A systematic review of risks and benefits with nipple-areola-reconstruction

References

• Farhadi J, Maksvytyte GK, Schaefer DJ, et al. Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex: an update. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:40–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccola MA, Savage J, Rozen WM, et al. Surgical correction and reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex: current review of techniques. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010;26:589–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams W. Labial transplant for correction of loss of the nipple. Plast Reconstr Surg 1946;4:295–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winocour S, Saksena A, Oh C, et al. A systematic review of comparison of autologous, allogeneic, and synthetic augmentation grafts in nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:14e–23e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskenazi L. A one-stage nipple reconstruction with the modified flap and immediate tattoo: a review of 100 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:671–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeweyer E, Hertens D, Nogaret JM, Deraemaecker R. Immediate breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants: no interference with the oncologic outcome? Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1409–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh SC, Martin NA, Pandya AN, Cutress RI. Patient satisfaction following nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and tattooing. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:360–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinfeld AB, Somia N, Codner MA. Purse-string nipple areolar reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008;61:364–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear SL, Arias J. Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing. Ann Plast Surg 1995;35:232–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CP, Gdalevitch P, Strazar R, et al. Surgical tips: areolar tattoo prior to nipple reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:1724–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltaci V, Kilic A. A new application for reconstruction of areola with transplantation of cultured autologous melanocytes. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:1056–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao YL, Lach E, Kim TH, et al. Tissue-engineered nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:2293–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck DW, 2nd., Shenaq D, Heyer K, et al. Patient-subjective cosmetic outcomes following the varying stages of tissue expander breast reconstruction: the importance of completion. Breast 2010;19:521–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW, 3rd. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:699–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:457–63. discussion 64–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little JW, 3rd. Nipple-areola reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1984;11:351–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schueler S, Schuetz GM, Dewey M. The revised QUADAS-2 tool. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2009 guidelines Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine; 2009 [cited 2016]. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/
   Google Scholar
• Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations. Evid Based Med 2008;13:162–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubino C, Dessy LA, Posadinu AA. Modified technique for nipple reconstruction: the 'arrow flap'. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56:247–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Momeni A, Ghaly M, Gupta D, et al. Nipple reconstruction: risk factors and complications after 189 procedures. Eur J Plast Surg 2013;36:633–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Otterburn DM, Sikora KE, Losken A. An outcome evaluation following postmastectomy nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique. Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:574–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin F, Bruant-Rodier C, Lutz JC, et al. [Reconstruction of the nipple-areolar complex: long-term results]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2008;53:334–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satteson ES, Reynolds MF, Bond AM, Pestana IA. An analysis of complication risk factors in 641 nipple reconstructions. Breast J 2016;22:379–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean NR, Neild T, Haynes J, et al. Fading of nipple-areolar reconstructions: the last hurdle in breast reconstruction? Br J Plast Surg 2002;55:574–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zenn MR, Garofalo JA. Unilateral nipple reconstruction with nipple sharing: time for a second look. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1648–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Ali K, Dalal M, Kat CC. Modified C-V flap for nipple reconstruction: our results in 50 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:991–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, et al. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:780–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong T, Antony A, Cordeiro P. Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg 2009;62:591–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter DF, Reichenberger MA, Faymonville C. [Comparison of the nipple projection after reconstruction with three different methods]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2004;36:374–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ludolph I, Horch RE, Harlander M, et al. Is there a rationale for autologous breast reconstruction in older patients? A retrospective single center analysis of quality of life, complications and comorbidities after DIEP or ms-TRAM flap using the BREAST-Q. Breast J 2015;21:588–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, de Blacam C, et al. The impact of nipple reconstruction on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012;69:389–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade WN, Baxter N, Semple JL. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:46–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplund O. Nipple and areola reconstruction. A study in 79 mastectomized women. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;17:233–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosdidier A, Lebeau J, Ochala C, et al. [Double flag flap nipple reconstruction. Clinical evaluation on 70 cases]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2014;59:123–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa MP, Ferreira MC. Aesthetic quality of the nipple-areola complex in breast reconstruction with a new local graft technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:774–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ, et al. Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1602–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D. Filler injection enhances the projection of the reconstructed nipple: an original easy technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;29:287–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisti A, Grimaldi L, Tassinari J, et al. Nipple-areola complex reconstruction techniques: A literature review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42:441–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng MH, Rodriguez ED, Smartt JM, Cardenas-Mejia A. Nipple reconstruction using the modified top hat flap with banked costal cartilage graft: long-term follow-up in 58 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2007;59:621–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germano D, De Biasio F, Piedimonte A, Parodi PC. Nipple reconstruction using the fleur-de-lis flap technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006;30:399–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra AB, Khoobehi K, Metzinger SE, Allen RJ. New technique for nipple areola reconstruction: arrow flap and rib cartilage graft for long-lasting nipple projection. Ann Plast Surg 2003;50:31–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullo P, Buccheri EM, Pozzi M, De Vita R. Nipple reconstruction using a star flap enhanced by scar tissue: the Regina Elena Cancer Institute experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011;35:731–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney BP, Hodde JP, Changkuon DI. Biologic collagen cylinder with skate flap technique for nipple reconstruction. Plast Surg Int 2014;2014:194087.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Few JW, Marcus JR, Casas LA, et al. Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1321–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra R, Miglietta AM, Abonante S, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast and nipple reconstruction: a new technique of nipple reconstruction. Plast Surg Int 2013;2013:406375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harcourt D, Russell C, Hughes J, et al. Patient satisfaction in relation to nipple reconstruction: the importance of information provision. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:494–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar