Complications, risk factors, and patients-reported outcomes after skin-sparing mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction in women with BRCA mutations

References

• Economopoulou P, Dimitriadis G, Psyrri A. Beyond BRCA: new hereditary breast cancer susceptibility genes. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindedal EM, Heramb C, Karsrud I, et al. Current guidelines for BRCA testing of breast cancer patients are insufficient to detect all mutation carriers. BMC Cancer 2017;17:438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann LC, Lindor NM. Risk-reducing surgery in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schrauder MG, Brunel-Geuder L, Haberle L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of risk-reducing surgeries in preventing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Breast. 2017;32:186–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Professional Guidelines. In: Health TNDo, editor. Oslo 4.10.2017; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy CM, Hamill JB, Kim HM, et al. Impact of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction on health-related quality of life in women at high risk for breast carcinoma: results of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2502–2508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sgarzani R, Negosanti L, Morselli PG, et al. Patient satisfaction and quality of life in DIEAP flap versus implant breast reconstruction. Surg Res Pract. 2015;2015:405163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dikmans RE, Negenborn VL, Bouman MB, et al. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:251–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfrerer L, Mattos D, Mastroianni M, et al. Assessment of patient factors, surgeons, and surgeon teams in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:245e–252e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razdan SN, Patel V, Jewell S, et al. Quality of life among patients after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:1409–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes F, Goncalves M, Pereira S, et al. Neuropathic pain after breast cancer treatment and its impact on sleep quality one year after cancer diagnosis. Breast 2017;33:125–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu G, Zeng Y, Xia Z, et al. Biorheological features of some soft tissues under a surgical tissue expansion procedure. Biorheology 1997;34:281–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey OT, Nugent NF, Burke SM, et al. Persistent pain after mastectomy with reconstruction. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23:482–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson JR, Tao A, Kirwan CC, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction does not increase postmastectomy pain. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:113–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonseth KA, Hokland BM, Tindholdt TT, et al. Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap or expandable breast implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1188–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J Jr., Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loge JH, Kaasa S. Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey: normative data from the general Norwegian population. Scand J Soc Med. 1998;26:250–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pusic AL, Cano S, Klassen AF. Breast-Q: Norwegian version of validated study-specific questionnaire for patients satisfaction after breast cancer surgery. Annual Scientific Meeting; 28 October; Oslo, Norway; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MI, Smith BH, Torrance N, et al. The S-LANSS score for identifying pain of predominantly neuropathic origin: validation for use in clinical and postal research. J Pain 2005;6:149–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giske L, Bautz-Holter E, Sandvik L, et al. Relationship between pain and neuropathic symptoms in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain Med. 2009;10:910–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley; 2000. p. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:555–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila AA, Mioton LM, Chow G, et al. Immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction compared with one-stage permanent implant breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of short-term complications. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47:344–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boughey JC, Hoskin TL, Hartmann LC, et al. Impact of reconstruction and reoperation on long-term patient-reported satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:401–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts A, Baxter N, Camacho X, et al. Once is rarely enough: a population-based study of reoperations after postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3302–3307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer JP, Fox JP, Nelson JA, et al. A longitudinal assessment of outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after immediate breast reconstruction-comparing implant- and autologous-based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2015;262:692–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Blacam C, Ogunleye AA, Momoh AO, et al. High body mass index and smoking predict morbidity in breast cancer surgery: a multivariate analysis of 26,988 patients from the national surgical quality improvement program database. Ann Surg. 2012;255:551–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, et al. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast. 2017;32:7–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Verschuer VM, Mureau MA, Gopie JP, et al. Patient satisfaction and Nipple-Areola sensitivity after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate implant breast reconstruction in a high breast cancer risk population: Nipple-Sparing mastectomy versus skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weichman KE, Hamill JB, Kim HM, et al. Understanding the recovery phase of breast reconstructions: Patient-reported outcomes correlated to the type and timing of reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68:1370–1378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Zhuang Y, Momeni A, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146:117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber KM, Zemina KL, Tugertimur B, et al. Outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy using tissue expander and implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(Suppl 4):S316–S319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover R, Padula WV, Van Vliet M, et al. Comparing five alternative methods of breast reconstruction surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:709e–723e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar