1,777
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

School leaders’ actions and hybridity when carrying out reform and confronting teachers’ responses: institutional and organisational perspectives

ORCID Icon

References

  • Act on the Education and Recruitment of Teachers and Administrators of Preschools, Compulsory Schools and Upper Secondary Schools No. 87/2008. Reykjavík: Althingi. Retrived from https://www.althingi.is/lagas/nuna/2008087.html
  • Adolfsson, C.-H., & Alvunger, D. (2020). Power dynamics and policy actions in the changing landscape of local school governance. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(2), 128–142.
  • Althingi [The Parliament]. (2006–2007). Svar menntamálaráðherra viðfyrirspurn Björgvins G. Sigurðssonar um brottfall úr framhaldsskólum [The education minister’s answer to a parliament member’s inquiry about dropout from upper secondary schools]. Retrieved from http://www.althingi.is/altext/130/s/pdf/1406.pdf
  • Ansell, C., Boin, A., & Farjoun, M. (2015). Dynamic conservatism: How institutions change to remain the same. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick’s legacy for organizational studies (pp. 89–119). Bingley: Emerald.
  • Arnesen, A.-L., Lahelma, E., Lundahl, L., & Öhrn, E. (2014). Unfolding the context and the contents: Critical perspectives on contemporary Nordic schooling. In A.-L. Arnesen, E. Lahelma, L. Lundahl, & E. Öhrn (Eds.), Fair and competitive? Critical perspectives on contemporary Nordic schooling (pp. 1–19). London: The Tufnell.
  • Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. London: Methuen.
  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
  • Barsh, J., Capozzi, M. M., & Davidson, J. (2008). Leadership and innovation. MacKinsey Quality, 2008(1), 37–47. Retrieved from http://fcollege.nankai.edu.cn/_upload/article/16/b8/df9c1562464086198aace3a57543/ffa06968-12af-4a4f-a312-71da0774e8bd.pdf
  • Besharov, M., & Khurana, R. (2015). Leading amidst competing technical and institutional demands: Revisiting Selznick’s conception of leadership. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick’s legacy for organizational studies (pp. 53–88). Bingley: Emerald.
  • Bjarnadóttir, V. S., & Geirsdóttir, G. (2018). You know, nothing changes’. Student influence in upper secondary schools in Iceland. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 26(4), 631–641.
  • Bleazby, J. (2015). Why some school subjects have a higher status than others: The epistemology of the traditional curriculum hierarchy. Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 671–689.
  • Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research. A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
  • Burch, P. (2007). Educational policy and practice from the perspective of institutional theory: Crafting a wider lens. Educational Researcher, 36(2), 84–95.
  • Chen, S., & Ke, Z. (2014). Why the leadership of change is especially difficult for Chinese principals: A macro-institutional explanation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(3), 486–498.
  • Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244.
  • Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.
  • Deng, Z. (2013). School subjects and academic disciplines. The differences. In Í. A. Luke, A. Woods, & K. Weir (Eds.), Curriculum syllabus design and equity. A primer and model (pp. 40–53). New York: Routledge.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dickson, M. W., Castaño, N., Magomaeva, A., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2012). Conceptualizing leadership across cultures. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 483–492.
  • Eiríksdóttir, E., Ragnarsdóttir, G., & Jónasson, J. T. (2018). Þversagnir og kerfisvillur? Kortlagning á ólíkri stöðu bóknáms- og starfsnámsbrauta á framhaldsskólastigi [On parity of esteem between vocational and general academic programs in upper secondary education in Iceland]. Netla – Veftímarit um uppeldi og menntun: Sérrit 2018 – Framhaldsskólinn í brennidepli [Netla – Online Journal on Pedagogy and Education]. University of Iceland, School of Education. Retrieved from http://netla.hi.is/serrit/2018/framhaldskolinn_brennidepli/07.pdf
  • Finnbogason, G. E. (2013). Lyklar framtíðar. Lykilhæfni í menntastefnu Evrópu og Íslands [Keys to the future. – Ideas on key educational competences in Europe and Iceland] [ Netla]. Online Journal on Pedagogy and Education [ Special issue 2016]. Retrieved from http://netla.hi.is/serrit/2016/menntun_mannvit_og_margbreytileiki_greinar_fra_menntakviku/002.pdf
  • Gunnulfsen, A. E., & Møller, J. (2017). National testing. Gains or strains? School leaders’ responses to policy demands. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(3), 455–474.
  • Hansen, D. R., Bøje, J., & Beck, S. (2014). What are they talking about? The construction of good teaching among students, teachers and management in the reformed Danish upper secondary school. Education Inquiry, 5(4), 583–601.
  • Harðarson, A. (2010). Skilningur framhaldsskólakennara á almennum námsmarkmiðum [How teachers in secondary schools understand the general aims of education]. Journal of Educational Research (Iceland), 7, 93–107.
  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. London: Routledge.
  • Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41.
  • Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ingvarsdóttir, H. (2006). “… eins og þver geit í girðingu“. Viðhorf kennara til breytinga á kennsluháttum“. Viðhorf kennara til breytinga á kennsluháttum [“… like a stubborn goat in a fence.” Teachers perceptions on changed teaching methods]. In Ú. Hauksson (Ed.), Rannsóknir í félagsvísindum VII, Félagsvísindadeild (pp. 351–363). Reykjavík: Félagsvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.
  • Jónasson, J. T. (2016). Educational change, inertia and potential futures. Why is it difficult to change the content of education? European Journal of Futures Research, 4(7), 1–14.
  • Jónasson, J. T., & Óskarsdóttir, G. (2016). Iceland: Educational structure and development. In T. Sprague (Ed.), Education in non-EU countries in Western and Southern Europe (pp. 11–36). London: Bloomsbbury.
  • Kraatz, M. S. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 59–91). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kraatz, M. S., & Moore, J. H. (2002). Executive migration and institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 120–143.
  • Levin, B. (2013). Improving secondary schools. In A. Luke, A. Woods, & K. Weir (Eds.), Curriculum syllabus design and equity. A primer and model (pp. 129–143). New York: Routledge.
  • Li, Y. (2011). Translating interviews, translating lives: Ethical considerations in cross-language narrative inquiry. TESL Canada Journal, 28(5), 16–30.
  • Liljenberg, M. (2015). School leaders as coupling agents: Mediating between external demands and internal values. Education Inquiry, 6(4), 457–479.
  • Luke, A., Woods, A., & Weir, K. (2013). Curriculum design, equity and the technical form of the curriculum. In A. Luke, A. Woods, & K. Weir (Eds.), Curriculum syllabus design and equity. A primer and model (pp. 6–39). New York: Routledge.
  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional community and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. (1999). The Icelandic national curriculum guide. General section 1999. Reykjavík: Author.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. (2012). The Icelandic national curriculum guide for upper secondary schools. General section. Reykjavík: Author.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. (2014). White paper on education reform. Author. https://www.stjornarradid.is/media/menntamalaraduneyti-media/media/frettir2015/Hvitbok_ENSKA_04.pdf
  • Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563–588.
  • Raffaelli, R. (2013). Identity and institutional change in a mature field: The re-emergence of the Swiss watchmaking industry, 1970–2008. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
  • Raffaelli, R., & Glynn, M. A. (2015). What’s so institutional about leadership? Leadership mechanisms of value infusion. In M. Lounsbury (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick’s legacy for organizational studies (Vol. 44, pp. 283–316). Bingley: Emerald.
  • Ragnarsdóttir, G. (2018a). School Leaders’ Perceptions of Contemporary Change at the Upper Secondary School Level in Iceland. Interaction of actors and social structures facilitating or constraining change (PhD), University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
  • Ragnarsdóttir, G. (2018b) Kvika menntabreytinga: Viðbrögð framhaldsskólans við kröfum menntayfirvalda um breytingar [Dynamics of change: The upper secondary schools’ responses to ministerial demands for change]. Netla – Veftímarit um uppeldi og menntun: Sérrit 2018 – Framhaldsskólinn í brennidepli [Netla – Online Journal on Pedagogy and Education]. University of Iceland, School of Education. Retrieved from http://netla.hi.is/serrit/2018/framhaldskolinn_brennidepli/05.pdf
  • Ragnarsdóttir, G., & Jóhannesson, I. Á. (2014). Curriculum, crisis and the work and well-being of Icelandic upper secondary school teachers. Education Inquiry, 5(1), 43–67.
  • Ragnarsdóttir, G., & Jónasson, J. T. (2020). The impact of the university on upper secondary education through academic subjects according to school leaders’ perceptions. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors, & M. Paulsen (Eds.), Re-centering the critical potential of Nordic school leadership research (pp. 191–207). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55027-1_11
  • Research Ethics Committee. (2014). Vísindasiðareglur Háskóla Íslands [University of Iceland research ethical codes]. Retrieved from https://www.hi.is/sites/default/files/atli/pdf/log_og_reglur/vshi_sidareglur_16_1_2014.pdf
  • Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests and identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective. A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430–471.
  • Upper Secondary Education Act No. 80/1996. Reykjavík: Althingi. Retrieved from https://www.althingi.is/lagas/135a/1996080.html
  • Upper Secondary Education Act No. 92/2008. Reykjavík: Althingi. Retrieved from https://www.government.is/media/menntamalaraduneyti-media/media/frettatengt2016/Thyding-log-um-framhaldsskola-juli-2016.pdf
  • Waks, L. J. (2007). The concept of fundamental educational change. Educational Theory, 57(3), 277–295.
  • Washington, M., Boal, K. B., & Davis, J. N. (2008). Institutional leadership: Past, present, and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization institutionalism (pp. 719–733). London: Sage.