2,614
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparison of inflammatory response and synovial metaplasia in immediate breast reconstruction with a synthetic and a biological mesh: a randomized controlled clinical trial

, &
Pages 131-136 | Received 08 Aug 2019, Accepted 02 Dec 2019, Published online: 20 Dec 2019

References

  • Duncan DI. Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthetic Surg J. 2001;21(1):81–84.
  • JoAnna Nguyen T, Carey JN, Wong AK. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: evaluating the evidence. J Plastic Reconstruct Aesthetic Surg. 2011;64(12):1553–1561.
  • Logan Ellis H, Asaolu O, Nebo V, et al. Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review. World J Surg Onc. 2016;14(1):121.
  • Boháč M, Danišovič Ľ, Danihel Ľ, et al. Histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of capsular synovial metaplasias that form around silicone breast implants. Biologia. 2018;73(1):107–112.
  • Capito AE, Tholpady SS, Agrawal H, et al. Evaluation of host tissue integration, revascularization, and cellular infiltration within various dermal substrates. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(5):495–500.
  • Dieterich M, Stubert J, Gerber B, et al. Biocompatibility, cell growth and clinical relevance of synthetic meshes and biological matrixes for internal support in implant-based breast reconstruction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(6):1371–1379.
  • Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K. Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(5):532–543.
  • Siggelkow W, Faridi A, Spiritus K, et al. Histological analysis of silicone breast implant capsules and correlation with capsular contracture. Biomaterials. 2003;24(6):1101–1109.
  • Poeppl N, Schreml S, Lichtenegger F, et al. Does the surface structure of implants have an impact on the formation of a capsular contracture? Aesth Plast Surg. 2007;31(2):133–139.
  • Stump A, Holton LH, 3rd, Connor J, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2009;124(1):82–91.
  • Leong M, Basu CB, Hicks MJ. Further evidence that human acellular dermal matrix decreases inflammatory markers of capsule formation in implant-based breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Surg J. 2015;35(1):40–47.
  • Yu D, Hanna KR, LeGallo RD, et al. Comparison of histological characteristics of acellular dermal matrix capsules to surrounding breast capsules in acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(5):485–488.
  • Basu CB, Jeffers L. The role of acellular dermal matrices in capsular contracture: a review of the evidence. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2012;130(5 Suppl 2):118S–124S.
  • Hille-Betz U, Kniebusch N, Wojcinski S, et al. Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(4):1146–1152.
  • Wong AK, Schönmeyer BH, Singh P, et al. Histologic analysis of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in acellular human dermis. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2008;121(4):1144–1152. Epub 2008/03/20.
  • Ko CY, Ahn CY, Ko J, et al. Capsular synovial metaplasia as a common response to both textured and smooth implants. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 1996;97(7):1427–1433.
  • Bassetto F, Scarpa C, Caccialanza E, et al. Histological features of periprosthetic mammary capsules: silicone vs. polyurethane. Aesth Plast Surg. 2010;34(4):481–485.
  • Basu CB, Leong M, Hicks MJ. Acellular cadaveric dermis decreases the inflammatory response in capsule formation in reconstructive breast surgery. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2010;126(6):1842–1847.
  • Hallberg H, Lewin R, Bhatti Söfteland M, et al. Complications, long-term outcome and quality of life following Surgisis and muscle covered implants in immediate breast reconstruction: a case-control study with a six year follow-up. Eur J Plast Surg. 2018;42:33.
  • Hallberg H, Lewin R, Elander A, et al. TIGR((R)) matrix surgical mesh – a two-year follow-up study and complication analysis in 65 immediate breast reconstructions. J Plastic Surg Hand Surg. 2018;52(4):253–258.
  • Luo X, Kulig KM, Finkelstein EB, Nicholson MF, et al. In vitro evaluation of decellularized ECM-derived surgical scaffold biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 2017;105(3):585–593.
  • Mofid MM, Meininger MS, Lacey MS. Veritas(R) bovine pericardium for immediate breast reconstruction: a xenograft alternative to acellular dermal matrix products. Eur J Plast Surg. 2012;35(10):717–722.
  • Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP. Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(10):1275–1285.
  • Hjort H, Mathisen T, Alves A, et al. Three-year results from a preclinical implantation study of a long-term resorbable surgical mesh with time-dependent mechanical characteristics. Hernia. 2012;16(2):191–197.
  • Spear SL, Baker JL Jr. Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 1995;96(5):1119–1123.
  • Cheng CW, Solorio LD, Alsberg E. Decellularized tissue and cell-derived extracellular matrices as scaffolds for orthopaedic tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32(2):462–484.
  • Hallberg H, Elander A, Kölby L, et al. A biological or a synthetic mesh in immediate breast reconstruction? A cohort-study of long-term Health related Quality of Life (HrQoL). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(10):1812–1816.
  • Komorowska-Timek E, Oberg KC, Timek TA, et al. The effect of AlloDerm envelopes on periprosthetic capsule formation with and without radiation. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2009;123(3):807–816.
  • Silva EN, Ribas-Filho JM, Czeczko NG, et al. Histological evaluation of capsules formed by silicon implants coated with polyurethane foam and with a textured surface in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2016;31(12):774–782.
  • Duxbury PJ, Harvey JR. Systematic review of the effectiveness of polyurethane-coated compared with textured silicone implants in breast surgery. J Plastic Reconstruct Aesthetic Surg. 2016;69(4):452–460.
  • Hwang K, Sim HB, Huan F, et al. Myofibroblasts and capsular tissue tension in breast capsular contracture. Aesth Plast Surg. 2010;34(6):716–721.
  • Rudolph R, Abraham J, Vecchione T, et al. Myofibroblasts and free silicon around breast implants. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 1978;62(2):185–196.
  • Baker JL, Jr., Chandler ML, LeVier RR. Occurrence and activity of myofibroblasts in human capsular tissue surrounding mammary implants. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 1981;68(6):905–912.
  • Bui JM, Perry T, Ren CD, et al. Histological characterization of human breast implant capsules. Aesth Plast Surg. 2015;39(3):306–315.
  • Kuriyama E, Ochiai H, Inoue Y, et al. Characterization of the capsule surrounding smooth and textured tissue expanders and correlation with contracture. Plastic Reconstruct Surg Global Open. 2017;5(7):e1403.
  • Silva EN, Ribas-Filho JM, Tabushi FI, et al. Smooth muscle alpha actin immunoexpression (alpha-Sma) and CD-117 antibody (C-Kit) in capsules formed by polyurethane foam-coated silicone implants and with textured surface: a study on rats. Aesth Plast Surg. 2019;43(1):233–242.
  • Prantl L, Schreml S, Fichtner-Feigl S, et al. Clinical and morphological conditions in capsular contracture formed around silicone breast implants. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2007;120(1):275–284.
  • Kamel M, Protzner K, Fornasier V, et al. The peri-implant breast capsule: an immunophenotypic study of capsules taken at explantation surgery. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58(1):88–96.