1,603
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

“Internet? That’s an app you can download”. First-graders use linguistic resources to describe internet and digital information

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Andersson, J. (2019). Svenskarna och internet 2019: Undersökning om svenskarnas internetvanor. Internetstiftelsen. Hämtad från https://svenskarnaochinternet.se/rapporter/barnen-och-internet-2019/sammanfattning/
  • Bernstein, B. (1972). Applied studies towards a sociology of language (Vol. 2). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (rev ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Bordoff, S., & Yan, Z. (2017). Understanding the technical and social complexity of the Internet: A cognitive developmental resource perspective. In F. Blumberg & P. Brooks (Eds.), Cognitive development in digital contexts (pp. 237–251). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  • Bråten, I., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2019). Teaching sourcing in upper secondary school: A comprehensive sourcing intervention with follow‐up data. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(4), 481–505.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2), 77–101.
  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. New York: Sage Publications.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Buchanan, R., & Murray, T. (2018). ’The internet is all around us’: How children come to understand the internet. Digital Culture & Education, 10(1), 1–21.
  • Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy-What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(Jubileumsnummer), 21–35.
  • Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. London: Continuum.
  • Cuban, L. (1993). Computers meet classroom: Classroom wins. Teachers College Record, 95(2), 185.
  • Danovitch, J. H. (2019). Growing up with Google: How children’s understanding and use of internet‐based devices relates to cognitive development. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 81–90.
  • Edwards, S., Nolan, A., Henderson, M., Mantilla, A., Plowman, L., & Skouteris, H. (2018). Young children’s everyday concepts of the internet: A platform for cyber‐safety education in the early years. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 45–55.
  • Eskelä-Haapanen, S., & Kiili, C. (2019). ‘It Goes Around the World’–Children’s Understanding of the Internet. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 14(3–4), 175–187.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1980/2004). Three aspects of children's language development. In J. Webster (Ed.), Language of early childhood (Vol. 4, pp. 308–326). London; New York: Continuum.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1989/1993). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 69–85). New York: Routledge Falmer.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1993/2004). Towards a language-based theory of learning. In J. Webster (Ed.), The language of early childhood: Volume 4 (pp. 327–352). London: Continuum.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Mathiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4 ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. New York: Routledge.
  • Janks, H. (2013). Critical literacy in teaching and research. Educational Inquiry, 4(2), 225–242.
  • Kortesluoma, R. L., Hentinen, M., & Nikkonen, M. (2003). Conducting a qualitative child interview: Methodological considerations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(5), 434–441.
  • Leiner, B. M., Cerf, V. G., Clark, D. D., Kahn, R. E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D. C., … Wolff, S. (2009). A brief history of the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(5), 22–31.
  • Lovato, S. B., & Piper, A. M. (2019). Young children and voice search: What we know from human-computer interaction research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–5.
  • Luckin, R., Rimmer, J., & Lloyd, A. (2001). Turning on the Internet”: Exploring children’s conceptions of what the Internet is and does. In European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the first European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning Maastricht Universiteit Maastricht.
  • Macnaught, L., Maton, K., Martin, J. R., & Matruglio, E. (2013). Jointly constructing semantic waves: Implications for teacher training. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 50–63.
  • Martin, J. R. (2013). Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 23–37.
  • Martin, J. R., & Maton, K. (2017). Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory on education: Rethinking field and knowledge structure. Onomázein: Número Especial LSF y TCL sobre educación y conocimiento, SFL, 12–45.
  • Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
  • Maton, K. (2007). Segmentalism: The problem of building knowledge and creating knowers. In D. Frandji & P. Vitale (Eds.), Knowledge, pedagogy and society (pp. 126–139). London: Routledge.
  • Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.
  • Mertala, P. (2019). Young children’s conceptions of computers, code, and the Internet. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 19, 56–66.
  • Mertala, P. (2020). Young children’s perceptions of ubiquitous computing and the Internet of Things. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 84–102.
  • Nygård Larsson, P. (2018). “We’re talking about mobility:” Discourse strategies for promoting disciplinary knowledge and language in educational contexts. Linguistics and Education, 48, 61–75.
  • Oliemat, E., Ihmeideh, F., & Alkhawaldeh, M. (2018). The use of touch-screen tablets in early childhood: Children’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards tablet technology. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 591–597.
  • Painter, C. (1984). Into the mother tongue. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Pantić, N., & Florian, L. (2015). Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice. Education Inquiry, 6(3), 333–351.
  • Selwyn, N., & Pangrazio, L. (2018). Doing data differently? Developing personal data tactics and strategies amongst young mobile media users. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 1–12.
  • Shapiro, J. P. (1991). Interviewing children about psychological issues associated with sexual abuse. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 28(1), 55–66.
  • Sinatra, G. M., & Lombardi, D. (2020). Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims inthe post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 120–131.
  • Smahel, D., MacHackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Olafsson, K., … Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. EU Kids Online. h ttp://1 0.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo
  • Thomas, K. M., O’Bannon, B. W., & Bolton, N. (2013). Cell phones in the classroom: Teachers’ perspectives of inclusion, benefits, and barriers. Computers in the Schools, 30(4), 295–308.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Walldén, R. (2019). Genom genrens lins: Pedagogisk kommunikation i tidigare skolår. Malmö: Malmö universitet. doi:10.24834/2043/26799
  • Walldén, R. (2020). Communicating metaknowledge to L2 learners: A fragile scaffold for participation in subject-related discourse? L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 20(Running Issue), 1–23.
  • Walldén, R., & Nygård Larsson, P. (2021). Negotiating figurative language from literary texts: Second-language instruction as a dual literacy practice. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 21, Running Issue, 1–30.
  • Wells, G. (1994). Learning and teaching “scientific concepts”: Vygotsky's ideas revisited. Paper presented at the Vygotskij and the Human Sciences Conference, Moscow.
  • Yan, Z. (2005). Age differences in children’s understanding of complexity of the Internet. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(4), 385–396.
  • Yan, Z. (2006). What influences children’s and adolescents’ understanding of the complexity of the Internet? Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 418–428. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.418
  • Yan, Z. (2009). Limited knowledge and limited resources: Children’s and adolescents’ understanding of the Internet. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 103–115.