10,326
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Teacher–student relationships and students’ self-efficacy beliefs. Rationale, validation and further potential of two instruments

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Allodi Westling, M. (2013). Simple-minded accountability measures create failure schools in disadvantaged contexts: A case study of a Swedish junior high school. Policy Futures in Education, 11(4), 331–363.
  • Ashan, S., & Smith, W. C. (2016). Facilitating student learning: A comparison of classroom and accountability assessment. In W. C. Smith (Ed.), The global testing culture. Shaping education policy, perceptions, and practice (pp. 131–151). Providence, Rhpde Island: Symposium Books.
  • Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control. A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
  • Baker, J. A. (2006). Contributions of teacher–child relationships to positive school adjustment during elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 44(3), 211–229.
  • Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development (pp. 1–60). Greenwich: JAI Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1990). Multidimensional scales of perceived self-efficacy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
  • Bandura, A. (2005). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 305–337). Charlotte, North Carolina.
  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206–1222.
  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children´s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206.
  • Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400–404.
  • Biesta, G. (2004). Mind the gap. In C. Bingham & A. M. Sidorkin (Eds.), No education without relation (pp. 11–22). New York: Peter Lang Publisher.
  • Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy (1st ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge.
  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge.
  • Braun, A. (2017). Education policy and the intensification of teachers’ work: The changing professional culture of teaching in England and implications for social justice. In S. Parker, K. N. Gulson, & T. Gale (Eds.), Policy and inequality in education (pp. 169–185). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  • Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Griffin, B. W. (2001). Exploratory analysis of the structure of scores from the multidimensional scales of perceived self-efficacy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(3), 475–489.
  • de Vijver, F. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1(2), 89–99.
  • Dhamani, K., & Richter, M. (2011). Translation of research instruments: Research processes, pitfalls and challenges. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 13(1), 3–13.
  • Drugli, M. B., & Hjemdal, O. (2013). Factor structure of the student–teacher relationship scale for Norwegian school-age children explored with confirmatory factor analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(5), 457–466.
  • Fertman, C. I., & Primack, B. A. (2009). Elementary student self-efficacy scale. Development and validation focused on student learning, peer relations, and resisting drug use. Journal of Drug Education, 39(1), 23–38.
  • Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children’s perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21(6), 1016–1024.
  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student-teacher relationships. In Bear & Minke (Eds.), Children´s needs III: Development, prevention and intervention (pp. 49–59). Washington DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning – a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
  • Hughes, J. N. (2011). Longitudinal effects of teacher and student perceptions of teacher-student relationship qualities on academic adjustment. Elementary School Journal, 112(1), 38–60.
  • Hughes, J., & Kwok, O. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achieving readers’ engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 39–51.
  • Hughes, J. N., Wu, J.-Y., Kwok, O.-M., Villarreal, V., & Johnson, A. Y. (2012). Indirect effects of child reports of teacher-student relationship on achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 350–365.
  • Klassen, R. M. (2010). Confidence to manage learning: The self-efficacy for self-regulated learning of early adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 19–30.
  • Koomen, H., & Jellesma, F. (2015). Can closeness, conflict, and dependency be used to characterize students’ perceptions of the affective relationship with their teacher? Testing a new child measure in middle childhood. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 479–497.
  • Li, Y., Hughes, J. N., Kwok, O., & Hsu, H.-Y. (2012). Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of child, teacher, and peer reports of teacher–student support. Psychological Assessment, 24(1), 54–65.
  • Majbar, M. A. (2019). Validation of the French translation of the Dutch residency educational climate test. BMC Medical Education, 2020(20), 338.
  • Martin, D. P., & Rimm-Kauffman, S. E. (2015). Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math? Journal of School Psychology, 53, 359–373.
  • Murray, C., Waas, G. A., & Murray, K. M. (2008). Child race and gender as moderators of the association between teacher–child relationships and school adjustment. Psychology in the Schools, 45(6), 562–578.
  • O’Connor, E. E., Dearing, E., & Collins, B. A. (2011). Teacher-child relationship and behavior problem trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 120–162.
  • Patricio, J. N., Barata, M. C., Calheiros, M. M., & Graca, J. (2015). A Portuguese version of the student-teacher relationship scale - short form. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18(30), 1–12.
  • Pianta, R. C., & Nimetz, S. L. (1991). Relationships between children and teachers: Associations with home and classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 12(3), 379–393.
  • Roorda, D. L., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach, 37. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529.
  • Singh, K., Junnarkar, M., & Kaur, J. (2016). Measures of positive psygohology. development and validation. New Delhi: Springer India.
  • Telli, S., & den Brok, P. (2012). Teacher-student interpersonal behaviour in the Turkish primary to higher education context. In D. B. Wubbels, van Tartwijk, & Levy (Eds.), Interpersonal relationships in education. An overview of contemporary research (pp. 187–206). Sense Publisher: Rotterdam.
  • Ubha, N., & Cahill, S. (2014). Building secure attachments for primary school children: A mixed methods study. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30(3), 272–292.
  • Usher, L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning. A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 443–463.
  • Washington University (2012). Research measures of social work. George Warren Brown school of social work. Downloaded 201212. Washington University. St. Louis.
  • Weiss, R. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. In Z. Rubin (Ed.), Doing unto others (pp. 17–26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Wentzel, K. R. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and adolescent competence at school. In T. Wubbels, P. den Brok, J. van Tartwijk, & J. Levy (Eds.), Interpersonal Relationships in Education (pp. 19–36). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Wesson, C. J., & Derrer-Rendall, N. (2011). Self-beliefs and student goal achievement. Psychology Teaching Review, 17(1), 3–12.
  • Wu, J., Hughes, J. N., & Kwok, O. (2010). Teacher-student relationship quality type in elementary grades: Effects on trajectories for achievement and engagement. Journal of School Psychology, 48(5), 357–387.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676.
  • Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., Luengo Kanacri, B., Di Giunta, L., Milioni, M., & Caprara, G. (2013). Academic achievement: The unique contribution of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning beyond intelligence, personality traits, and self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 158–162.