References
- Llorca PM, Lançon C, Brignone M, et al. Can we well assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of a new drug versus others at the time of marketing authorization using mixed treatment comparisons? A detailed illustration with escitalopram. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2015 Sep 24;3. eCollection 2015. DOI:10.3402/jmahp.v3.26776.
- Thokagevistk K, Khemiri A, Dorey J, et al. Evolution of tiotropium efficacy vs. placebo over time for the maintenance therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: from investigational product to active reference. Value Health. 2015 Nov;18(7):A495. Epub 2015 Oct 20. .
- Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR task force on indirect treatment comparisons good research practices: part 1. Value Health. 2011;14:417_28.
- European Medicines Agency. Brintellix. 2013 [cited 2013 Oct 24]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/002717/WC500159447.pdf
- Tansey MJ, Pilgrim AJ, Lloyd K. Sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. J Neurol Sci. 1993 Jan;114(1):109–11.
- Winner P, Landy S, Richardson M, et al. Early intervention in migraine with sumatriptan tablets 50 mg versus 100 mg: a pooled analysis of data from six clinical trials. Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1785–1794.
- Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Roon KI, et al. Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:633–658.
- Migraine: Developing Drugs for Acute Treatment Guidance for Industry. (2018). Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm419465.pdf
- Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.; 2000. xvii+317. ISBN 0-471-49066-0.
- Thompson SG. Meta-analysis of clinical trials. In: Armitage P, Colton T, editors. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Chichester: Wiley; 1998. p. 2570–2579.
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006–1012. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
- Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Stark SR, et al. Sumatriptan-naproxen for acute treatment of migraine: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007 Apr 4;297(13):1443–1454.
- Sheftell FD, Dahlof CG, Brandes JL, et al. Two replicate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of the time to onset of pain relief in the acute treatment of migraine with a fast-disintegrating/rapid-release formulation of sumatriptan tablets. Clin Ther. 2005;27(4):407–417.
- Landy S, Savani N, Shackelford S, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan tablets administered during the mild-pain phase of menstrually associated migraine. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58(10):913–919.
- Winner P, Mannix LK, Putnam DG, et al. Pain-free results with sumatriptan taken at the first sign of migraine pain: 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(10):1214–1222.
- Hartnell NR, Wilson JP. Replication of the Weber effect using postmarketing adverse event reports voluntarily submitted to the USA food and drug administration. Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Jun;24(6):743–749.
- Hoffman KB, Dimbil M, Erdman CB, et al. The Weber effect and the USA Food and Drug Administration‘s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): analysis of sixty-two drugs approved from 2006 to 2010. Drug Saf. 2014 Apr;37(4):283–294.
- Tuttle AH, Tohyama S, Ramsay T, et al. Increasing placebo responses over time in U.S. clinical trials of neuropathic pain. Pain. 2015 Dec;156(12):2616–2626.