Trends and characteristics of neurotization during breast reconstruction: perioperative outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP)

References

• Zurrida S, Veronesi U. Milestones in breast cancer treatment. Breast J. 2015;21(1):3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest AP. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet. 1983;1(8322):459–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsinger V, Hivelin M, Derder M, et al. Long-term follow-up of quality of life following DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(5):1361–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs DM, Djohan R, Knackstedt R, et al. Advances and current concepts in reconstructive surgery for breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2020;47(4):217–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugels J, Cornelissen AJM, Spiegel AJ, et al. Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(9):1229–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissler JM, Koltz PF, Carney MJ, et al. Sifting through the evidence: a comprehensive review and analysis of neurotization in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(3):550–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugels J, Cornelissen AJM, van Kuijk SMJ, et al. Sensory recovery of the breast following innervated and noninnervated DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(2):178e–188e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peled AW, Peled ZM. Nerve preservation and allografting for sensory innervation following immediate implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(7):e2332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2265–2274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer JP, Sieber B, Nelson JA, et al. Comprehensive outcome and cost analysis of free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction: an experience with 1303 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(2):195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(10):901–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenberg JS. Sense and sensibility: breast reconstruction with innervated TRAM flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;18(1):23–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel AJ, Menn ZK, Eldor L, et al. Breast reinnervation: DIEP neurotization using the third anterior intercostal nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2013;1(8):e72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Djohan R, Scomacao I, Knackstedt R, et al. Neurotization of the nipple-areolar complex after implant-based reconstruction: evaluation of sensation recovery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:S518–S519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo SCH, Kuo PJ, Yen YH, et al. Association between operation- and operator-related factors and surgical complications among patients undergoing free-flap reconstruction for head and neck cancers: a propensity score-matched study of 1,865 free-flap reconstructions. Microsurgery. 2019;39(6):528–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotha VS, Abadeer AI, Amdur RL, et al. A critical examination of length of stay in autologous breast reconstruction: a NSQIP analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;147(1):24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offodile AC, Aherrera A, Guo L. Risk factors associated with prolonged postoperative stay following free tissue transfer: an analysis of 2425 patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(6):1323–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers MM, Merkow RP, Halverson A, et al. Validation of new readmission data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):420–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slezak S, McGibbon B, Dellon AL. The sensational transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap: return of sensibility after TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;28(3):210–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlodinow AS, Ver Halen JP, Lim S, et al. Predictors of readmission after breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional analysis of 5012 patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(4):335–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins EG, Hamill JB, Kim HM, et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: one-year outcomes of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium (MROC) study. Ann Surg. 2018;267(1):164–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offodile AC, Gu C, Boukovalas S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in breast reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(1):65–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonde C, Khorasani H, Eriksen K, et al. Introducing the fast track surgery principles can reduce length of stay after autologous breast reconstruction using free flaps: a case control study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2015;49(6):367–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorarinsson A, Fröjd V, Kölby L, et al. A retrospective review of the incidence of various complications in different delayed breast reconstruction methods. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50(1):25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman RB, Sheingold SH, Orav EJ, et al. Readmissions, observation, and the hospital readmissions reduction program. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(16):1543–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar