1,763
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Practice-near school research in Sweden: tendencies and teachers’ roles

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aasen, P., & Prøitz, T. (2004). Initiering, finansiering och förvaltning av praxisnära forskning: Sektormyndighetens roll i svensk utbildningsforskning [Initiation, funding and management of practice-related research: The role of the responsible authority in Swedish educational research]. NIFU Skriftserie 10/2004.
  • Adolfsson, C. H., & Sundberg, D. (2018). Att forskningsbasera den svenska skolan: Policyinitiativ under 25 år [Making the Swedish school research-based: Policy initiatives during 25 years]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 23(1–2), 39–63.
  • Askling, B. (2006). Utbildningsvetenskap: Ett vetenskapsområde tar form [Educational science: Building a field of science]. Vetenskapsrådet.
  • Bailan, A., & Green, J. (2019). Effekten av fysisk aktivitet i matematikundervisningen [Effects of physical activity in mathematics education]. ForskUL, 7(3), 6–27.
  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
  • Ball, S. J. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: Reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 306–313.
  • Bellander, E., Blaesild, M., & Björklund Boistrup, L. (2017). Matematik i yrkesprogram – En modell för två ämnens relationer med varandra [Mathematics in vocational training – A model for relations between two subjects]. ForskUL, 5(2), 52–77.
  • Bengtsson, D., Weiland, M., & Anderhag, P. (2017). Innehåller silver kol? – En studie om elevers begreppsanvändning när de arbetar med kolets kretslopp [Does silver contain carbon? – A study of students’ use of concepts when working with the carbon cycle]. ForskUL, 5(1), 6–25.
  • Bergdahl, N., Knutsson, O., & Fors, U. (2018). Designing for engagement in TEL – A teacher-researcher collaboration. Designs For Learning, 10(1), 100–111.
  • Bergmark, U., & Hansson, K. (2020). How teachers and principals enact the policy of building education in Sweden on a scientific foundation and proven experience: Challenges and opportunities. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(3), 448–467.
  • Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2014). Collaboration between academics and teachers: A complex relationship. Educational Action Research, 22(2), 270–284.
  • Björk, M., Nikula, Å., Stensland, P., & Stridfält, A. (2019). Tecken på teoretiskt tänkande om strukturer i bassystemet [Signs of theoretical thinking about structures in the basic system]. ForskUL, 7(2), 26–49.
  • Björkholm, E. (2018). Sammanfogning av material i eget konstruktionsarbete – Kunnande och elevuppgifter i tidig teknikundervisning [Combining materials in own design work - knowledge and student assignments in early technical education]. ForskUL, 6(1), 5–22.
  • Brante, G., & Brunosson, A. (2014). To double a recipe – Interdisciplinary teaching and learning of mathematical content knowledge in a home economics setting. Education Inquiry, 5(2), 301–318.
  • Broman, A., Frohagen, J., & Wemmenhag, J. (2013). Vad kan man när man kan tillverka ett uttryck i slöjdföremål? [What can you do when you can make an expression in handicraft objects?]. ForskUL, 10, 6–28.
  • Carpenter, G. W. (2017). Sampling, Methodological Issues. In Ed. (M. Allen), The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods, 1531–1534 . doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n536
  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education knowledge and action research. Falmer Press.
  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2005). Staying critical. Educational Action Research, 13(3), 347–358.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (Eds.). (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. Teachers College Press.
  • Curry, M. W. (2012). In pursuit of reciprocity: Researchers, teachers, and school reformers engaged in collaborative analysis of video records. Theory Into Practice, 51(2), 91–98.
  • Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, H., … Sutton, A. J. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodology, 6(35). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
  • Educare (2020). https://ojs.mau.se/index.php/educare/about [20200420]
  • Education Act [Skollag](SFS 2010:800). https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800
  • Elliot, J. (1990). Teachers as researchers: Implications for supervision and for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(1), 1–26.
  • Elliott, J. (2005). Becoming critical: The failure to connect. Educational Action Research, 13(3), 359–374.
  • Eriksson, H., & Eriksson, I. (2014). Matematik som teoretiskt arbete – Utveckling av matematiska modeller för rationella tal i åk 4 [mathematics as theoretical work – developing mathematical models for rational numbers in year 4]. ForskUL, 4(1), 6–24.
  • Eriksson, I. (2018). Lärares medverkan i praktiknära forskning: Förutsättningar och hinder [Teachers’ participation in practice-near research: Conditions and obstacles]. Utbildning & Lärande, 12(1), 27–40.
  • Erixson, L., Frostfeldt Gustavsson, K., Kerekes, B., & Lundberg, L. (2013). Att se det som inte syns – Om talföljder i årskurs 3 och 4 [To see what is not visible - about speech sequences in grades 3 and 4]. ForskUL, 10, 64–81.
  • Flodin, L., Almgren, A., Feldt, K.-O., Lundius, A., Sirén, E.-L., & Sörman, H. (2011). Fler lärare måste bli forskare [More teachers need to be researchers]. In Svenska Dagbladet, 2011-April-13. Available: https://www.svd.se/fler-larare-maste-bli-forskare [20200613].
  • ForskUL, Forskning om undervisning och lärande [Research on teaching and learning] (2020). https://ForskUL.se/om-skriften/ [20200420]
  • Fridolfsson, A.-K., Clarke Bolin, Å., Jonsson, A., & Reimark, J. (2019). Gymnasieelevers användning av normkritik och naturvetenskap för att granska frågor om sexualitet och kön [Upper secondary school students’ use of norm criticism and science to examine issues of sexuality and gender]. ForskUL, 7(3), 28–47.
  • Gade, S. (2012). Teacher–researcher collaboration in a Grade Four mathematics classroom: Restoring equality to students’ usage of the ‘=’ sign. Educational Action Research, 20(4), 553–570.
  • Government Directive (U 2017:03) 2017. Praktiknära skolforskning i samverkan [Practice-near school research in collaboration]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
  • Gustafsson, P., Jonsson, G., & Nilsson, T. (2018). Teknikämnet i svensk grundskolas tidiga skolår sett genom forskningscirkelns lupp. [The technology subject in Swedish early elementary school seen through the research circle]. NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, 14(2), 113–124.
  • Gustavsen, B. (2001). Theory and practice: The mediating discourse. In P. Reason, and H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry & practice. Sage Publications Ltd, 17–27 .
  • Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press.
  • Holmqvist, O. M., & Olander, C. (2017). Analysing teachers’ operations when teaching students: What constitutes scientific theories? International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 840–862.
  • International Journal of Sciences Education. (2021) https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=tsed20. [20210923].
  • Jaara Åstrand, J. (2017). Lärares utbildning kan inte sluta vid examen [Teachers’ education should not stop at graduation]. Lärarförbundets ordförandeblogg 2017-August-02. Available: https://www.lararforbundet.se/bloggar/ordforandebloggen-johanna-jaara-aastrand/larares-utbildning-kan-inte-sluta-vid-examen. [20200613].
  • Johansson, P. (2019). Historical enquiry in primary school: Teaching interpretation of archaeological artefacts from an intercultural perspective. History Education Research Journal, 16(2), 248–273.
  • Karlsson, E., & Wennergren, A.-C. (2014). Att använda elevsvar i undervisningen [Using student responses in teaching]. ForskUL, 13, 53–66.
  • Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research as a practice‐based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463–474.
  • Kullberg, A., Mårtensson, P., & Runesson, U. (2016). What is to be learned? Teachers’ collective inquiry into the object of learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research: From Phenomenography to Variation Theory - Current Trends, 60(3), 309–322.
  • Levinsson, M. (2013). Evidens och existens. Evidensbaserad undervisning i ljuset av lärares erfarenheter [Evidence and existence. Evidence-based teaching in the light of the experiences of teachers]. [Doctoral dissertation, Gothenburg university]. Acta universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborgs Universitet.
  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.
  • Magnusson, J., & Maunula, T. (2013). Variation av ett undervisningsinnehåll för att möjliggöra urskiljning av kritiska aspekter avseende begreppet densitet [Variation of a teaching content to enable the distinction of critical aspects regarding the concept of density]. ForskUL, 10, 82–105.
  • Mattsson, M. (2004). Att forska i praktiken: En kunskapsöversikt och en fallstudie [Researching the practice: A literature review and a case study]. Kunskapsföretaget.
  • McTaggart, R. (1994). Participatory action research: Issues in theory and practice. Educational Action Research, 2(3), 313–337.
  • Nersäter, A. (2019). Students’ understanding of historical sources – A composite ability. Nordidactica, 9(1), 105–131.
  • Noffke, S. E. (1997). Professional, personal and political dimensions of action research. Review of Research in Education, 22(1), 305–343.
  • Noffke, S. E. (2009). Revisiting the professional, personal and political dimensions of action research. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 6–23). Sage Publications.
  • Nordidactica (2020). https://www.kau.se/nordidactica/om-nordidactica/syfte-och-mal]
  • Nyberg, G. (2018). Att urskilja och erfara sitt sätt att springa – Kan elever lära sig det i idrott och hälsa? [To distinguish and experience one’s way of running – Can students learn that in physical education?]. ForskUL, 6(1), 43–63.
  • Palmér, H., & Johansson, M. (2018). Combining entrepreneurship and mathematics in primary school – What happens? Education Inquiry, 9(2), 1–16.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Persson, A., & Persson, J. (2017). Vetenskaplig grund och beprövad erfarenhet i högre utbildning och skola [Scientific knowledge and proven experience]. Vetenskap Och Beprövad Erfarenhet: Skola, 39–48. Lunds universitet.
  • Persson, A. (2020). Dubbel närhet och distans behövs inom praktiknära forskning [Double closeness and distance needed in practice-near research]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 25(2–3), 149–152.
  • Persson, L., Lundegård, P., & Wickman, P.-O. (2011). Worry becomes hope in education for sustainable development – An action research study at a secondary school. Utbildning & Demokrati, 20(1), 123–144.
  • Prøitz, T., Rye, E. M., Barstad, K., Afdal, H., Risan, M., & Aasen, P. (2020). Utbildning, lärande, forskning: En evalueringsstudie – Delrapport 2 [Education, learning, research: an evaluation study – interim report 2]. Sørost-Norge.
  • Rönnerman, K., & Salo, P. (2012). ‘Collaborative and action research’ within education – A Nordic perspective. Nordic Studies in Education 01(32), 32(1), 1–16.
  • Rönnerman, K., & Salo, P. (2017). Action research within the tradition of Nordic countries. In The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research, eds. L.L. Rowell, C.D. Bruce, J.M. Shosh, & M. Riel. (pp. 455–469). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rönnerman, K. (2018). Vikten av teori i praktiknära forskning: Exemplet aktionsforskning och teorin om praktikarkitekturer [The importance of theory in practice-near research: The example action research and the theory of practice architectures]. Utbildning & Lärande, 12(1), 41–54.
  • Roos, H.-E. (2021). Kroksbäck, den vita staden – En aktionsforskare minns [Kroksbäck, the white city – An action researcher remembers. In I. Bosseldal, J. Lundberg, & M. Malmström (Eds.) Ögonblick: En vänbok till Anders Persson om människor och deras möten (pp. 183–202). Lunds universitet.
  • Serder, M., & Malmström, M. (2020). Vad talar vi om när vi talar om praktiknära forskning? [What are we talking about when talking about practice-near research?]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 25(1), 106–109. https://doi.org/10.15626/pfs25.01.07
  • Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5–21.
  • SOU 1980:2. Skolforskning och skolutveckling: Betänkande [School research and school development: report]. https://weburn.kb.se/metadata/828/SOU_8350828.htm
  • SOU 2016:38. Samling för skolan: Nationella målsättningar och utvecklingsområden för kunskap och likvärdighet: Delbetänkande [Gathering for school: National objectives and development areas for knowledge and equality: Interim report]. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2016/05/sou-201638/
  • SOU 2017:35. Samling för skolan: Nationell strategi för kunskap och likvärdighet: Slutbetänkande [Gathering for school: National strategy for knowledge and equality: Final report]. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2017/04/sou-201735/
  • SOU 2018:19. Forska tillsammans: Samverkan för lärande och förbättring [Do research together: Collaboration for learning and improvement]. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2018/03/forska-tillsammans--samverkan-for-larande-och-forbattring/
  • SOU 2018:17. Med undervisningsskicklighet i centrum: ett ramverk för lärares och rektorers professionella utveckling [Focusing teaching skills: a framework for the professional development of teachers and principals]. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2018/03/sou-201817/
  • Stenhouse, L. (1988). Artistry and teaching: The teacher as focus of research and development. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(3), 43–51.
  • Sundler, M., Dudas, C., & Anderhag, P. (2017). Från missförstånd till klarhet: Hur kan undervisningen organiseras för att stötta elevers förståelse för växthuseffekten? [From misunderstanding to clarity: How can teaching be organized to support students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect?]. ForskUL, 5(2), 6–29.
  • Swedish Institute for Educational Research [Skolforskningsinstitutet], SKOLFI (2020). Forskningsprofil [Research profile], https://www.skolfi.se/forskningsfinansiering/forskningsprofil/ [20200424]
  • Swedish National Agency for Education. [Skolverket], SNAE (2014). Research for classrooms: Scientific knowledge and proven experience in practice, Stockholm: Skolverket
  • Swedish Research Council (2010). Forskningskommunikation och publiceringsmönster inom utbildningsvetenskap. En studie av svensk utbildningsvetenskaplig forskning vid tre lärosäten [Research communication and patterns of publication in educational sciences. A study of Swedish educational sciences at three universities]. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 10:2010.
  • Swepub (September, 2020). http://swepub.kb.se/?language=en
  • Thorsten, A., Wickman, M., Tunek, T., & Scheibel-Sahlin, M. (2019). “Det skulle kunna vara fakta, men det vet vi inte” – En studie om kritiskt förhållningssätt i gymnasieskolan [”It could be facts, but we do not know” – A study of critical attitudes in upper secondary school]. ForskUL, 7(2), 6–25.
  • ULF-avtal [ULF agreement] (2020). https://www.ulfavtal.se/ [20200423]
  • Varga, P. (2016). Frågan som didaktiskt verktyg – En studie av textsamtal kring skönlitteratur i årskurs 6 och 7 [The question as a didactic tool - a study of text conversations around fiction in grades 6 and 7]. ForskUL, 4(3), 24–45.
  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.
  • Wennergren, A.-C. (2016). Teachers as learners – With a little help from a critical friend. Educational Action Research, 24(2), 260–279.
  • Wright, P. (2020). Developing an empowering school curriculum: A renewed focus on action research. London Review of Education, 18(3), 323–338.
  • Wyse, D., Brown, C., Oliver, S., & Poblete, X. (2018). The BERA close-to-practice research project: Research report. British Educational Research Association.
  • Zeichner, K. M., & Noffke, S. E. (2001). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 298–330). American Educational Research Association.