaluation. Faculty of Education: University of Hull.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2017). The case of the iPad. In C. Burnett, G. Merchant, A. Simpson, & M. Walsch (Eds.), The Case of the iPad (pp. 1-14). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., Merchant, G., Simpson, A., & Walsch, M. (eds.). (2017). The case of the iPad. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2018). Framing learning entanglement in innovative learning spaces: Connecting theory, design and practice. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1120–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceratto Pargman, T., & Jahnke, I. (2019). Introduction to emergent practices and material conditions in learning and teaching with technologies. In T. Cerratto Pargman & I. Jahnke (Eds.), Emergent practices and material conditions in learning and teaching with technologies (pp. 3–20). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ceratto Pargman, T. (2019). Unpacking emergent teaching practices with digital technology. In T. Cerratto Pargman & I. Jahnke (Eds.), Emergent practices and material conditions in learning and teaching with technologies (pp. 3–20). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Falloon, G. (2013). Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning pathways. Computers & Education, 68(October), 505–521.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2015). Sociomateriality and learning: A critical approach. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage handbook of learning(pp. 83-93) London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischer, H. (2013). En elev-en dator: Kunskapsbildningens kvalitet och villkor i den datoriserade skolan (Doctoral Compilation). Jönköping University. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:663330/FULLTEXT01.pdf(21)
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N.J., & Allred, P. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.921458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, N. (2011). The place of the classroom and the space of the screen – Relational pedagogy and internet technology. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson Lindqvist, M. (2015). Exploring activities regarding technology-enhanced learning in a one-to-one initiative. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(4), 227245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2018). What is ethnography? Can it survive? Should it?, Ethnography and Education, 13:1, 1–17, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2017.1298458
   Google Scholar
• Harper, B., & Milman, N. B. (2016). One-to-one technology in K-12 classrooms: A review of the literature from 2004 through 2014. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assissted Learning, 32(2), 139–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hembre, O. J., & Warth, L. L. (2019). Assembling iPads and mobility in two classroom settings. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(2020), 197–211.
   Google Scholar
• Hershkovitz, A., & Karni, O. (2018). Boarders of change: A holistic exploration of teaching in one-to-one computing programs. Computers & Education, 125(2018), 429–443.
   Google Scholar
• Holm Sørensen, B., Audon, L., & Levinsen, K. T. (2010). Skole 2.0: Didaktiske bidrag. Aarhus: Klim.
   Google Scholar
• Holm Sørensen, B., Levinsen, K. T., & Holm, M. R. (2017). Udvikling af lærerens digitale kompetencer med iPad’en som læringsressource. Learning Tech – Tidsskrift for Læremidler, Didaktik Og Teknologi, 3, 32–55.
   Google Scholar
• Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of Tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 525–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, S. M., & Andersson, A. (2016). Investing choices of appropriate devices for one-to-one computing initiatives in school worldwide. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(10), 817–825.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, S. M., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). An international literature review of 1:1 computing in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 17(2), 191–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnke, I., Norqvist, L., & Olsson, A. (2014). Digital didactical designs of learning expeditions. Lecture notes in Computer Science 8719. In Cristoph Rensing, Sara de Freitas, Tobias Ley, Pedro J. Muños-Merino (Ed.), Open learning and teaching in educational communities. Paper presented at the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning EC-TEL 2014. Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Jahnke, I., Bergström, P., Mårell-Olsson, E., Häll, L., & Kumar, S. (2017). Digital didactical designs as research framework: IPad integration in Nordic schools. Computers & Education, 113, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnke, I., & Kumar, S. (2014). Digital didactical designs: Teachers’ integration of iPads for learning-centered processes. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(3), 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Johri, A. (2011). The socio-materiality of learning practices and implications for the field of learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 207–217.
   Google Scholar
• Kalthoff, H., & Roehl, T. (2011). Intersubjectivity and Interactivity – Material Objects and Discourse in Class. Human Studies, 34(4), 451–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjällander, S. (2011). Designs for learning in an extended digital environment (Doctoral compilation). Stockholm University, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Kongsgården, P., & Krumsvik, R. (2016). Use of tablets in primary and secondary school – A case study. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 11(4), 248–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucirkova, N., & Sakr, M. (2017). Personalized Story-Making on the iPad: Opportunities for Developing the Self and Building Closeness with Others. In Burnett, C., Merchant, G., Simpson A., Walsh, M. (eds) The Case of the iPad. (pp. 179–193) Springer, Singapore. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4364-2_11
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn, M., & Grosvenor, I., (Red.). (2005). Materialities of schooling. Design, technology, objects, routines. Comparative histories of education. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., & Lovvorn, J. F. (2006). Literacy networks: Following the circulation of texts, bodies and objects in the schooling and online gaming of one youth. Cognition and Instruction, 24(3), 291–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system – The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology. 24(1) 95-117.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. (2004). Spatiality and the place of the material in schools. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(3), 347–372.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, G. (2017). Hands, fingers and iPads. In C. Burnett, G. Merchant, A. Simpson, & M. Walsch (Eds.), The case of the iPad (pp.245-256). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. (2015). Learning through telepresence with iPads: Placing schools in local/global communities. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(4), 270–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. (2020). Med teknologien ved hånden: Tablets og mobil læring i skolens praksis (Having technologies at hand: tablets and mobile learning in schooling). Copenhagen: Dafolo.
   Google Scholar
• Mifsud, L. (2014). Mobile learning and the socio-materiality of classroom practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 142–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montrieux, R., Vanderlinde, R., Courtois, C., Schellens, T., & De Marez, L. (2013). A qualitative study about the implementation of tablet computers in secondary education: The teachers’ role in this process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 481–488.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D., & Morrison, C. (2017). Re/assembling ‘innovative’ learning environments: Affective practice and its politics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 749–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school. Politics, space bodies, and signs in the educational process. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pegrum, M., Oakley, G., & Faulkner, R. (2013). Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australia independent schools. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink. (2013). Doing visual ethnography. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saudelli, M. G., & Ciampa, K. (2014). Exploring the role of TPACK and teacher self-efficancy: An ethnographic case study of three iPad language arts classes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.979865
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2011). In praise of pessimism - the need for negativity in educational technology. Editorial. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 713–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and learning in educational practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spires, H. A., Oliver, K., & Corn, J. (2011). The new learning ecology of one-to-one computing environments: Preparing teachers for shifting dynamics and relationships. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tallvid, M. (2015). 1:1 i klassrummet - analyser av en pedagogisk praktik i förändring (Doctoral Compilation). University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg
   Google Scholar
• Thumlert, K., De Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2015). Short cuts and extended techniques: Rethinking relations between technology and educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(8), 786–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., De Bruyne, M., Van Den Driessche, S., McKenny, S., & Zandvliet, D. (2015). The physical placement of classroom technology and its influences on educational practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(4), 537–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toohey, K. (2019). The onto-epistemologies of new materialism: Implications for applied linguistics pedagogies and research. Applied Linguistics, 40(6), 937–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund-Engblom, A. (2018). Digital relational competence: Sensitivity and responsivity to needs of distance and co-located students. Seminar.net - International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 14(2), 188–200.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C-H., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in One-to-One Laptop Environments: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084, doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628645.
   Google Scholar