Transferring the protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on skin flap among rats by blood serum

References

• Orhan E, Erol YR, Deren O, et al. Efficacy of liposuction as a delay method for improving flap survival. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016;40:931–937.
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer R, Lorenzen J, Kabbani M, et al. Acute effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on cutaneous microcirculation—a controlled prospective cohort study. BMC Surg. 2011;23:32.
   Google Scholar
• Keskin D, Unlu RE, Orhan E, et al. Effects of remote ischemic conditioning methods on ischemia-reperfusion injury in muscle flaps: an experimental study in rats. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44:384–389.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ascenzo F, Moretti C, Omedè P, et al. Cardiac remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces periprocedural myocardial infarction for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. EuroIntervention. 2014;9:1463–1471.
   Google Scholar
• Küntscher MV, Kastell T, Sauerbier M, et al. Acute remote ischemic preconditioning on a rat cremasteric muscle flap model. Microsurg. 2002;22:221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Küntscher MV, Kastell T, Engel H, et al. 2003.Late remote ischemic preconditioning in rat muscle and adipocutaneous flap models. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51:84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Tapuria N, Kumar Y, Habib MM, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning: a novel protective method from ischemia reperfusion injury a review. J Surg Res. 2008;150:304–330.
   Google Scholar
• Lim SY, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. The neural and humoral pathways in remote limb ischemic preconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010;105:651–655.
   Google Scholar
• Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Preconditioning and postconditioning: united at reperfusion. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;116:173–191.
   Google Scholar
• Breivik L, Helgeland E, Aarnes EK, et al. Remote postconditioning by humoral factors in effluent from ischemic preconditioned rat hearts is mediated via PI3K/Akt-dependent cell-survival signaling at reperfusion. Basic Res Cardiol. 2011;106:135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Randhawa PK, Jaggi AS. Unraveling the role of adenosine in remote ischemic preconditioning-induced cardioprotection. Life Sci. 2016;155:140–146.
   Google Scholar
• Randhawa PK, Bali A, Jaggi AS. RIPC for multiorgan salvage in clinical settings: evolution of concept, evidences and mechanisms. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;746:317–332.
   Google Scholar
• Franco-Gou R, Rosello-Catafau J, Casillas-Ramirez A, et al. How ischaemic preconditioning protects small liver grafts. J Pathol. 2006;208:62–73.
   Google Scholar
• Li G, Labruto F, Sirsjö A, et al. Myocardial protection by remote preconditioning: the role of nuclear factor kappa-B p105 and inducible nitric oxide synthase. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26:968–973.
   Google Scholar
• Bolli R. Preconditioning: a paradigm shift in the biology of myocardial ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292:H19–H27.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson EW, Reinhardt CP, Renzi FP, et al. Ischemic preconditioning may be transferable via whole blood transfusion: preliminary evidence. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1999;8:123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Giricz Z, Varga ZV, Baranyai T, et al. Cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning of the rat heart is mediated by extracellular vesicles. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;68:75–78.
   Google Scholar
• Waza AA, Hamid Z, Ali S, et al. A review on heme oxygenase-1 induction: is it a necessary evil. Inflamm Res. 2018;67:579–588.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering AM, Linder RA, Zhang H, et al. Nrf2-dependent induction of proteasome and Pa28αβ regulator are required for adaptation to oxidative stress. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:10021–10031.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Amara M, Yang SY, Quaglia A, et al. Role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in remote ischemic preconditioning of the mouse liver. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:610–619.
   Google Scholar
• Pekow CA, Baumans V. Common Nonsurgical Tecniques and Procedures. Chapter 15. In: Hau J and van Hoosier, Jr GL, editors. Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science Second Edition. Vol. I. New York(NY): CRC Press; 2003. p. 347–389.
   Google Scholar
• Masaoka K, Asato H, Umekawa K, et al. Value of remote ischaemic preconditioning in rat dorsal skin flaps and clamping time. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50:107–110.
   Google Scholar
• Topcu-Tarladacalisir Y, Akpolat M, Uz YH, et al. Effects of curcumin on apoptosis and oxidoinflammatory regulation in a rat model of acetic acid-induced colitis: the roles of c-Jun N-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Med Food. 2013;16:296–305.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan C, Melikoglu C, Ocal I, et al. Effect of epigallocatechin gallate on ischemia-reperfusion injury: an experimental study in a rat epigastric island flap. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;15:57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Tähepõld P, Vaage J, Starkopf J, et al. Hyperoxia elicits myocardial protection through a nuclear factor kappaB-dependent mechanism in the rat heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:650–660.
   Google Scholar
• Jones WK, Flaherty MP, Tang XL, et al. Ischemic preconditioning increases iNOS transcript levels in conscious rabbits via a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31:1469–1481.
   Google Scholar
• Chen G, Thakkar M, Robinson C, et al. Limb remote ischemic conditioning: mechanisms, anesthetics, and the potential for expanding therapeutic options. Front Neurol. 2018;9:40.
   Google Scholar
• Wakabayashi N, Slocum SL, Skoko JJ, et al. When NRF2 talks, who's listening? Antioxid Redox Signal. 2010;13:1649–1663.
   Google Scholar
• Tohidnezhad M, Wruck CJ, Slowik A, et al. Role of platelet-released growth factors in detoxification of reactive oxygen species in osteoblasts. Bone. 2014;65:9–17.
   Google Scholar