3,909
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Discussion Paper

Digital competence across boundaries - beyond a common Nordic model of the digitalisation of K-12 schools?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all

References

  • Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014). The Nordic education model. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Bundsgaard, J., Bindslev, S., Caeli, E. N., Pettersson, M., & Rusmann, A. (2019). Danske elevers teknologiforståelse. Resultater fra ICILS-undersøgelsen 2018. [Danish students’ technological understanding. Results from the ICILS study 2018]. Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
  • European Commission. (2020). Digital education action plan (20212027) Resetting education and training for the digital age. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/education/education-in-the-eu/digital-education-action-plan_en
  • European Union. 2006. Recommendation of the European parliament and of the council 2006/962/EG. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF
  • Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC83167/lb-na-26035-enn.pdf
  • Finnish National Agency for Education. (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014. [The national core curriculum for basic education, 2014]. Helsinki. Available at: http://www.oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf
  • Finnish National Agency for Education (2019). Lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2019. [The national core curriculum for upper secondary education, 2019] Helsinki. Available at: https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/lukion_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2019.pdf
  • Fox, N. J. (2011). Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies. Sociology, 45(1), 70–85.
  • Fransson, G., Lindberg, J. O., & Olofsson, A. D. (2018). Adequate digital competence – A close reading of the new national strategy for digitalization of the schools in Sweden. International Journal of Media, Technology & Lifelong Learning, 14(2), 217–228.
  • Hatlevik, O. E., Egeberg, G., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., Loftsgarden, M., & Loi, M. (2013). Monitor skole 2013. [The digital state of affairs in Norwegian schools 2013]. Norway: Center for ICT in Education.
  • Imsen, G., Blossing, U., & Moos, L. (2017). Reshaping the Nordic education model in an era of efficiency. Changes in the comprehensive school project in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden since the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 568–583.
  • Islind, A. S., Lindroth, T., Lundin, J., & Steineck, G. (2019). Co-designing a digital platform with boundary objects: Bringing together heterogeneous users in healthcare. Health and Technology, 9(4), 425–438.
  • Jakobi, A. P. (2009). Global education policy in the making: International organisations and lifelong learning. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 7(4), 473–487.
  • Jedeskog, G. (2005). Ch@nging school – Implementation of ICT in Swedish school, campaigns and experiences 19842004. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitetstryckeri.
  • Karlsohn, T. (2009). Teknik–retorik–kritik: Om IT-bubblan och datoriseringen av den svenska skolan. [Technology-rhetoric-critique: About the IT-bubble and the computorization of the Swedish school]. Stockholm: Carlsson Bokförlag.
  • Kelentric, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A. (2017). Professional digital competence framework for teachers. Norway: Center for ICT in Education.
  • Kertcher, Z., & Coslor, E. (2020). Boundary objects and the technical culture divide: Successful practices for voluntary innovation teams crossing scientific and professional fields. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(1), 76–91.
  • Meld. St. no 37. (1988). Om datateknologi i skole og opplæring (1987–88). [About data technology in school and education (1987–88)]. White paper no. 37. Norway.
  • Ministry of Church Affairs, Education and Research, Norway. (2000). IKT i norsk utdanning. Plan for 2000 – 2003. [ICT in Norwegian Education. Action plan for 20002003].
  • Ministry of Education and Research, Norway. (2004). Program for digital kompetanse 2004–2008. [Program for digital competence 2004–2008]. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kd/vedlegg/grunnskole/strategiplaner/program_for_digital_kompetanse_liten.pdf
  • Ministry of Education, Denmark. (2016). Lov om de gymnasiale uddannelser. [Law on the upper secondary educations]. Available at: https://www.retsinformation.dk/forms/r0710.aspx?id=186027
  • Ministry of Industry, Business and Financial Affairs, Denmark. (2018). The Danish government launches the technology pact. Available at: https://eng.em.dk/news/2018/april/the-danish-government-launches-the-technology-pact/
  • Moonen, J. (2008). Policy from a global perspective. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1171–1178). Boston, MA: Springer Science.
  • Moos, L. (2013). Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership. London: Springer.
  • OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Author. Available at doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264006416-en
  • National reports during the (1990s) (Statistics Norway, 1995 & 1997) showed a need to strengthen the use of digital technology in Norwegian schools.
  • OECD (2005). The OECD program definition and selection of competencies (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive summary. June, 2005. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf
  • OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Paris: Author. Available at https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en.
  • OECD. 2019. Improving school quality in Norway: The new competence development model, implementing education policies. Paris: Author. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/179d4ded-en
  • Olofsson, A. D., Fransson, G., & Lindberg, J. O. (2020). A study of the use of digital technology and its conditions with a view to understanding what ‘adequate digital competence’ may mean in a national policy initiative. Educational Studies, 46(6), 727–743.
  • Olofsson, A. D., Lindberg, J. O., & Fransson, G. (2017). What do upper secondary school teachers want to know from research on the use of ICT and how does this inform a research design? Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2897–2914.
  • Ottestad, G. (2010). Innovative pedagogical practice with ICT in three Nordic countries–differences and similarities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 478–491.
  • Pedersen, S. G., Malmberg, P., Christensen, A. J., Pedersen, M., Nipper, S., Græm, C. D., & Norrgård, J. (2006). E-learning Nordic 2006. Impact of ICT on education. Ramboll Management.
  • Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., Law, N., & Quale, A. (Eds). (2009). Cross national information and communication technology policies and practices in education (Revised Second ed.). IAP, Charlotte, North Carolina.
  • Saarikoski, P. (2006). Koneen ja koulun ensikohtaaminen: Suomalaisen atk-koulutuksen varhaisvaiheet peruskoulussa ja lukiossa. [The first encounter of a computer and school: The first years of computing in basic education and in upper secondary school]. Tekniikan Waiheita, 24(3), 5–19. Available at: https://journal.fi/tekniikanwaiheita/article/view/63817
  • Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016). Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 19, 58–84.
  • Sintef (2019). Monitor 2019. En deskriptiv kartlegging av digital tilstand i norske skoler og barnehager [Monitor 2019. A descriptive mapping of the digital status in Norwegian schools and preschools].
  • Smith, R. C., Bossen, C., Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2020). When participatory design becomes policy: Technology comprehension in Danish education. In PDC’ 20: Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference (pp. 148158), Manizales, Colombia. Full papers. Vol 1. June 2020. Pages 148–158.
  • Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.
  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
  • Statistics Norway. (1995). Bruk av EDB i skolen 1995. [Use of IT in schools 1995].
  • Statistics Norway. (1997). IT i skolen 1997. [IT in schools 1997].
  • Supplement to Government decision I:1, Sweden. (2017). Available at: https://www.regeringen.se/4a9d9a/contentassets/00b3d9118b0144f6bb95302f3e08d11c/nationell-digitaliseringsstrategi-for-skolvasendet.pdf
  • Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) (2019). #skolDigiplan. Nationell handlingsplan för digitalisering av skolväsendet [#skolDigiplan National plan of action for the digitalisation of the school]. Available at: https://issuu.com/sverigeskommunerochlandsting/docs/7585-773-2.2019
  • Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2004). From collectivism to individualism? Education as nation building in a Scandinavian perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 141–158.
  • Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.
  • Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van De Gaer, E., & Monseur, C. (2013). The use of ICT in education: A survey of schools in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 11–27.