Should immediate breast reconstruction be performed in the setting of radiotherapy? An ethical analysis

References

• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and management [Internet]. NICE guideline [NG101]. London, United Kingdom; 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng101
   Google Scholar
• Regional Cancer Centre Stockholm-Gotland. Bröstcancer [Internet]. Nationellt vårdprogram. Stockholm, Sweden; 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.cancercentrum.se/samverkan/cancerdiagnoser/brost/vardprogram/
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Nationella riktlinjer för bröst-, prostata-, tjocktarms- och ändtarmscancer [Internet]. Stöd för styrning och ledning. Stockholm, Sweden; 2014 [cited 2019 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/SiteCollectionDocuments/nr-cancer-vetenskapligt-underlag-brostcancer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labour. The Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act (WHCRA) [Internet]. Whashington DC, USA; 1998 [cited 2019 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.dol.gov/sites/default/files/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/publications/cagwhcra.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The New York State Senate. The New York State (NYS) Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law [Internet]. Bill S.6993-B. New York, USA; 2010 [cited 2019 Apr 10]. Available from: https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2009/S6993B
   Google Scholar
• The European Parliament. European Parliament resolution on breast cancer in the European Union (2002/2279(INI)) Internet. Brussels, Belgium; 2002 [cited 2019 Apr 10]. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P5-TA-2003-0270+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
   Google Scholar
• Biganzoli L, Marotti L, Hart CD, et al. Quality indicators in breast cancer care: an update from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2017;86:59–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, Anveden L, Celebioglu F, et al. Radiotherapy in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: risk factors, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures in a large Swedish multicenter cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142(3):591–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney AM, Brown MS, Soltanian HT. Timing of radiation and outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(12):1719–1726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallet AV, Salem N, Moutardier V, et al. Radiotherapy and immediate two-stage breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and implant: complications and esthetic results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(1):136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear SL, Seruya M, Rao SS, et al. Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction using AlloDerm including outcomes of different timings of radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, et al. What is the optimum timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in two-Stage prosthetic teconstruction: radiation to the tissue expander or permanent implant?. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1509–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagsi R, Momoh AO, Qi J, et al. Impact of radiotherapy on complications and patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(2):157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels N. Reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. J Philosophy. 1979;76(5):256–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5 ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim AM, Sinno HH, Lzadpanah A, et al. Mastopexy for breast ptosis: utility outcomes of population preferences. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2015;23(2):103–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker PA, Youssef A, Walker S, et al. Short-term and long-term psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in women undergoing different surgical procedures for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol.. 2007;14(11):3078–3089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, et al. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(3):1060–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budden LM, Hayes BA, Buettner PG. Women's decision satisfaction and psychological distress following early breast cancer treatment: a treatment decision support role for nurses. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20(1):8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorde A. The cancer journals. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Slatman J. The meaning of body experience evaluation in oncology. Health Care Anal. 2011;19(4):295–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan J, Sherman KA, Lam T, et al. Regret associated with the decision for breast reconstruction: the association of negative body image, distress and surgery characteristics with decision regret. Psychol Health. 2008;23(2):207–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho AL, Klassen AF, Cano S, et al. Optimizing patient-centered care in breast reconstruction: the importance of preoperative information and patient-physician communication. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):212e–220e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status-quo bias. J Econ Perspect. 1991;5(1):193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):395–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santana MJ, Manalili K, Jolley RJ, et al. How to practice person-centred care: a conceptual framework. Health Expect. 2018;21(2):429–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandman L, Munthe C. Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal. 2010;18(1):60–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd AJ. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(Supplement 1):i14–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avis NE, Smith KW, McKinlay JB. Accuracy of perceptions of heart attack risk: what influences perceptions and can they be changed?. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(12):1608–1612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein ND. Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science. 1989;246(4935):1232–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH, et al. Misunderstanding in cancer patients: why shoot the messenger?. Ann Oncol. 1999;10(1):39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CS, Cox CE, Reintgen DS, et al. Influence of physician communication on newly diagnosed breast patients' psychologic adjustment and decision-making. Cancer. 1994;74(S1):336–341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arora NK. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(5):791–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wancata LM, Hinshaw DB. Rethinking autonomy: decision making between patient and surgeon in advanced illnesses. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(4):77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish Government. Prioriteringar inom hälso- och sjukvården [Internet]. Government Bill 1996/97:60. Stockholm, Sweden; 1996 [cited 2019 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/proposition/prioriteringar-inom-halso–och-sjukvarden_GK0360
   Google Scholar
• Norweigan Minstry of Health and Care Service. Åpent og rettferdig – prioriteringer i helsetjenesten [Internet]. Norges offentlige utredninger – NOU 2014:12. Oslo, Norway; 2014 [cited 2019 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/NOU-2014-12/id2076730/
   Google Scholar
• van de Wetering EJ, Stolk EA, van Exel NJ, et al. Balancing equity and efficiency in the Dutch basic benefits package using the principle of proportional shortfall. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe C, Claxton K, Culyer AJ. The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(9):733–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson M, Nilsson FO, Arnberg K. Reimbursement decisions for pharmaceuticals in Sweden: the impact of disease severity and cost effectiveness. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(11):1229–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razdan SN, Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast reconstruction options in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):510e–517e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar