Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Duncan DI. Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J. 2001;21:81–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:232–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan Ellis H, Asaolu O, Nebo V, Kasem A. Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen J, Carey J, Wong A. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant-based breast reconstruction: evaluating the evidence. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2011;64:1553–1561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, Menon NG. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesth Plast Surg. 2008;32:418–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:403e–410e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:250–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stump A, Holton LH, III, Connor J, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1162–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Blacam C, Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, et al. Cost analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:516–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallberg H, Lewin R, Rafnsdottir S, et al. Acellular dermal matrix support for breast reconstruction after mastectomy [Acellulär dermal matrix för bröstrekonstruktion efter mastektomi]. Gothenburg: Västra Götalandsregionen: Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Centre for Health Technology Assessment; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assessment of Methods in Health Care. Stockholm: Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE working group. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber MD, Williams L, Anderson ED, et al. Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CN, Hultman CS, Sepucha K. Do patients and providers agree about the most important facts and goals for breast reconstruction decisions? Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:563–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1606–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldelli I, Cardoni G, Franchelli S, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using a polyester mesh (Surgimesh-PET): a retrospective single-center study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:931e–939e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke-Pearson EM, Lin AM, Hertl C, et al. Revisions in implant-based breast reconstruction: how does direct-to-implant measure up? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1690–1699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collis GN, TerKonda SP, Waldorf JC, Perdikis G. Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits? Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:425–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, et al. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1170–1178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila AA, Seth AK, Wang E, et al. Human acellular dermis versus submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of short-term complications. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40:19–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Endress R, Choi MS, Lee GK. Use of fetal bovine acellular dermal xenograft with tissue expansion for staged breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:338–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg CG, Kelly DA, Wood BC, et al. Aesthetic outcomes of acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:S116–S120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey JD, Alperovich M, Weichman KE, et al. Breast reconstruction using contour fenestrated alloderm: does improvement in design translate to improved outcomes? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3:e505.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganske I, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Minimizing complications with the use of acellular dermal matrix for immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71:464–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim AM, Koolen PG, Ganor O, et al. Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction? Aesth Plast Surg. 2015;39:359–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israeli Ben-Noon H, Farber N, Weissman O, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix on drain secretions after immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47:308–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilchenmann AJ, Lardi AM, Ho-Asjoe M, et al. An evaluation of resource utilisation of single stage porcine acellular dermal matrix assisted breast reconstruction: a comparative study. Breast. 2014;23:876–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, et al. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1755–1762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu DZ, Mathes DW, Neligan PC, et al. Comparison of outcomes using AlloDerm versus FlexHD for implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:503–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer Ganz O, Tobalem M, Perneger T, et al. Risks and benefits of using an absorbable mesh in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:498e–507e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen KT, Mioton LM, Smetona JT, Seth AK, Kim JY. Esthetic outcomes of ADM-assisted expander-implant breast reconstruction. Eplasty. 2012;12:e58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nguyen MD, Chen C, Colakoglu S, Morris DJ, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Infectious complications leading to explanation in implant-based breast reconstruction with AlloDerm. Eplasty. 2010;10:e48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parks JW, Hammond SE, Walsh WA, et al. Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:739–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, et al. The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:901e–908e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter S, Chambers A, Govindajulu S, et al. Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa(R)): a comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:113–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preminger BA, McCarthy CM, Hu QY, et al. The influence of AlloDerm on expander dynamics and complications in the setting of immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a matched-cohort study. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:510–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1735–1740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbitany H, Wang F, Peled AW, et al. Tissue expander reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: defining the effects of coverage technique on nipple/areola preservation. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth AK, Hirsch EM, Fine NA, Kim JY. Utility of acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:750–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winocour S, Martinez-Jorge J, Habermann E, et al. Early surgical site infection following tissue expander breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: national benchmarking using national surgical quality improvement program. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42:194–200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butterfield JL. 440 consecutive immediate, implant-based, single-surgeon breast reconstructions in 281 patients: a comparison of early outcomes and costs between SurgiMend fetal bovine and AlloDerm human cadaveric acellular dermal matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:940–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmans RE, El Morabit F, Ottenhof MJ, et al. Single-stage breast reconstruction using Strattice: a retrospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieterich M, Paepke S, Zwiefel K, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:8e–19e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichler C, Vogt N, Brunnert K, et al. A head-to-head comparison between SurgiMend and epiflex in 127 breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3:e439.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gunnarsson GL, Borsen-Koch M, Arffmann S, et al. Successful breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix can be recommended in healthy non-smoking patients. Dan Med J. 2013;60:A4751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna KR, Tilt A, Holland M, et al. Reducing infectious complications in implant based breast reconstruction: impact of early expansion and prolonged drain use. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(Suppl 4):S312–S315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headon H, Kasem A, Manson A, et al. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: a prospective observational study in a single centre. Surg Oncol. 2016;25:104–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hille-Betz U, Kniebusch N, Wojcinski S, et al. Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1146–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsicker LM, Ashikari AY, Berry C, et al. Short-term complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78:35–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lardi AM, Ho-Asjoe M, Mohanna PN, Farhadi J. Immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: factors affecting outcome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:1098–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell RE. Porcine acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction: influence of adjuvant radiotherapy on complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2013;1:e77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mofid MM, Meininger MS, Lacey MS. Veritas(R) bovine pericardium for immediate breast reconstruction: a xenograft alternative to acellular dermal matrix products. Eur J Plast Surg. 2012;35:717–722.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohkuma R, Buretta KJ, Mohan R, et al. Initial experience with the use of foetal/neonatal bovine acellular dermal collagen matrix (SurgiMend) for tissue-expander breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:1195–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaia DA, Arthur KS, Cahan AC, Rosenberg MH. Incidence of seromas and infections using fenestrated versus nonfenestrated acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3:e569.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rawlani V, Buck DW, 2nd, Johnson SA, et al. Tissue expander breast reconstruction using prehydrated human acellular dermis. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66:593–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundell VL, Beck RT, Wang CE, et al. Complication prevalence following use of tutoplast-derived human acellular dermal matrix in prosthetic breast reconstruction: a retrospective review of 203 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:1345–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:514–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzberg CA, Dunavant C, Nocera N. Immediate breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice): long-term outcomes and complications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:323–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Berry C, Hunsicker LM. Acellular dermal matrix-assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction and capsular contracture: a 13-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:329–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth AK, Persing S, Connor CM, et al. A comparative analysis of cryopreserved versus prehydrated human acellular dermal matrices in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:632–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear SL, Seruya M, Rao SS, et al. Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction using AlloDerm including outcomes of different timings of radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessler O, Reish RG, Maman DY, et al. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:90e–99e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar