Machine-learning prediction for hospital length of stay using a French medico-administrative database

References

• Direction de la Recherche, des Études, de l’Évaluation et des Statistiques, “Les dépenses de santé en 2019 - Résultats des comptes de la santé - Édition 2020,” Vie publique.fr. cited 2022 Jan 11 Available from https://www.vie-publique.fr/rapport/276352-les-depenses-de-sante-en-2019-resultats-des-comptes-de-la-sante
   Google Scholar
• Baumann A, Wyss K. The shift from inpatient care to outpatient care in Switzerland since 2017: policy processes and the role of evidence. Health Policy. 2021 Apr;125(4):512–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exertier Les inadéquations hospitalières en France : fréquence, causes et impact économique , et al. In: Le panorama des établissements de santé (Paris: DREES) . 2011. 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas‐García A, Turner S, Pizzo E, et al. Impact and experiences of delayed discharge: a mixed‐studies systematic review. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):41–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marfil-Garza BA, et al. Risk factors associated with prolonged hospital length-of-stay: 18-year retrospective study of hospitalizations in a tertiary healthcare center in Mexico. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefera GM, Feyisa BB, Umeta GT, et al. Predictors of prolonged length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality among adult patients admitted at the surgical ward of Jimma University medical center, Ethiopia: prospective observational study. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020Jun;13:24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acion L, Kelmansky D, van der Laan M, et al. Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success. PLOS ONE. 2017 Apr;12(4):e0175383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn JM, Kim S, Ahn K-S, et al. A deep learning model for the detection of both advanced and early glaucoma using fundus photography. PLOS ONE. 2018 Nov;13(11):e0207982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chekroud AM, et al. Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;3(3):243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholipour C, Rahim F, Fakhree A, et al. Using an artificial neural networks (ANNs) model for prediction of intensive care unit (ICU) Outcome and length of stay at hospital in traumatic patients. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):OC19–OC23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuhn M, Johnson K, Applied Predictive Modeling. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2013. cited 2018 Sep 05. [Online]. Available from: //www.springer.com/us/book/9781461468486
   Google Scholar
• Ebinger J, et al. A machine learning algorithm predicts duration of hospitalization in COVID-19 patients. Intell Based Med. 2021Jan;5:100035.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mekhaldi RN, Caulier P, Chaabane S, et al. Using machine learning models to predict the length of stay in a hospital setting. Trends and innovations in information systems and technologies. Cham; 2020. 202–211. 10.1007/978-3-030-45688-7_21.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi S, et al. Prediction of general medical admission length of stay with natural language processing and deep learning: a pilot study. Intern Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;15(6):989–995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernández-Delgado M, Cernadas E, Barro S, et al. Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems? J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15:3133–3181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudemaghe T, Belhadj I. Data resource profile: the French national uniform hospital discharge data set database (PMSI). Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;46(2): 392–392. DOI:10.1093/ije/dyw359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams TA, Ho KM, Dobb GJ, et al. Effect of length of stay in intensive care unit on hospital and long-term mortality of critically ill adult patients. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;104(4):459–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan A, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients with prolonged intensive care unit length of stay after cardiac surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;93(2):565–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahesh B, Choong CK, Goldsmith K, et al. Prolonged stay in intensive care unit is a powerful predictor of adverse outcomes after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jul;94(1):109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker GJ, Strauch GO, Saranchak HJ. Outcome and cost of prolonged stay in the surgical intensive care unit. Arch Surg. 1984 Nov;119(11):1338–1342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laupland KB, Kirkpatrick AW, Kortbeek JB, et al. Long-term mortality outcome associated with prolonged admission to the ICU. Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):954–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampieri FG, et al. Admission factors associated with prolonged (>14 days) intensive care unit stay. J Crit Care. 2014 Feb;29(1):60–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre NR, Epstein SK, Carson S, et al. Management of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: report of a NAMDRC consensus conference. Chest. 2005 Dec;128(6):3937–3954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White AC. Long-term mechanical ventilation: management strategies. Respir Care. 2012 Jun;57(6):889–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld YJ, El-Sayed YY, Lyell DJ, et al. Risk factors for prolonged postpartum length of stay following cesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2015 Jul;32(9):825–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey J. Exploratory Data Analysis. 1st ed. Reading Mass: Pearson; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Everitt BS, Skrondal A. The Cambridge dictionary of statistics. 4th ed. Cambridge UK  New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Quan H, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Second Edition, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009. cited 2018 Sep 06. [Online]. Available from: //www.springer.com/us/book/9780387848570
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, et al. Classification and regression trees. Florida: CRC press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Jaotombo F, et al. Machine-learning prediction of unplanned 30-day rehospitalization using the French hospital medico-administrative database. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec;99(49):e22361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Random Forests. Mach Learn. 2001 Oct;45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman JH. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat. 2001 Oct;29(5):1189–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. Arbib MA, editor. Cambridge MA: A Bradford Book; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Goulet-Pelletier J-C, Cousineau D. A review of effect sizes and their confidence intervals, Part I: the Cohen’s d family. TQMP. 2018 Dec;14(4):242–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardhani NWS, Rochayani MY, Iriany A, et al., “Cross-validation metrics for evaluating classification performance on imbalanced data,” in 2019 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and its Applications (IC3INA), Oct. 2019, pp. 14–18. doi: 10.1109/IC3INA48034.2019.8949568.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Ling CX. Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng. 2005 Mar;17(3):299–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur H, Pannu HS, Malhi AK. A systematic review on imbalanced data challenges in machine learning: applications and solutions. ACM Comput Surv. 2019 Aug;52(4):1–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann A, Toloşi L, Sander O, et al. Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics. 2010 May;26(10):1340–1347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rossum G, De Boer J. Interactively testing remote servers using the python programming language. CWI Q. 1991 Dec;4(4):283–303.
   Google Scholar
• Pedregosa F, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chollet F, “Keras,” GitHub repository, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://github.com/fchollet/keras%7D%7D
   Google Scholar
• Lequertier V, Wang T, Fondrevelle J, et al. Hospital length of stay prediction methods: a systematic review. Med Care. 2021 Oct;59(10):929–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi S, Tan Y, Oakden-Rayner L, et al. Machine learning in the prediction of medical inpatient length of stay. Intern Med J. 2020. DOI:10.1111/imj.14962
   Google Scholar
• Rachda Naila M, Caulier P, Chaabane S, et al. A comparative study of machine learning models for predicting length of stay in hospitals. J Inf Sci. 2021 Sep;37:1025–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Cawley GC, Talbot NLC. On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. J Mach Learn Res. 2010;11(70):2079–2107.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: bootstrap resampling methods. BMJ. 2015Jun;350:h2622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasel KJ, Lim HJ, Nirula R, et al. Length of stay: an appropriate quality measure? Arch Surg. 2007 May;142(5):461–466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lisk R, et al. Predictive model of length of stay in hospital among older patients. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Jul;31(7):993–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskas P, Pons-Peyneau C, Romdhani M, et al. Hospital discharge decisions concerning older patients: understanding the underlying process. Canad J Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. 2019 Mar;38(1):90–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendlmeier I, Bickel H, Heßler-Kaufmann JB, et al. Care challenges in older general hospital patients. Z Gerontol Geriat. 2019 Nov;52(4):212–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talari K, Goyal M. Retrospective studies – utility and caveats. J R College Physicians Edinburgh. 2020 Dec;50(4):398–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofthagen C. Threats to validity in retrospective studies. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2012;3(3):181–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen T, Guestrin C, “XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA, Aug. 2016, pp. 785–794. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785.
   Google Scholar
• Ke Guolin, Meng, Qi, Finley, Thomas, Wang, Taifeng, Chen, Wei, Ma, Weidong, Ye, Qiwei, Liu, Tie-Yan LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2-4 December Long Beach, CA. In: . Vol. 30 Guyon, Isabelle, von Luxburg, Ulrike, Bengio, Samy, Wallach, Hanna M., Fergus, Rob, Vishwanathan, S. V. N., Garnett, Roman 3149–3157 . 2017. Available fromhttps://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/6449f44a102fde848669bdd9eb6b76fa-Abstract.html
   Google Scholar
• Prokhorenkova Liudmila, Gusev Gleb, Vorobev Aleksandr, Dorogush, Anna Veronika, Gulin, Andrey CatBoost: Unbiased Boosting with Categorical Features . Vol. 31 (NY: Curran Associates Inc.)6639–6649. 2018. NIPS'18: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing System 3-8 December 2018 Montréal, Canada. Available fromhttps://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/hash/14491b756b3a51daac41c24863285549-Abstract.html
   Google Scholar
• Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S. Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy. 2021 Jan;23(1, Art. no. 1):DOI:10.3390/e23010018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg SM, et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1, Art. no. 1). DOI:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erickson N, et al., “AutoGluon-tabular: robust and accurate AutoML for structured data.” arXiv, Mar. 13, 2020. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2003.06505
   Google Scholar