A review of research on teaching of computer programming in primary school mathematics: moving towards sustainable classroom action

References

• Arfé, B., Vardanega, T., & Ronconi, L. (2020). The effects of coding on children’s planning and inhibition skills. Computers & Education, 148, Article 103807. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balanskat, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2015, October). Computing our future. Computer programming and coding: Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. Update 2015. Brussels, Belgium: European Schoolnet. http://www.eun.org/documents/411753/817341/Computing+our+future_final_2015.pdf/d3780a64-1081-4488-8549-6033200e3c03
   Google Scholar
• Barefoot, (2022). Computational thinking focus in the Barefoot project. https://barefootcas.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Battelle for Kids. (2015). Partnership for 21st century learning: 21st century student outcomes. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2015, July 6). BBC and partners unveil the landmark BBC micro:bit. https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/mediapacks/microbit
   Google Scholar
• Benton, L., Hoyles, C., Kalas, I., & Noss, R. (2017). Bridging primary programming and mathematics: Some findings of design research in England. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 115–138. doi:10.1007/s40751-017-0028-x.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, L., Kalas, I., Saunders, P., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2018). Beyond jam sandwiches and cups of tea: An exploration of primary pupils’ algorithm-evaluation strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 590–601. doi:10.1111/jcal.12266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, L., Saunders, P., Kalas, I., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2018). Designing for learning mathematics through programming: A case study of pupils engaging with place value. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.12.004.
   Google Scholar
• Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., & Earp, J. (2018, January). The Nordic approach to introducing computational thinking and programming in compulsory education. European Schoolnet.https://www.itd.cnr.it/doc/CompuThinkNordic.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Børne- Og Undervisningsministeriet. (2021). Erfaringerne fra forsøg med teknologiforståelse i folkeskolen er landet [Experiences from piloting understanding of technology in compulsory school]. https://www.uvm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/uvm/2021/okt/211004-erfaringerne-fra-forsoeg-med-teknologiforstaaelse-i-folkeskolen-er-landet
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American educational research association, Vancouver, Canada (Vol. 1, p. 25).
   Google Scholar
• Çakiroğlu, Ü., Suiçmez, S. S., Kurtoğlu, Y. B., Sari, A., Yildiz, S., & Öztürk, M. (2018). Exploring perceived cognitive load in learning programming via Scratch. Research in Learning Technology Article 1888, 26. doi:10.25304/rlt.v26.1888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlborg, N., Tyrén, M., Heath, C., & Eriksson, E. (2019). The scope of autonomy when teaching computational thinking in primary school. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 21, 130–139. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, M., Giang, C., Piatti, A., & Mondada, F. (2020). Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: A model for creative computational problem solving. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), Article 39. doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00238-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dağ, F. (2019). Prepare pre-service teachers to teach computer programming skills at K-12 level: Experiences in a course. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(2), 277–313. doi:10.1007/s40692-019-00137-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danmarks radio. (n.d.). ultra:bit. https://www.dr.dk/skole/ultrabit
   Google Scholar
• Dickes, A. C., Farris, A. V., & Sengupta, P. (2020). Sociomathematical norms for integrating coding and modeling with elementary science: A dialogical approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 35–52. doi:10.1007/s10956-019-09795-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durak, H. Y., Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Computational thinking, programming self-efficacy, problem solving and experiences in the programming process conducted with robotic activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 173–197. doi:10.30935/cet.554493.
   Google Scholar
• Erümit, A. K. (2020). Effects of different teaching approaches on programming skills. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1013–1037. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-10010-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidai, A., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). “Scratch”-ing computational thinking with Arduino: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100726. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100726. Article 100726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fokides, E. (2017). Students learning to program by developing games: Results of a year-long project in primary school settings. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 475–505. doi:10.28945/3893.
   Google Scholar
• Forsström, S. E., & Kaufmann, O. T. (2018). A literature review exploring the use of programming in mathematics education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(12), 18–32. doi:10.26803/ijlter.17.12.2.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L., Manganelli, A. M., & Ferrin, G. (2020). Arts and crafts robots or LEGO® MINDSTORMS robots? A comparative study in educational robotics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09609-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haara, F. O., Engelsen, K. S., & Smith, K. (2020). Moving from traditional to responsive mathematics classrooms: A proposition of an intervention model. Teacher Development, 24(3), 399–414. doi:10.1080/13664530.2020.1763443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenfeld, Z. R., Govind, M., De Ruiter, L. E., & Umashi Bers, M. (2020). If you can program, you can write: Learning introductory programming across literacy levels. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 65–85. doi:10.28945/4509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickmott, D., Prieto-Rodriguez, E., & Holmes, K. (2018). A scoping of studies on computational thinking in K-12 mathematics classrooms. Mathematics and Programming, 4, 48–69. doi:10.1007/s40751-017-0038-8.
   Google Scholar
• Humble, N., Mozelius, P., & Sällvin, L. (2020). Remaking and reinforcing mathematics and technology with programming – Teacher perceptions of challenges, opportunities and tools in K-12 settings. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(5), 309–321. doi:10.1108/IJILT-02-2020-0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iskrenovic-Momcilovic, O. (2019). Pair programming with scratch. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 2943–2952. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09905-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, M., Pearson, J. N., Tapia, T., Wherfel, Q. M., & Reese, G. (2015). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 263–279. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalelioǧlu, F. (2015). A new way of teaching programming skills to K-12 students: Code.org. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 200–210. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalelioǧlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2014). The effects of teaching programming via Scratch on problem solving skills: A discussion from learners’ perspective. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kalelioglu, F., & Sentance, S. (2020). Teaching with physical computing in school: The case of the micro:bit. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2577–2603. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-10080-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., Pavlov, D., & Myradov, M. (2020). Features of using KODU game lab in teaching programming. Mathematics and Informatics, 63(1), 9–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, O. T., & Stenseth, B. (2020). Programming in mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. Advance online publication. 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1736349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14–31. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet. (2013) NOU 2013: 2. Hindre for digital verdiskapning [NOU 2013: 2. Obstacles to digital value creation]. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/e2f0d5676e144305967f21011b715c16/no/pdfs/nou201320130002000dddpd
   Google Scholar
• Kong, S.-C., Lai, M., & Sun, D. (2020). Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 151, Article 103872. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, S.-C., & Wang, Y.-Q. (2019). Nurture interest-driven creators in programmable robotics education: An empirical investigation in primary school settings. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), Article 20. doi:10.1186/s41039-019-0116-1
   Google Scholar
• Kucuk, S., & Sisman, B. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ experiences in learning robotics design and programming. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 301–320. doi:10.15388/infedu.2018.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambić, D., Đorić, B., & Ivakić, S. (2020). Investigating the effect of the use of code.org on younger elementary school students’ attitudes towards programming. Behaviour & Information Technology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2020.1781931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, S. L., & Rich, P. J. (2020). Development and analysis of the elementary student coding attitudes survey. Computers & Education, 153, Article 103898. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenović, M., Boljat, I., & Žanko, Ž. (2018). Comparing loops misconceptions in block-based and text-based programming languages at the K-12 level. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1483–1500. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9673-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardelli, E. (2019). Do we really need computational thinking? Communications of the ACM, 62(2), 32–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington DC, United States of America: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13398
   Google Scholar
• Noh, J., & Lee, J. (2020). Effects of robotics programming on the computational thinking and creativity of elementary school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 463–484. doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09708-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö. (2018). Tasa-arvoisen peruskoulun tulevaisuus [Ministry of Education and Culture: The Future of Equal Basic Education]. http://urn.fi/
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Marin, D., Hijon-Neira, R., & Martin-Lope, M. (2018). A methodology proposal based on metaphors to teach programming to children. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 13(1), 46–53. doi:10.1109/RITA.2018.2809944.
   Google Scholar
• Piedade, J., Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Matos, J. F. (2020). On teaching programming fundamentals and computational thinking with educational robotics: A didactic experience with pre-service teachers. Education Sciences, 10(9) Article 214, 214. doi:10.3390/educsci10090214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psycharis, S., & Kotzampasaki, E. (2019). The impact of a STEM inquiry game learning scenario on computational thinking and computer self-confidence. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(4), Article em1689. doi:10.29333/ejmste/103071
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P. J., Browning, S. F., Perkins, M., Shoop, T., Yoshikawa, E., & Belikov, O. M. (2019). Coding in K-8: International trends in teaching elementary/primary computing. TechTrends, 63(3), 311–329. doi:10.1007/s11528-018-0295-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ríos Félix, J. M., Zatarain Cabada, R., & Barrón Estrada, M. L. (2020). Teaching computational thinking in Mexico: A case study in a public elementary school. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5087–5101. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10213-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2017). Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies from a teacher’s perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 469–495. doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9482-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentance, S., & Waite, J. (2018). Computing in the classroom: Tales from the chalkface. It - Information Technology, 60(2), 103–112. doi:10.1515/itit-2017-0014.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2019). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet [Curriculum for compulsory school, preschool and after-school activity]. https://www.skolverket.se/getFile?file=4206
   Google Scholar
• Stigberg, H., & Stigberg, S. (2020). Teaching programming and mathematics in practice: A case study from a Swedish primary school. Policy Futures in Education, 18(4), 483–496. doi:10.1177/1478210319894785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taraldsen, L. H., & Myhra, K. S. (2019). Programmering med Spheroballer [Programming with Sphero balls]. Tangenten – Tidsskrift for Matematikkundervisning, 3, 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2020). Læreplanverket [National curriculum]. https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2022). Algoritmisk tenkning [Computational thinking]. https://www.udir.no/kvalitet-og-kompetanse/profesjonsfaglig-digital-kompetanse/algoritmisk-tenkning/
   Google Scholar
• Uzumcu, O., & Bay, E. (2020). The effect of computational thinking skill program design developed according to interest driven creator theory on prospective teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 565–583. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10268-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnervik, P. (2020). Implementing programming in school mathematics and technology: Teachers’ intrinsic and extrinsic challenges. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09602-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitensenterforeningen. (n.d.). super:bit skole [super:bit school]. https://www.vitensenter.no/superbit/
   Google Scholar
• Waite, J., Curzon, P., Marsh, W., & Sentance, S. (2020). Difficulties with design: The challenges of teaching design in K-5 programming. Computers & Education, 150. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103838, Article 103838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2016). The 10 skills you need to thrive in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-10-skills-you-need-to-thrive-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2016). Expanding computer science education in schools: Understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 235–254. doi:10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yallihep, M., & Kutlu, B. (2020). Mobile serious games: Effects on students’ understanding of programming concepts and attitudes towards information technology. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1237–1254. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-10008-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar