References
- ASPS statistics. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2018/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2018.pdf.
- Hidalgo DA, Weinstein AL. Intraoperative comparison of anatomical versus round implants in breast augmentation: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(3):587–596.
- Khavanin N, Clemens MW, Pusic AL, et al. Shaped versus round implants in breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of surgical and patient-reported outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1063–1070.
- Heidekrueger PI, Sinno S, Hidalgo DA, et al. Current trends in breast augmentation: an international analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(2):133–148.
- Hedén P, Montemurro P, Adams WP, Jr, et al. Anatomical and round breast implants: how to select and indications for use. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(2):263–272.
- Calobrace MB, Schwartz MR, Zeidler KR, et al. Long-term safety of textured and smooth breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;38(1):38–48.
- Cole NM. Consequences of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Directed Moratorium on Silicone Gel Breast Implants: 1992 to 2006. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(5):1137–1141.
- Mallucci PL. 10-Year experience using inspira implants: a review with personal anecdote. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):37S–42S.
- Montemurro P, Cheema M, Hedén P, et al. Do not fear an implant's shape: a single surgeon's experience of over 1200 round and shaped textured implants in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(3):254–261.
- Caplin DA. Indications for the use of memoryshape breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: long-term clinical outcomes of shaped versus round silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:27S–37S.
- Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, et al. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet Surg J. 2015; 35(2):145–155.
- Spear SL, Murphy DK, Allergan Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Core Clinical Study Group. Natrelle round silicone breast implants: core study results at 10 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):1354–1361.
- ANSM public consultation. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from: https://ansm.sante.fr/S-informer/Points-d-information-Points-d-information/Consultation-publique-sur-la-place-et-l-utilisation-des-implants-mammaires-textures-en-chirurgie-esthetique-et-reconstructrice-Point-d-Information.
- FDA safety communication. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/fda-requests-allergan-voluntarily-recall-natrelle-biocell-textured-breast-implants-and-tissue.
- TGA. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from: https://www.tga.gov.au/alert/update-safety-and-performance-concerns-suspended-breast-implants.
- Montemurro P, Agko M, Quattrini Li A, et al. Implementation of an integrated biodimensional method of breast augmentation with anatomic, highly cohesive silicone gel implants: short-term results with the first 620 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(7):782–792.
- ISO International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14607: 2018. —Non-active surgical implants—Mammary implants—Particular requirements. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/63973.html.
- Atlan M, Bigerelle M, Larreta-Garde V, et al. Characterization of breast implant surfaces, shapes, and biomechanics: a comparison of high cohesive anatomically shaped textured silicone, breast implants from three different manufacturers. Aesth Plast Surg. 2016;40(1):89–97.
- Kyle DJT, Oikonomou A, Hill EW, et al. Development and functional evaluation of biomimetic silicone surfaces with hierarchical micro/nano-topographical features demonstrates favourable in vitro foreign body response of breast-derived fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 2015;52:88–102.
- Danino AM, Basmacioglu P, Saito S, et al. Comparison of the capsular response to the Biocell RTV and Mentor 1600 Siltex breast implant surface texturing: a scanning electron microscopic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(7):2047–2052.
- Barr SP, Hill EW, Bayat A. Functional biocompatibility testing of silicone breast implants and a novel classification system based on surface roughness. J Mech Behavior of Biomed Materials. 2017;75:75–81.
- Jones P, Mempin M, Hu H, et al. The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):837–849.
- Brown T. Surface areas of textured breast implants: implications for the biofilm theory of capsule formation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(3):e1700.
- Mempin M, Hu H, Chowdhury D, et al. The A, B and C’s of silicone breast implants: anaplastic large cell lymphoma, biofilm and capsular contracture. Materials. 2018;11(12):2393–2404.
- Barr SP, Hill EW, Bayat A. Novel proteomic assay of breast implants reveals proteins with significant binding differences: implications for surface coating and biocompatibility. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(9):962–969.
- Atlan M, Nuti G, Wang H, et al. Breast implant surface texture impacts host tissue response. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;88:377–385.
- Derby BM, Codner MA. Textured silicone breast implant use in primary augmentation: core data update and review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(1):113–124.
- Glicksman CA, Danino MA, Efanov JI, et al. A step forward toward the understanding of the long-term pathogenesis of double capsule formation in macrotextured implants: a prospective histological analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(11):1191–1199.
- Montemurro P, Cheema M, Hedén P, et al. Role of macrotextured shaped extra full projection cohesive gel implants in primary aesthetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(4):408–418.
- Rubi CG, Lozano JA, Pérez-Espadero A, et al. Comparing round and anatomically shaped implants in augmentation mammaplasty: the experts' ability to differentiate the type of implant. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(1):60–64.
- Collett DJ, Rakhorst H, Lennox P, et al. Current risk estimate of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in textured breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(3S A Review of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma):30S–40S.
- Clemens MW, Jacobsen ED, Horwitz SM. 2019 NCCN Consensus Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(Suppl_1):S3–S13.
- BAPRAS. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from: http://www.bapras.org.uk/media-government/news-and-views/view/breast-implant-associated-anaplastic-large-cell-lymphoma-(bia-alcl)-bapras-statement.
- Breast implants and Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL): Information for clinicians and patients. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from: [https://www.gov.uk/guidance/breast-implants-and-anaplastic-large-cell-lymphoma-alcl.
- NCCN guidelines for breast cancer risk reduction. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast_risk.pdf.
- ASPS. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/for-medical-professionals/health-policy/bia-alcl-physician-resources.
- Cardoso MJ, Wyld L, Rubio IT, et al. EUSOMA position regarding breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and the use of textured implants. Breast. 2019;44:90–93.
- Tandon VJ, DeLong MR, Ballard TN, et al. Evolving trends in textured implant use for cosmetic augmentation in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(6):1456–1461.
- RCoA data. [cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from: https://www.rcoa.ac.uk/news-and-bulletin/rcoa-news-and-statements/nationwide-survey-of-all-uk-hospitals-shows-anaesthetic.
- Familusi OT, Doscher M, Manrique OJ, et al. Abdominal contouring: can the American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification System help determine when to say no? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(6):1211–1220.
- Saad AN, Parina R, Chang D, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes when plastic surgery procedures are combined. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(6):1415–1422.
- Danilla SV, Jara RP, Miranda F, et al. Is banning texturized implants to prevent breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma a rational decision? A meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness study. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(7):721–731.
- Deva AK, Cuss A, Magnusson M, et al. The "game of implants": a perspective on the crisis-prone history of breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(Suppl_1):S55–S65.
- Deva AK. A perspective on the never-ending cycle of breast implant crises. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(4):NP85–NP86.