Performance-based accountability: exploring Ghanaian teachers perception of the influence of large-scale testing on teaching and learning

References

• Adane, L. O. (2013). Factors affecting low academic achievement of pupils in Kemp Methodist Junior High School in Aburi, Eastern region (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghana).
   Google Scholar
• Amoako, I. (2019). What’s at stake in high-stakes testing in Ghana: Implication for curriculum implementation in basic schools. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(3), 72.
   Google Scholar
• Ananda, E., & Ashadi, A. (2021). High-stakes testing and English teachers’ role as materials developers: Insights from vocational high schools. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• Anane, E. (2015). Influence of accountability pressure on science, mathematics and English language teachers’ classroom practice in senior high school in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Education, Issues and Practices, 1, 44–63.
   Google Scholar
• Baidoo-Anu, D. (2018a). Perceived school environmental, home conditions and academic performance of junior high school students in Asikuma-Odoben-Brakwa district, Ghana. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 24(2), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Baidoo-Anu, D. (2018b). Students and teachers attitudes responsible for poor academic performance of junior high school students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Baidoo-Anu, D. (2022). Between-school streaming: Unpacking the experiences of secondary school teachers and students in category C schools in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100–188.
   Google Scholar
• Baidoo-Anu, D., & Adomaa Acquah, P. (2021). Social challenges of adolescent secondary school students in Ghana: Evidence from Cape Coast schools. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 26(1), 529–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baidoo-Anu, D., Asamoah, D., Gyamerah, K., Asare, E., & Quainoo, A. E. (Forthcoming). Tracking students increase or decrease achievement gap? Comparing academic performance of high and low streamed secondary schools in Ghana.
   Google Scholar
• Baidoo-Anu, D., Gyamerah, K., & Chanimbe, T. (2022). Secondary school categorization in Ghana: Silent plights of students and implications for equitable learning. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 1–18. doi:10.1080/10911359.2022.2061665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baidoo-Anu, D., & Mensah, G. E. (2018). The perceptions of junior high school students and teachers towards teaching and learning of integrated science at Komenda-Edina-Eguafo-Abrim district. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Barksdale-Ladd, M. A., & Thomas, K. F. (2000). What’s at stake in high-stakes testing: Teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 384–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergbauer, B. A., Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2018). Testing. NBER Working Paper No. 24836. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. 2010 Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment: Formative assessment is an essential component of classroom work and can raise student achievement. Phi Delta Kappan Sept. 2010, p. 81+. Gale OneFile: CPI.Q (Canadian Periodicals).https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A237749007/CPI?u=queensulaw&sid=CPI&xid=25782744. Accessed 18 Oct. 2019
   Google Scholar
• Bracey, G. W. (2000). The TIMSS “final year” study and report: A critique. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Brill, F., Grayson, H., Kuhn, L., & O’Donnell, S. (2018). What impact does accountability have on curriculum,standards and engagement in education? A literature review. NFER. Accessed 09/01/2020 from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/media/3032/nfer_accountability_literature_review_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Browne, E. (2016). Evidence on Formative Classroom Assessment for Learning. K4D Helpdesk Report. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, J. M., & Krueger, M. (2003). A balanced approach to high-stakes achievement testing: An analysis of the literature with policy implications. : International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning 7(4), 1-20.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. Abingdon UK: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, P. J., & Chea, H. (2016). South Korea’s accountability policy system and national achievement test. In W. C. Smith (Ed.), The global testing culture: Shaping education policy, perceptions, and practice (pp. 249–260). Oxford, England: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1989). Accountability for professional practice. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 59–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wilhoit, G., & Pittenger, L. (2014). Accountability for college and career readiness: Developing a new paradigm. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(86), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D. M., & Bolt, S. E. (2008). Challenges and opportunities for promoting student achievement through large-scale assessment results: Research, reflections, and future directions. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34(1), 43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonton (2005). Accountability in Education. Revtrieved on 23 July from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj0xqyC0K_5AhVTKkQIHUOgBwYQFnoECAMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.teachers.ab.ca%2FSiteCollectionDocuments%2FATA%2FIssues%2520In%2520Education%2FEmerging%2520Issues%2FAccountability%2520Discussion%2520Paper.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0VVUuZfrSH1LsiSJMx4pLN
   Google Scholar
• Elbousty, Y. (2009). High stakes testing literature review and critique.NERA Conference Proceedings 2009. 16.https://opencommons.uconn.edu/nera_2009/16
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Londo: sage.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School Accountability. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbooks in Economics (Vol. 3, pp. 383–421). Netherlands: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W., & Shipps, D. (2007). Orchestration, coherence and the problem of conflicting accountabilities. Managing Change in the Public Services, 212.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, R. (2011). Pass or Fail: Assessing contemporary educational reform. Social Alternatives, 30(4), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. (2003). Accountability in modern government. Handbook of Public Administration, 557–568.
   Google Scholar
• Grupe, D., & Nitschke, J. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety. An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 14(7), 488–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., & Koretz, D. (2002). Tests and their use in test-based accountability systems. In L. Hamilton, B. Stecher, & S. Klein (Eds.), Making sense of test-based accountability in education. Santa Monica: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G.R., Stapleton, L.M., & Mueller, R.O. (Eds.). (2018). The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). New York:Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755649
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2020). Large-scale assessments and their effects: The case of mid-stakes tests in Ontario. Journal of Educational Change, 21(3), 393–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. 10(2), 169–207.
   Google Scholar
• Hesketh, T., Zhen, Y., Lu, L., Dong, Z., Jun, Y., & Xing, Z. (2010). Stress and psychosomatic symptoms in Chinese school children: Cross-sectional survey. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 95(2), 136–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. E. (2012). Asia-Pacific education system review series no. 5: Student learning assessment. Hong Kong, China: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. V., Assaf, L. C., & Paris, S. G. (2001). High-stakes testing in reading: Today in Texas, tomorrow? The Reading Teacher, 54(5), 482–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2007). Hopmann, S. T. (2007). No Child, No School, No State Left Behind: Comparative Research in the Age of Accountability. In Hopmann, S. T. (). Hopmann, S. T. (S. T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, and M. RetzlHopmann, S. T. (). Hopmann, S. T. (S. T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, and M. RetzlEds.), PISA According to PISA (pp. 363–415). Vienna: Lit-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheson, G. D., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. London:Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jerrim, J., & Sims, S. (2021). School accountability and teacher stress: International evidence from the OECD TALIS study. Education Assessment Evaluation Acc. doi:10.1007/s11092-021-09360-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2007). Learning to take tests or learning for understanding? Teachers’ beliefs about test-based accountability. New Yor: The Educational Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Kellaghan, T., Greaney, V., & Murray, S. (2009). Using the results of a national assessment of educational achievement (Vol. 5). WashWashington DC: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia, 1(36). doi:10.1186/2229-0443-1-3-36
   Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. (2011). Assessment for learning in the accountability era: Queensland, Australia. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 78–83.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, D. A., DeLuca, C., & Miller, T. (2008). The evolving culture of large-scale assessments in Canadian education. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 76, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, D. A., & Rogers, W. T. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of large-scale assessment programs within low-stakes accountability frameworks. International Journal of Testing, 11(2), 122–143.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. (2000). The case against standardized testing: Raising the scores. In Ruining the schools (pp. 1–25). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Lewis, S. (2017). Accountabilities in schools and school systems. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.74
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Luo, L., & Tang, W. (2021). Kindergarten teachers’ experiences of stress under a high-stake inspection regime: An exploration in the Chinese context. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddolyn, R. (2016). The impact of high-stakes testing on the learning environment. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/658
   Google Scholar
• Marchant, G. J., & Paulson, S. E. (2005). The relationship of high school graduation exams to graduation rates and SAT scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, 6.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. (2005). The Impact of High-Stakes Test Results on Teachers' Instructional and Classroom Assessment Practices. Online Submission. Retrieved on 9 May from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490648
   Google Scholar
• Mika, S. (2005). Testing testing: Do schools do too much. Retrieved from Gallup, Inc. website http://www.gallup.com/poll/19552/testing-testing-schools-too-much.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2008). Why has high-stakes testing so easily slipped into contemporary American life? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(9), 672–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2013). Acting on principle: An essay on Kantian ethics. UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oduro, O. E. (2015). Assessment in mathematics classrooms in Ghana: A study of teachers’ practices. Sussex: University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedulla, J. J., Abrams, L. M., Madaus, G. F., Russell, M. K., Ramos, M. A., & Miao, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED481836.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, G., & Wellman, N. (2008). The impact of high-stakes testing: Recommendations for professional school counselors and other support personnel. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal, 6(4), 15.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., & Calvert, G. (2019). What motivates people to teach, and why do they leave? Accountability, performativity and teacher retention. British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (1999). Why standardized tests don’t measure educational quality. Educational Leadership, 56, 8–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2003). Test better, teach better: The instructional role of assessment. USA: Ascd.
   Google Scholar
• Prytula, M., Noonan, B., & Hellsten, L. (2013). Toward instructional leadership: Principals’ perceptions of large-scale assessment in schools. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 140, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, K., Seraj, P. M. I., Hasan, M., Namaziandost, E., & Tilwani, S. A. (2021). Washback of assessment on English teaching-learning practice at secondary schools. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ritt, M. (2016). The impact of high-stakes testing on the learning environment. Social Work Master’s Clinical Research Papers. 669. https://ir.stthomas.edu/ssw_mstrp/669
   Google Scholar
• Roderick, M., Jacob, B. A., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). The impact of high-stakes testing in Chicago on student achievement in promotional gate grades. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 333–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotberg, I. C., Bernstein, K. J., & Ritter, S. B. (2001). No child left behind: Views about the potential impact of the Bush Administration’s education proposals. USA: Center for Curriculum, Standards, and Technology, Institute for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R., Jacobsen, R., & Wilder, T. (2008). Grading education: Getting accountability right. NY: Teachers College Press and the Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2010). The secret to Finland’s success: Educating teachers. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education, 2, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Amick, B. (1989). Electronic monitoring at the workplace: Implications for employee control and job stress. In S. L. Sauter, J. J. Hurrell Jr, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Job Control and Worker Health (pp. 275–289). UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B. M. (2002). Consequences of large-scale, high-stakes testing on school and classroom practice. Making Sense of test-based Accountability in Education, 79–100.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. (2009). Can high-stakes testing leverage educational improvement? Prospects from the last decade of testing and accountability reform. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 211–227.
   Google Scholar
• Suspitsyna, T. (2010). Accountability in American education as a rhetoric and a technology of governmentality. Journal of Education Policy, 25(5), 567–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. (2001). The Authentic Standards Movement and its Evil Twin. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 358–362. doi:10.1177/003172170108200504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volante, L. (2006). An alternative vision for large-scale assessment in Canada. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4(1). doi:10.22329/jtl.v4i1.89
   Google Scholar
• von Zastrow, C. E., & Janc, H. (2004). Academic atrophy: The condition of the liberal arts in America’s public schools.Washington DC: Council for Basic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. W. (2000). Monte carlo PCA for parallel analysis [Programa informático]. State College, PA: Ed and Psych Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2015). Lessons that matter: What we should learn from Asian school systems. Retrieved on August 23, 2021 from http://www.mitchellinstitute.org.au/reports/lessons-that-matter-what-should-we-learn-from-asias-schoolsystems/
   Google Scholar