Openness – flexibility – transition. Nordic prospects for changes in the school learning environment

References

• Aebli, H. (2006). Zwölf grundformen des lehrens. Eine allgemeine didaktik auf psychologischer grundlage. medien und inhalte didaktischer kommunikation, der lernzyklus. [Twelve basic forms of teaching. A general didactic on a psychological basis. Media and contents of didactic communication, the learning cycle] (pp. 13). Aufl. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Davies, F., & Barrett, L. (2015), Clever Classroom. Summary Report of the HEAD Project (Holistic Evidence and Design), Salford.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N., Andreae, J., Hegarty, P., & Wade, B. (1980). Open plan schools. Windsor: Schools Council Publishing/NFER.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, C. (2014). Looking back to imagine the future: Connecting with the radical past in technologies of school design. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(1), 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., Saltmarsh, S., Chapman, A., & Drew, C. (2013). Issues of teacher professional learning within ‘non-traditional’ classroom environments. Improving Schools, 16(3), 209–222.
   Google Scholar
• Certeau, M. D. (1988). Praktiken im raum [Practices in space]. Aus dem Französischen von Ronald Voullie. In M. D Certeau (Ed.),kunst des handelns [Art of dealing] (p. 179–238). Berlin:Merve-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, I. (1982). Design and use of British primary schools: An examination of government-endorsed advice. Design Studies, 3(1), 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gislason, N. (2011). Building innovation. History, cases, and perspectives on school design. Big Tancook Island, Canada: Backalong Books.
   Google Scholar
• Imms, W. (2018). Innovative learning spaces: Catalysts/agents for change, or ‘just another fad’? In S. Alterator & C. Deed (Eds.), School space and its occupation conceptualising and evaluating innovative learning environments (pp. 107–120). Amsterdam: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Ball, S. (2015). ‘Where you stand depends on where you sit’: The social construction of policy enactments in the (English) secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 485–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (2011) The New Zealand school property strategy 20112021 http://gdsindexnz.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/The-New-Zealand-School-Property-Strategy-2011-2021.pdf [24/October/2019]
   Google Scholar
• Noack, M. (1996). Der Schulraum als Pädagogikum. Zur relevanz des lernorts für das lernen. [The classroom as a pedagogy. The relevance of the learning location for learning]. Weinheim: Studienverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2013). Innovative learning environments. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/innovativelearningenvironmentspublication.htm 24/October/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2014). DeSeCo: Definition and Selection of Competencies – concept. http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/definitionandselectionofcompetenciesdeseco.htm. [21/October/2019].
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2017). The OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. (2011). Schools, teachers, and curriculum change: A balancing act? Journal of Educational Change, 12(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Proshansky, E., & Wolfe, M. (1974). The physical setting and open education. The School Review, 82(4), 556–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanoff, H. (2001). School building assessment methods. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurðardóttir, A. K., & Hjartson, T. (2011). School buildings for the 21st century. Some features of new school buildings in Iceland. CEPS Journal, 1(2), 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Smardon, D., Charteris, J., & Nelson, E. (2015). Shifts to learning eco-systems: Principals’ and teachers’ perceptions of innovative learning environments. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 12(2), 149–171.
   Google Scholar
• Stadler-Altmann, U. (ed.). (2016). Lernumgebungen. Erziehungswissenschaftliche und architekturkritische perspektiven auf schulgebäude und klassenzimmer. [Learning environment. Educational and architectural views on school buildings and classrooms]. Opladen/Berlin/Toronto: Barbara Budrich [bilingual publication].
   Google Scholar
• Stadler-Altmann, U. (2018). Designing Educational and Learning Space: Transforming Processes of Schools and Classrooms – Menntakvika. Reykjavik: University of Iceland. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.28137.95849
   Google Scholar
• Stadler-Altmann, U., & Lang, A. (2019). Heterotopie des Lehrens und Lernens. (Schul-) Räume und Körperlichkeit [Heterotopia of teaching and learning. (School) spaces and bodilyity]. In U. Stadler-Altmann & B. Gross (Eds.), Beyond erziehungswissenschaftlicher Grenzen. Diskurs zu entgrenzungen der disziplin [Beyond educational boundaries. Discourse on the transgressions of the discipline] (pp. 117–137). Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Barbara Budrich, S.
   Google Scholar
• Tse, H. (2019). Designing buildings for the future of schooling: Contemporary visions for education. Abingdon New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walden, R. (2009). Schools for the future. Design proposal from architectural psychology. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. (2017) A School’s Lived Architecture: The politics and ethics of flexible learning spaces. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Education and Social Research Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, K. (2016). Re-placing Flexibility. In K. Fisher (Ed.), The Translational Design of Schools (pp. 51–79).Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner, P. (2010). The design of learning space. London, New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner, P., Clark, J., Laing, K., Thomas, U., & Tiplady, L. (2014). A school tries to change: How leaders and teachers understand changes to space and practices in a UK secondary school. Improving Schools, 17(2), 148–162.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner, P., McCarter, S., Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2012). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice? Improving Schools, 15(1), 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner, P., Thomas, U., & Tiplady, L. (2018). Structural change from physical foundations: The role of the environment in enacting school change. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanin, R., Rauch, F., Schuster, A., Lechner, C., Stadler-Altmann, U., & Drumbl, J. ( Hrsg.). (2021). Aktionsforschung, Lesson- und Learning-Studies in Kindergarten, Schule und Universität: Herausforderung Mehrsprachigkeit. Wien: Praesens Verlag.
   Google Scholar