Breast Reconstruction for Medicaid Beneficiaries: A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence

References

• Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg. 2008;247(6):1019–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, et al. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(3):1060–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(5):1014–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siotos C, Hassanein AH, Bello RJ, et al. Delayed breast reconstruction on patients with upper extremity lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature and pooled analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;81(6):730–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siotos C, Sebai ME, Wan EL, et al. Breast reconstruction and risk of arm lymphedema development: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(6):807–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg MD, Juliano MA, Wise L. Psychological outcome of lumpectomy versus mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142(1):34–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart AM, Pinell-White X, Losken A. The psychosexual impact of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77(5):517–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siotos C, Naska A, Bello RJ, et al. Survival and disease recurrence rates among breast cancer patients following mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(2):169e–177e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RL, Newman AS, Lin IC, et al. Trends in immediate breast reconstruction across insurance groups after enactment of breast cancer legislation. Cancer. 2013;119(13):2462–2468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Janz NK, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction: results from a population- based study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(32):5325–5330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, et al. An analysis of immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction frequency using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Breast J. 2011;17(4):352–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruper L, Holt A, Xu XX, et al. Disparities in reconstruction rates after mastectomy: patterns of care and factors associated with the use of breast reconstruction in Southern California. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(8):2158–2165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre TCC, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28(2):105–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons. 2019. Available from http://handbook.cochrane.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard TNS, Zhong L, Momoh AO, et al. Improved rates of immediate breast reconstruction at safety net hospitals. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn N, Fulton J, Pearlman DN, et al. Treatment variation by insurance status for breast cancer patients. Breast J. 2008;14(2):128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi E, Giladi AM, Wu L, et al. Effect of federal and state policy changes on racial/ethnic variation in immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(5):1285–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roughton MC, DiEgidio P, Zhou L, et al. Distance to a plastic surgeon and type of insurance plan are independently predictive of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(2):203e–211e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisco M, Du H, Warner JP, et al. Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(5):658–667.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sommers AS, Paradise J, Miller C. Physician willingness and resources to serve more Medicaid patients: perspectives from primary care physicians. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2011;1(2):1–1.
   Google Scholar
• Long SK. Physicians may need more than higher reimbursement to expand Medicaid participation: findings from Washington State. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(9):1560–1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukus ER, Casil A, O’Malley AS. A snapshot of US physicians: key findings from the 2008 health tracking physician survey. Washington (DC): Center for Studying Health System Change; 2009. (Data Bulletin No. 35).
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham PJ, May JH. Medicaid patients increasingly concentrated among physicians. Washington (DC): Center for Studying Health System Change; 2006. (Tracking Report No. 16).
   Google Scholar
• Morrow M, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, et al. Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. Cancer. 2005;104(11):2340–2346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Morrow M, et al. Receipt of delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy: do women revisit the decision? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(6):1748–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow M, Li Y, Alderman AK, et al. Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(10):1015–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Sclafani L, et al. Breast cancer recurrence following prosthetic, postmastectomy reconstruction: incidence, detection, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(2):381–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezuhly M, Temple C, Sigurdson LJ, et al. Immediate postmastectomy reconstruction is associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival: evidence and new challenges from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer. 2009;115(20):4648–4654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen C, Frisell J, Wickman M, et al. Immediate reconstruction with implants in women with invasive breast cancer does not affect oncological safety in a matched cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127(2):439–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy S, Colakoglu S, Curtis MS, et al. Breast cancer recurrence following postmastectomy reconstruction compared to mastectomy with no reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66(5):466–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Hlubocky FJ, et al. The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer. Cancer. 2014;120(20):3245–3253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Wroblewski K, et al. Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: the validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST). Cancer. 2017;123(3):476–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker-Seeley RD, Yabroff RK. Minimizing the “Financial Toxicity” associated with cancer care: advancing the research agenda. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(5):djv40.
   Google Scholar
• Casilla-Lennon MM, Choi SK, Deal AM, et al. Financial toxicity among patients with bladder cancer: reasons for delay in care and effect on quality of life. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1166–1173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abott DE, Voils CL, Fisher DA, et al. Socioeconomic disparities, financial toxicity, and opportunities for enhanced system efficiencies for patients with cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(3):250–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagsi R, Pottow JAE, Griffith KA, et al. Long-term financial burden of breast cancer: experiences of a diverse cohort of survivors identified through population-based registries. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(12):1269–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, et al. The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient’s experience. Oncologist. 2013;18(4):381–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker SL. In 2011 nearly one-third of physicians said they would not accept new Medicaid patients, but rising fees may help. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(8):1673–1679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics. Ambulatory health care data: survey results and products. 2011. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/ahcd_products.htm [accessed 2018 August 1]
   Google Scholar
• Paradise J, Kaiser Family Foundation. Data note: medicaid managed care growth and implications of the medicaid expansion. 2017. Available: https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/data-note-medicaid-managed-care-growth-and-implications-of-the-medicaid-expansion/ [accessed 2018 August 1]
   Google Scholar
• Garfield R, Hinton E, Cornachione E, et al. Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicaid managed care plans and access to care: results from the Kaiser Family Foundation 2017 survey of medicaid managed care plans. 2018. Available: https://www.kff.org/report-section/medicaid-managed-care-plans-and-access-to-care-provider-networks-and-access-to-care/ [accessed 2018 August 1]
   Google Scholar
• Wiznia DH, Nwachukwu E, Roth A, et al. The influence of medical insurance on patient access to orthopedic surgery sports medicine appointments under the Affordable Care Act. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(7).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack CE, Ross ME, Armstrong K, et al. Using a mystery-caller approach to examine access to prostate cancer care in Philadelphia. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draeger RW, Patterson BM, Olsson EC, et al. The influence of patient insurance status on access to outpatient orthopedic care for flexor tendon lacerations. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(3):527–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar