Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 4. Speech outcomes in 5-year-olds - velopharyngeal competency and hypernasality

References

• Semb G, Enemark H, Friede H, et al. A Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 1. Planning and management. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2017;51:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson-Falzone SJ. The relationship between timing of cleft palate surgery and speech outcome: what have we learned, and where do we stand in the1990s? Sem Orthod 1996;2:185–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohmander, Surgical intervention and speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate. In: Howard S, Lohmander A, editors. Cleft palate speech: assessment and intervention. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. pp 55–85.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts CT, Semb G, Shaw WC. Strategies for the advancement of surgical methods in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:141–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander A, Olsson M. Methodology for perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt R, Sell D, Russell J, et al. Cleft palate speech dissected: a review of current knowledge and analysis. Br J Plast Surg 1996;49:143–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Britton L, Albery L, Bowden M, et al. A cross-sectional cohort study of speech in five-year-olds with cleft palate ± lip to support development of national audit standards. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2014;51:431–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander-Agerskov A, Söderpalm E, Friede H, Lilja J. A comparison of babbling and speech at pre-speech level, 3, and 5 years of age in children with cleft lip and palate treated with delayed hard palate closure. Folia Phoniatr Logop 1998;50:243–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell D, Grunwell P, Speech assessment and therapy. In: Watson ACH, Sell D, Grunwell P, editors. Management of Cleft Lip and Palate. London: Whurr; 2001. pp 258–85.
   Google Scholar
• Timmons MJ, Wyatt RA, Murphy T. Speech after repair of isolated cleft palate and cleft lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg 2001;54:377–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohmander A, Persson C, Owman-Moll P. Unoperated clefts in the hard palate: speech deficits at age 5 and 7 years and their relationship to size of the cleft. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2002;36:332–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigott RW, Albery EH, Hathorn IS, et al. A comparison of three methods of repairing the hard palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J 2002;39:383–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander A, Friede H, Elander A, et al. Speech development in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with different delays of hard palate closure after early velar repair: a longitudinal perspective. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2006;46:267–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander A, Persson C. A longitudinal study of speech production in Swedish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate and two-stage palatal repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008;45:32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havstam C, Lohmander A, Persson C, et al. Evaluation of VPI-assessment with videofluoroscopy and nasoendoscopy. Br J Plast Surg 2005;58:922–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohmander A, Friede H, Lilja J. Long-term, longitudinal follow-up of individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate after the Gothenburg primary early veloplasty and delayed hard palate closure protocol: speech outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012;49:657–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg J, Petersson P, Lohmander A. Speech outcomes at age 5 and 10 years in unilateral cleft lip and palate after one-stage palatal repair with minimal incision technique: a longitudinal perspective. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014;78:1662–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friede H, Lilja J, Lohmander A. Long-term, longitudinal follow-up of individuals with UCLP after the Gothenburg primary early veloplasty and delayed hard palate closure. 1. Growth outcome. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 2012;49:649–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther E, Wisser JR, Cohen MA, Brown AS. Palatoplasty: Furlow's double reversing Z-plasty versus intravelar veloplasty . Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:546–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerlad BC, Cleft palate repair. In: Losee JE, Kirschner RE, editors. Comprehensive Cleft Care. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill; 2008. pp 413–29.
   Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen J, Haapanen ML, Paaso M, et al. Velopharyngeal function from the age of three to eight years in cleft palate patients. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2001;53:93–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besell A, Sell D, Whiting P, et al. Speech and language therapy interventions for children with cleft palate: a systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2013;40:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutters B, Brønstedt K. Strategies in cleft palate speech-with special reference to Danish. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:126–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Folkins JW, Moon JB, Approaches to the study of speech production. In: Bardach J, Morris HL, editors. Multidisciplinary management of cleft lip and palate. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990. pp 707–17.
   Google Scholar
• Watterson T, Lewis K, Allord M, et al. Effect of vowel type on reliability of nasality ratings. J Commun Disord 2007;40:503–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zraick RI, Liss JM, Dorman MF, et al. Multidimensional scaling of nasal voice quality. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000;43:989–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnegård K, Lohmander AA. A cross-sectional study of speech in 10-year-old children with cleft palate: results and issues of rater reliability. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2007;44:33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent RD. Hearing and believing: some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1996;5:7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Kempster GB, et al. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:21–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerratt B, Kreiman J, Antonanzas-Barroso N, Berke G. Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:14–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karling J, Lohmander A, Serpa-Leitao de A, et al. NORAM: calibration and operational advice for measuring nasality in cleft palate patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;19:261–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnegård K, Lohmander A, van Doorn J. Untrained listeners’ ratings of speech deficits in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech pathologists’ ratings. Int J Lang Com Dis 2009;44:656–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis KE, Watterson TL, Houghton SM. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality. J Commun Disord 2003;36:49–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Whitehill T, Ciocca V. Effect of listener training on perceptual judgement of hypernasality. Clin Linguist Phon 2009;23:319–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klintö K, Salameh E-K, Svensson H, Lohmander A. The impact of speech material on speech judgement in children with and without cleft palate. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2011;46:348–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastav R, Sapienza CM, Nandur V. Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005;48:323–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams BJ, Morris LM, Shelton RL, Cleft Palate Speech Philadelphia: BC Decker Inc.; 1990. pp 338–9.
   Google Scholar
• John A, Sell D, Sweeney T, et al. The Cleft Audit Protocol for speech-augmented: a validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006;43:272–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero KN, Assessment of Cleft Palate Articulation and Resonance in Familiar and Unfamiliar Languages: English, Spanish, and Hmong. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Minnesota, October 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Willadsen E, Lohmander A, Persson C, Lundeborg I, Alaluusua S, Aukner R, et al. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 5. Speech outcomes in 5-year-olds - consonant production. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2017;51:37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janulewicz J, Costello BJ, Buckley MJ, et al. The effects of le Fort I osteotomies on velopharyngeal and speech functions in cleft patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:308–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotevall H, Lohmander A, Ejnell H, Bake B. Perceptual evaluation of speech and velopharyngeal function in children with and without cleft palate and the relationship to nasal airflow patterns. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002;39:409–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubker JF, Schweiger JW. Nasal airflow as an index of success of prosthetic management of cleft palate. J Dent Res 1969;48:368–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnell M, Van Demark D. Longitudinal speech performance in patients with cleft palate: comparisons based on secondary management. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:278–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohmander A, Willadsen E, Persson C, et al. Methodology for speech assessment in the Scand cleft project: an international randomized clinical trial on palatal surgery: experiences from a pilot study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009;46:347–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautio J, Åbyholm F, Vindenes H, et al. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 2. Surgical results. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2017;51:13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding-Kushner KL, Argamaso RV, Cotton RV, et al. Standardization for the reporting of nasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy: a report from an International Working Group. Cleft Palate J 1990;27:337–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wermker K, Lünenbürger H, Joos U, et al. Results of speech improvement following simultaneous push-back together with velopharyngeal flap surgery in cleft palate patients. J Cranio-Maxillo-Fac Surg 2014;42:525–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell D, Mildinhall S, Albery L, et al. The cleft care UK study. Part 4: perceptual speech outcomes. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015;18:36–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn T, Lohmander A. A longitudinal study of hearing and middle ear status in individuals with UCLP. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:989–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell D. Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2005;40:103–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira V, Sell D, Tuomainen J. The impact of maxillary osteotomy on speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate: an evidence-based approach to evaluating the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2013;50:25–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsson GE, Isberg AM. Velopharyngeal movement patterns in patients alternating between oral and glottal articulation: a clinical and cineradiographical study. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunnegård K, Lohmander A, van Doorn J. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2012;47:556–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar