The challenges of recruiting never-smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from the large population-based Swedish CArdiopulmonary bioImage study (SCAPIS) cohort

References

• Agustí A, Celli BR, Criner GJ, et al. Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease 2023 report: GOLD executive summary. Eur Respir J. 2023;61(4):2300239. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00239-2023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Guzman E, Mannino DM. Epidemiology and prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med. 2014;35(1):7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2013.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeloye D, Song P, Zhu Y, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019: a systematic review and modelling analysis. The Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10(5):447–458. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00511-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang IA, Jenkins CR, Salvi SS. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in never-smokers: risk factors, pathogenesis, and implications for prevention and treatment. The Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10(5):497–511. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00506-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström G, Berglund G, Blomberg A, et al. The Swedish CArdioPulmonary BioImage study: objectives and design. J Intern Med. 2015;278(6):645–659. doi: 10.1111/joim.12384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, et al. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report working party standardization of lung function tests, European community for steel and coal. Official statement of the European respiratory society. Eur Respir J. 1993;6(Suppl 16):5–40. doi: 10.1183/09041950.005s1693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonander C, Nilsson A, Björk J, et al. The value of combining individual and small area sociodemographic data for assessing and handling selective participation in cohort studies: evidence from the Swedish cardiopulmonary bioimage study. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0265088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanojevic S, Quanjer P, Miller MR, et al. The global lung function initiative: dispelling some myths of lung function test interpretation. Breathe. 2013;9(6):462–474. doi: 10.1183/20734735.012113
   Google Scholar
• ERS. The Global Lung Function Initiative GLI, calculators for Spirometry, TLCO and Lung volume. ERS European Respiratory Society; 2021 [ 2021 Version 2.0] https://gli-calculator.Ersnet.org/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Forster HP, Emanuel E, Grady C. The 2000 revision of the declaration of Helsinki: a step forward or more confusion? Lancet (London, England). The Lancet. 2001;358(9291):1449–1453. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06534-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM. The St george’s respiratory Questionnaire. Respir Med. 1991;85:25–31; discussion 3-7.doi: 10.1016/S0954-6111(06)80166-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, et al. Development and first validation of the COPD assessment test. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(3):648–654. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00102509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bestall JC, Paul EA, Garrod R, et al. Usefulness of the medical research council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 1999;54(7):581–586. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.7.581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamprecht B, McBurnie MA, Vollmer WM, et al. COPD in never smokers: results from the population-based burden of obstructive lung disease study. Chest. 2011;139(4):752–763. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg A, Linder R, Backman H, et al. From COPD epidemiology to studies of pathophysiological disease mechanisms: challenges with regard to study design and recruitment process: respiratory and cardiovascular effects in COPD (KOLIN). Eur Clin Respir J. 2017;4(1):1415095. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2017.1415095
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Çolak Y, Afzal S, Nordestgaard BG, et al. Majority of never-smokers with airflow limitation do not have asthma: the Copenhagen General Population Study. Thorax. 2016;71(7):614–623. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzikhan N, Verhamme KMC, Hofman A, et al. Prevalence and incidence of COPD in smokers and non-smokers: the Rotterdam Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(8):785–792. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0132-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammut R, Griscti O, Norman IJ. Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;123:104058. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtom B, Baruch Y, Aguinis H, et al. Survey response rates: trends and a validity assessment framework. Hum Relat. 2022;75(8):1560–1584. doi: 10.1177/00187267211070769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams M, Caffrey L, McKevitt C. Barriers and opportunities for enhancing patient recruitment and retention in clinical research: findings from an interview study in an NHS academic health science centre. Health Res Policy Sys. 2015;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sajdak R, Trembath L, Thomas KS. The importance of standard operating procedures in clinical trials. J Nucl Med Technol. 2013;41(3):231–233. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.113.121467
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhatt SP, Y-I K, Wells JM, et al. FEV 1 /FEV 6 to diagnose airflow obstruction. comparisons with computed tomography and morbidity Indices. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(3):335–341. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201308-251OC
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lönn BB, Hörnsten Å, Styrke J, et al. Transitioning to the clinical research nurse role - a qualitative descriptive study. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(11):3817–3829. doi: 10.1111/jan.15397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron SD, Tan WC, Bourbeau J, et al. Diagnostic instability and reversals of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis in individuals with mild to moderate airflow obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(3):306–314. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201612-2531OC
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(5):948–968. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seccareccia F, Zuccaro P, Pacifici R, et al. Serum cotinine as a marker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure in epidemiological studies: the experience of the MATISS project. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18(6):487–492. doi: 10.1023/A:1024672522802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg A, Sköld CM, Grunewald J, et al. Assessing recent smoking status by measuring exhaled carbon monoxide levels. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(12):e28864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J, Rakovac I, Loyola E, et al. A comparison of self-reported to cotinine-detected smoking status among adults in Georgia. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(5):1007–1012. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, et al. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(7):1086–1093. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.84.7.1086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolstad S, Adler J, Rydén A. Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value Health. 2011;14(8):1101–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias C, Torgerson D. Does length of questionnaire matter? A randomised trial of response rates to a mailed questionnaire. J Health Serv Res & Policy. 2000;5(4):219–221. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500406
   PubMedGoogle Scholar