Improved patient-reported outcomes after autologous fat transplantation and corrective surgery after breast surgery

References

• Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Bjorklund T, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2005;14:201–208.
   Google Scholar
• Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:201e–209e.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland JH, Holland JC, Chaglassian T, et al. Psychological response to breast reconstruction. Expectations for and impact on postmastectomy functioning. Psychosomatics 1993;34:241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Barry M, Kell MR. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127:15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kling RE, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, et al. Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast. A National Survey of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:35–46.
   Google Scholar
• de Blacam C, Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, et al. Evaluation of clinical outcomes and aesthetic results after autologous fat grafting for contour deformities of the reconstructed breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:411e–418e.
   Google Scholar
• Kanchwala SK, Glatt BS, Conant EF, et al. Autologous fat grafting to the reconstructed breast: the management of acquired contour deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:409–418.
   Google Scholar
• Groen JW, Negenborn VL, Twisk DJ, et al. Autologous fat grafting in onco-plastic breast reconstruction: a systematic review on oncological and radiological safety, complications, volume retention and patient/surgeon satisfaction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:742–764.
   Google Scholar
• Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, et al. Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29:360–376.
   Google Scholar
• Lindegren A, Halle M, Docherty Skogh AC, et al. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the irradiated breast: a comparative study of DIEP and latissimus dorsi flap outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Beesley H, Ullmer H, Holcombe C, et al. How patients evaluate breast reconstruction after mastectomy, and why their evaluation often differs from that of their clinicians. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:1064–1071.
   Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Sbalchiero JC, Reece GP, et al. Assessment of breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:186e–194e.
   Google Scholar
• Wachter T, Edlinger M, Foerg C, et al. Differences between patients and medical professionals in the evaluation of aesthetic outcome following breast reconstruction with implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:1111–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2013;346:f167.
   Google Scholar
• Ishaque S, Karnon J, Chen G, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Qual Life Res. Epub 2018/10/05.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaaji A, Bruheim M. Quality of life after breast reconstruction: comparison of three methods. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2010;44:140–145.
   Google Scholar
• Largo RD, Tchang LA, Mele V, et al. Efficacy, safety and complications of autologous fat grafting to healthy breast tissue: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:437–448.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz I, Lindegren A, Wickman M. Improved shape and consistency after lipofilling of the breast: patients' evaluation of the outcome. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46:85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J. 1998;18:386–388.
   Google Scholar
• Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L. A prospective and randomized study, “SVEA,” comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:66–74. discussion 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Edsander-Nord A, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1142–1153. discussion 54–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gahm J, Jurell G, Edsander-Nord A, et al. Patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcome after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:332–338.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE. Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey–I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med (1982). 1995;41:1349–1358.
   Google Scholar
• Rigotti G, Marchi A, Gali M, et al. Clinical treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirate transplant: a healing process mediated by adipose-derived adult stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1409–1422. discussion 23–4.
   Google Scholar
• Agresti A. Kateri M. Categorical Data Analysis. In: Lovric M, editor. International encyclopedia of statistical science. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. p. 206–8.
   Google Scholar
• Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Pidgeon TE, et al. The need for core outcome reporting in autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:506–512.
   Google Scholar
• Agha RA, Pidgeon TE, Borrelli MR, et al. Validated outcomes in the grafting of autologous fat to the breast: the VOGUE study. Development of a core outcome set for research and audit. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:633e–638e.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl RA, Leedham SJ, Pacifico MD. The safety of autologous fat transfer in breast cancer: lessons from stem cell biology. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:283–288.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger M, Caviggioli F, Klinger FM, et al. Autologous fat graft in scar treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:1610–1615.
   Google Scholar
• Bonomi R, Betal D, Rapisarda IF, et al. Role of lipomodelling in improving aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing immediate and delayed reconstructive breast surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:1039–1045.
   Google Scholar
• Sinna R, Delay E, Garson S, et al. Breast fat grafting (lipomodelling) after extended latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction: a preliminary report of 200 consecutive cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1769–1777. Epub 2010/01/19.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Association of fat grafting with patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:944–950.
   Google Scholar
• Pelusi J. Sexuality and body image. Research on breast cancer survivors documents altered body image and sexuality. Am J Nurs. 2006;106:32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Costantino A, Fioramonti P, Ciotti M, et al. Lipofilling in skin affected by radiodermatitis: clinical and ultrasound aspects. Case report. G Chir. 2012;33:186–190.
   Google Scholar
• Garza RM, Paik KJ, Chung MT, et al. Studies in fat grafting: Part III. Fat grafting irradiated tissue–improved skin quality and decreased fat graft retention. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:249–257.
   Google Scholar
• Mojallal A, Lequeux C, Shipkov C, et al. Improvement of skin quality after fat grafting: clinical observation and an animal study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:765–774.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Griffin M, Adigbli G, et al. Lipotransfer for radiation-induced skin fibrosis. Br J Surg. 2016;103:950–961.
   Google Scholar
• Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D. The serial free fat transfer in irradiated prosthetic breast reconstructions. Aesth Plast Surg. 2009;33:695–700.
   Google Scholar