A systematic review of direct preference measurements in health states treated with plastic surgery

References

• Henderson J. The plastic surgery postcode lottery in England. Int J Surg. 2009;7(6):550–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell J, Swinglehurst D, Greenhalgh T. 'Cosmetic boob jobs' or evidence-based breast surgery: an interpretive policy analysis of the rationing of 'low value' treatments in the English National Health Service. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook SA, Rosser R, Meah S, et al. Clinical decision guidelines for NHS cosmetic surgery: analysis of current limitations and recommendations for future development. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(5):429–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinno H, Dionisopoulos T, Slavin SA, et al. The utility of outcome studies in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2(7):e189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thoma A, Haines T, Veltri K, et al. A methodological guide to performing a cost-utility study comparing surgical techniques. Can J Plast Surg. 2004;12(4):179–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thoma A, McKnight LL. Quality-adjusted life-year as a surgical outcome measure: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(4):1279–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull. 2010;96:5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson E. Characterising needs in health care priority setting [PhD thesis]. Linköping: Linköping University; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UEMS. European Training Requirements for the Specialty of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, European Standards of Postgraduate Medical Specialist Training. Brussels: European Union of Medical Specialists/Union Européenne des médecins spécialistes (UEMS); 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt GH, et al. GRADE guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Coello PA, Guyatt GH, et al. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:83–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang WT, Collins ED, Kerrigan CL. An internet-based utility assessment of breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(2):370–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey JK, Ishii LE, Joseph AW, et al. The cost of facial deformity: a health utility and valuation study. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18(4):241–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno H, Tahiri Y, Thibaudeau S, et al. Cleft lip and palate: an objective measure outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(2):408–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun S, Hong P, Bezuhly M. Public perception of the burden of microtia. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(7):1665–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno HH, Thibaudeau S, Duggal A, et al. Utility scores for facial disfigurement requiring facial transplantation [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):443–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim AM, Sinno HH, Izadpanah A, et al. Population preferences of undergoing brachioplasty for arm laxity. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(Supplement 2):S149–S52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibrahim AM, Sinno HH, Lzadpanah A, et al. Mastopexy for breast ptosis: utility outcomes of population preferences. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2015;23(2):103–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibrahim AM, Sinno HH, Izadpanah A, et al. Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction following postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative utility assessment study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(4):e380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Izadpanah A, Sinno H, Vorstenbosch J, et al. Thigh laxity after massive weight loss: a utilities outcomes assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(3):304–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almadani YH, Gilardino MS. Cost-effectiveness analysis, psychosocial, and utility outcomes of early mandibular distraction in craniofacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(7):1888–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar AR, Ishii M, Papel I, et al. The health utility and valuation of cosmetic rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020;22(4):268–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen D, Ishii M, Nellis J, et al. Assessment of casual observers' willingness to pay for increased attractiveness through rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21(1):27–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su P, Ishii LE, Joseph A, et al. Societal value of surgery for facial reanimation. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017;19(2):139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Kneeland TS, et al. Measuring health state preferences in women with breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(2):280–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldihan K, Alnasyan A, Albassam A, et al. Comparing the health burden of living with nasal deformity in actual patients and healthy individuals: a utility outcomes score assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(4):381–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuback J, Yarascavitch B, Yarascavitch A, et al. Measuring utilities of severe facial disfigurement and composite tissue allotransplantation of the face in patients with severe face and neck burns from the perspectives of the general public, medical experts and patients. Burns. 2015;41(7):1524–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuta V, McNeely PD, Walling S, et al. Sagittal craniosynostosis: a utility outcomes study. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;20(2):113–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiser A, Jowett N, Occhiogrosso J, et al. Societal-perceived health utility of hypertrophic facial port-wine stain and laser treatment. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020;22(5):327–335.
   Google Scholar
• Faris C, Heiser A, Quatela O, et al. Health utility of rhinectomy, surgical nasal reconstruction, and prosthetic rehabilitation. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(7):1674–1679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abt NB, Quatela O, Heiser A, et al. Association of hair loss with health utility measurements before and after hair transplant surgery in men and women. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018;20(6):495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris C, Tessler O, Heiser A, et al. Evaluation of societal health utility of facial palsy and facial reanimation. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018;20(6):480–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Deverill M. A checklist for judging preference-based measures of health related quality of life: learning from psychometrics. Health Econ. 1999;8(1):41–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno H, Izadpanah A, Tahiri Y, et al. The impact of living with severe lower extremity lymphedema: a utility outcomes score assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(2):210–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno H, Izadpanah A, Thibaudeau S, et al. An objective assessment of the perceived quality of life of living with bilateral mastectomy defect. Breast. 2013;22(2):168–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno H, Izadpanah A, Thibaudeau S, et al. The impact of living with a functional and aesthetic nasal deformity after primary rhinoplasty: a utility outcomes score assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69(4):431–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno H, Izadpanah A, Vorstenbosch J, et al. Living with a unilateral mastectomy defect: a utility assessment and outcomes study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014;30(5):313–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno H, Thibaudeau S, Izadpanah A, et al. Utility outcome scores for unilateral facial paralysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69(4):435–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno H, Thibaudeau S, Tahiri Y, et al. Utility assessment of body contouring after massive weight loss. Aesth Plast Surg. 2011;35(5):724–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno HH, Ibrahim AM, Izadpanah A, et al. Utility outcome assessment of the aging neck following massive weight loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(1):26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoma A, Veltri K, Khuthaila D, et al. Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(6):1650–1661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offodile AC, 2nd, Chatterjee A, Vallejo S, et al. A cost-utility analysis of the use of preoperative computed tomographic angiography in abdomen-based perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(4):662e–669e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoma A, Khuthaila D, Rockwell G, et al. Cost-utility analysis comparing free and pedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2003;23(4):287–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman CS, Friedstat JS, Edkins RE. Efficacy of intense pulsed light for the treatment of burn scar dyschromias: a pilot study to assess patient satisfaction, safety, and willingness to pay. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(Suppl 4):S204–S208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Heasman KZ, et al. Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making. 1990;10(1):58–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker JH, Furr A, Cunningham M, et al. Investigation of risk acceptance in facial transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(3):663–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeier PF, Goldstein MK, Holmes AM, et al. What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment? Med Decis Making. 2001;21(3):200–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett DJ, Goudy SL. Cleft lip and palate. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2014;22(4):573–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doctor JN, Bleichrodt H, Lin HJ. Health utility bias: a systematic review and meta-analytic evaluation. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(1):58–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandman L, Hansson E. An ethics analysis of the rationale for publicly funded plastic surgery. BMC Med Ethics. 2020 2;21(1):94.
   Google Scholar
• Parker PA, Youssef A, Walker S, et al. Short-term and long-term psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in women undergoing different surgical procedures for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(11):3078–3089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, et al. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(3):1060–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widstrom E, Seppala T. Willingness and ability to pay for unexpected dental expenses by Finnish adults. BMC Oral Health. 2012;12:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung LC, Ellstrom CL, Martin MC. A donor-site preference utility study for three flaps used in lower extremity microvascular reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66(1):59–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mericli AF, Rhines L, Bird J, et al. Immediate reconstruction of oncologic spinal wounds is cost-effective compared with conventional primary wound closure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(5):1182–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Saddawi-Konefka D, et al. A decision analysis of amputation versus reconstruction for severe open tibial fracture from the physician and patient perspectives. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66(2):185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar