Correction of malrotation in two-stage breast reconstruction: outcomes and risk-factor analysis

References

• Brown MH , Shenker R , Silver SA. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(3):768–779.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nahabedian MY. Shaped versus round implants for breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2(3):e116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caplin DA. Indications for the use of memory shape breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: long-term clinical outcomes of shaped versus round silicone breast implants. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3S):27S–37S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macadam SA , Ho AL , Lennox PA , et al. Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: a comparison of shaped cohesive gel and round cohesive gel implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(3):431–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khavanin N , Clemens MW , Pusic AL , et al. Shaped versus round implants in breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of surgical and patient-reported outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1063–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schots JM , Fechner MR , Hoogbergen MM , et al. Malrotation of the McGhan Style 510 prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(1):261–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montemurro P , Papas A , Hedén P. Is rotation a concern with anatomical breast implants? A statistical analysis of factors predisposing to rotation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(6):1367–1378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeke JL , Hidalgo DA. Breast deformity caused by anatomical or teardrop implant rotation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2555–2567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lista F , Tutino R , Khan A , et al. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):295–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N , Picha GJ , Murphy DK. Natrelle silicone breast implant follow-up study: demographics, lifestyle, and surgical characteristics of more than 50,000 augmentation subjects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(1):70–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond DC , Migliori MM , Caplin DA , et al. Mentor contour profile gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(6):1381–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell GP , Scheflan M , Spear S , et al. Benefits and limitations of macrotextured breast implants and consensus recommendations for optimizing their effectiveness. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(6):876–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panettiere P , Marchetti L , Accorsi D. Rotation of anatomic prostheses: a possible cause of breast deformity. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004;28(5):348–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire P , Reisman NR , Murphy DK. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture, malposition, and late seroma in subjects receiving Natrelle 410 form-stable silicone breast implants. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber DA , Stark RY , Chase S , et al. Clinical evaluation of shaped gel breast implant rotation using high-resolution ultrasound. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(3):290–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedén P , Montemurro P , Adams Jr WP , et al. Anatomical and round breast implants: how to select and indications for use. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(2):263–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárdenas-Camarena L , Encinas-Brambila J. Round gel breast implants or anatomic gel breast implants: which is the best choice? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(5):743–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebbetts JB. Warning about a warning about anatomical breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(7):1912–1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danino A , Rocher F , Blanchet-Bardon C , et al. editors. A scanning electron microscopy study of the surface of porous-textured breast implants and their capsules. Description of the “Velcro” effect of porous-textured breast prostheses. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Brink RR. Sequestered fluid and breast implant malposition. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(4):679–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens WG , Nahabedian MY , Calobrace MB , et al. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 5-year Sientra study analysis using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):1115–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell AS , Tessler O , Lin AM , et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(3):496–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar