Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after delayed breast reconstruction using DIEP flap: a 10 years’ follow-up survey

References

• Norwegian Cancer Registry. [cited 2016 August 20]. Available from: https://www.kreftregisteret.no/Generelt/Fakta-om-kreft/Brystkreft-Alt2/
   Google Scholar
• Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1153–1160.
   Google Scholar
• Busic V, Das-Gupta R, Mesic H, et al. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction, the learning curve explored. J Plastic Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2006;59:580–584.
   Google Scholar
• Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K, et al. Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter comparison of four abdominally based autologous reconstruction methods. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:758–771.
   Google Scholar
• Tonseth KA, Hokland BM, Tindholdt TT, et al. Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap or expandable breast implant. J Plastic Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2008;61:1188–1194.
   Google Scholar
• Tonseth KA, Hokland BM, Tindholdt TT, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Scand J Plastic Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2007;41:173–177.
   Google Scholar
• McKean LN, Newman EF, Adair P. Feeling like me again: a grounded theory of the role of breast reconstruction surgery in self-image. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013;22:493–502.
   Google Scholar
• Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, et al. Which breast is the best? Successful autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction: patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Damen TH, Timman R, Kunst EH, et al. High satisfaction rates in women after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plastic Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2010;63:93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:769–776.
   Google Scholar
• Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg. 2008;247:1019–1028.
   Google Scholar
• Atisha DM, Rushing CN, Samsa GP, et al. A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:361–369.
   Google Scholar
• Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L. A prospective and randomized study, "SVEA," comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:66–74.
   Google Scholar
• Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Bjorklund T, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2005;14:201–208.
   Google Scholar
• Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:201e–209e.
   Google Scholar
• Dian D, Schwenn K, Mylonas I, et al. Quality of life among breast cancer patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction versus breast conserving therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007;133:247–252.
   Google Scholar
• Thorarinsson A, Frojd V, Kolby L, et al. Long-term health-related quality of life after breast reconstruction: comparing 4 different methods of reconstruction. Plastic Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2017;5:e1316.
   Google Scholar
• Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, et al. Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:940–947.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong T, McCarthy C, Min S, et al. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes. Cancer. 2012;118:1701–1709.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsinger V, Hivelin M, Derder M, et al. Long-term follow-up of quality of life following DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1361–1371.
   Google Scholar
• Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938–1943.
   Google Scholar
• Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT, et al. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plastic Surg. 2003;56:462–470.
   Google Scholar
• Lee C, Sunu C, Pignone M. Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a systematic review. J Am College Surg. 2009;209:123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, et al. Qualitative assessment of breast reconstruction in a specialist breast unit. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:445–453.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, et al. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Institute. 2000;92:1422–1429.
   Google Scholar
• Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1585–1595.
   Google Scholar
• Pahle AS KC. BREAST-Q: Norwegian version of validated study-specific questionnaire for patient satisfaction after breast surgery. Abstract no. 8. Annual scientific meeting, 28th October 2010 Abstract no. 8; Oslo, Norway. https://issuu.com/brataas/docs/vitenskapelige_forhandlinger_2010
   Google Scholar
• Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. A closer look at the BREAST-Q(c). Clin Plastic Surg. 2013;40:287–296.
   Google Scholar
• BREAST-Q. [cited 2016 August 10]. Available from: http://qportfolio.org/breastq/domains/
   Google Scholar
• Pusic AL, Matros E, Fine N, et al. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast reconstruction: results of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017140:7S–13S. Jco2016699561.
   Google Scholar
• Weichman KE, Broer PN, Thanik VD, et al. Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction in thin patients: a comparison between microsurgical and prosthetic implant recipients. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzer JA, Miller HC, Pusic AL, et al. Satisfaction following unilateral breast reconstruction: a comparison of pedicled TRAM and free abdominal flaps. Plastic Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2015;3:e482.
   Google Scholar
• Sugrue R, MacGregor G, Sugrue M, et al. An evaluation of patient reported outcomes following breast reconstruction utilizing Breast Q. Breast. 2013;22:158–161.
   Google Scholar
• Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:891–899. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677.
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk M, van Egdom LSE, Richel C, et al. Patient reported outcome measures in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:963–968.
   Google Scholar
• Fracon S, Renzi N, Manara M, et al. Patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction: implants vs. autologous tissues. Acta Chir Plast. 2018;59:120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Saulis AS, Mustoe TA, Fine NA. A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1669–1676.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhawat L, Busheri L, Dixit S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction surgery and therapeutic mammoplasty: prospective evaluation 1 year post-surgery with BREAST-Q questionnaire. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2015;6:356–362.
   Google Scholar
• Potter S, Mills N, Cawthorn S, et al. Exploring information provision in reconstructive breast surgery: a qualitative study. Breast. 2015;24:732–738.
   Google Scholar
• Lee CN, Deal AM, Huh R, et al. Quality of patient decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:741–748.
   Google Scholar
• Hersch J, Barratt A, Jansen J, et al. Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:1642–1652.
   Google Scholar
• Begum S, Grunfeld EA, Ho-Asjoe M, et al. An exploration of patient decision-making for autologous breast reconstructive surgery following a mastectomy. Patient Educ Counsel. 2011;84:105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Snell L, et al. Measuring and managing patient expectations for breast reconstruction: impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12:149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Nab Z, Grunfeld EA. Satisfaction with outcome and attitudes towards scarring among women undergoing breast reconstructive surgery. Patient Educ Counsel. 2007;66:243–249.
   Google Scholar
• Temple-Oberle C, Ayeni O, Webb C, et al. Shared decision-making: applying a person-centered approach to tailored breast reconstruction information provides high satisfaction across a variety of breast reconstruction options. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:796–800.
   Google Scholar
• Pockaj BA, Degnim AC, Boughey JC, et al. Quality of life after breast cancer surgery: what have we learned and where should we go next? J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:447–455.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009-2015. J Plastic Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2016;69:149–162.
   Google Scholar