Learning from… (or “the need for queer pedagogies of space”)

References

• Allen, L. 2015. “Queer Pedagogy and the Limits of Thought: Teaching Sexualities at University.” Higher Education Research & Development, 34: 763–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, K. H. 2002. “Designing for Diversity: Implications for Architectural Education in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Architectural Education, 55: 257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applied Research Practices in Architecture. 2015. “Forensic Methodology Part 2: Research in Practice (Symposium Transcript). A.R.P.A. Journal, 3 [Online]. Available: http://www.arpajournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/forensicmethodology_session2.pdf [Accessed March 28 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Architexx Brown, L. A., A. J. Merrett, S. Rafson, and R. Washington. 2018. Now What?! Advocacy, activism, and alliances in American architecture since 1968 [Online]. Available: https://www.nowwhat-architexx.org/ [Accessed September 15 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Arcidi, P. 1994. “Defining Gay Design.” Progressive Architecture, 75: 36.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, E. 2017. “Building a Real Alternative: Women’s Design Service.” Field: A Free Journal for Architecture, 7: 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Betsky, A. 1994. “The Profession Closet Conundrum: How “Out” Can the Design Professions Be?” Architectural Record, 182: 36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsky, A. 1997. Queer Space: Architecture and Same-Sex Desire. New York, NY: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. & S. Chherawala, eds. 2017. Handbook: Supporting Queer and Trans Students in Art and Design Education. Toronto, ON: OCAD University.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnevier, K. 2017. The revue of STYLES. Architecture and Culture, 5: 353–369. doi:10.1080/20507828.2017.1375342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidwood, E. 2016. LGBT + survey highlights need for role models: Architects have called for more role models representing sexual and gender minorities in prominent positions in the industry following the AJ’s 2016 lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender survey. Architects’ Journal, 243: 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. P. 1995. Is there a queer pedagogy? Or, stop reading straight. Educational Theory, 45, 151–165. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1995.00151.x.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. A. 2013. Contested Spaces: Abortion Clinics, Women’s Shelters and Hospitals: Politicizing the Female Body. New York, NY: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Cahn, E. 2014. “Project Space(s) in the Design Professions: An Intersectional Feminist Study of the Women’s School of Planning and Architecture (1974–1981).” PhD diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, S. L. 2010. Queering bathrooms: Gender, sexuality, and the hygienic imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colomina, B., ed. 1992. Sexuality & Space. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colomina, B. 1994. Privacy and publicity: Modern architecture as mass media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, G. 2013. “What About Denise?” New Yorker. [Online]. Available: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/what-about-denise [Accessed October 14, 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Culzac, N. 2014. “Egypt’s Police ‘Using Social Media and Apps Like Grindr to Trap Gay People’.” The Independent. [Online] Avaliable: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/egypts-police-using-social-media-and-apps-like-grindr-to-trap-gay-people-9738515.html [Accessed October 14, 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. & Getsy, D. 2013. Queer formalisms: Jennifer Doyle and David Getsy in conversation. Art Journal, 72, 58–71. doi:10.1080/00043249.2013.10792864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, T. A., ed. 1991. Voices in architectural education: Cultural politics and pedagogy. New York, NY: Bergin and Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Fujiki, M. 2018. Architecture’s crisis is deeper than #MeToo. The Architect’s Newspaper [Online]. Available: https://archpaper.com/2018/05/architectures-crisis-is-deeper-than-metoo/ [Accessed October 14, 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Groat, L. N. 1993. Architecture’s resistance to diversity: A matter of theory as much as practice. Journal of Architectural Education, 47: 3–10. doi:10.2307/1425223.
   Google Scholar
• Gürel, M. Ö. & K. H. Anthony. 2006. The canon and the void: gender, race, and the architectural history texts. Journal of Architectural Education, 59: 66–76. doi:10.1111/j.1531-314X.2006.00036.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J. 2011. The Queer Art of Failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hosey, L. 2001. Hidden lines: Gender, race, and the body in “Graphic Standards”. Journal of Architectural Education, 55, 101–112. doi:10.1162/104648801753199527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, G. B., A.-M. Bouthillette, & Y. Retter. 1997. “Making Rooms: Queerscape Architectures and the Spaces of Activism.” In Queers in Space: Communities|Public Places|Sites of Resistance, edited by G. B. Ingram, A.-M. Bouthillette, & Y. Retter. Seattle, 373–380. WA: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaque, A. 2017. “Grindr Archiurbanism.” Log, 41: 74–84.
   Google Scholar
• Killian, N. 2018. How will we queer design education without compromise? Walker Soundboard [Online]. Available: https://walkerart.org/magazine/soundboard-queering-design-education-kristina-ketola-bore [Accessed October 29, 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, J. & Betsky, A. 2017. “The end of queer space?” Log, 41: 85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kumashiro, K. K. 2002. Troubling Education: Queer Activism and Antioppressive Pedagogy. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Labonne, L. 2017. “Metamorphosis by Lesley Labonne - Monash University (Australia)/Instructors: Luca Lana & Virginia Mannering (2017).” The Funambulist, 13: 58–59.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, A. 2010. Whatever happened to architecture critique? Design Observer [Online]. Available: https://designobserver.com/feature/whatever-happened-to-architecture-critique/22808 [Accessed October 30, 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Lange, T. & Scott, E. E. 2017. “Making Trouble to Stay With: Architecture and Feminist Pedagogies.” Field: A Free Journal for Architecture 7: 89–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2018. “Architecture Gives a Star A Free Pass.” New York Times, 168: A21.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, N. 2006. “Criticism Today: Chasing Celebrities, Globalization, and the Web.” Architectural Record, 194: 63–65.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, S. 1998. “Queering/Querying Pedagogy? Or, Pedagogy is a Pretty Queer Thing.” In Queer Theory in Education, edited by W. F. Pinar, Mahwah, 120–132. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, E. 1992. Sheila Levrant de Bretteville: Dirty Design and Fuzzy Theory. Eye [Online]. Available: https://elupton.com/interviews/.
   Google Scholar
• Merrett, A. n.d. Radical Pedagogies: The Women’s School of Planning and Architecture [Online]. Available: http://radical-pedagogies.com/search-cases/a32-school-planning-architecture-wspa/ [Accessed November 2, 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J. E. 2009. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity, New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pogrebin, R. 2013. “Partner Without the Prize.” New York Times, 163: C1.
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, J. 2016. “The Pink Elephant in the Room: What Ever Happened to Queer Theory in the Study of Interior Design 25 Years On?” Journal of Interior Design 41: 5–11. doi:10.1111/joid.12068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preciado, B. 2012. “Architecture as a Practice of Biopolitical Disobedience.” Log, 25: 121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Ricco, J. P. 1994. “Coming Together: Jack-off Rooms as Minor Architecture.” A/R/C, Architecture, Research, Criticism 1: 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ricco, J. P. 2002. The Logic of the Lure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J. 2004. “Curtain Wars: Architects, Decorators, and the Twentieth-Century Domestic Interior.” In Joel Sanders: Writings and Projects, edited by J. Sanders, 86–93. New York, NY: The Monacelli Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J. 2017. “From Stud to Stalled! Architecture in Transition.” Log, 41: 145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J. & Stryker, S. 2016. “Stalled: Gender-neutral Public Bathrooms.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 115: 779–788. doi:10.1215/00382876-3656191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilt, K. & Westbrook, L. 2015. “Bathroom Battlegrounds and Penis Panics.” Contexts 14: 26–31. doi:10.1177/1536504215596943.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, N. 2003. “Three Complaints About Architectural Criticism.” Architecture Australia 92: 50–52.
   Google Scholar
• Stratigakos, D. 2012. Why architects need feminism. Places [Online]. Available: http://places.designobserver.com/feature/why-architects-need-feminism/35448/.
   Google Scholar
• Stratigakos, D. 2016. Where are the Women Architects? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumara, D. & Davis, B. 1999. “Interrupting Heteronormativity: Toward a Queer Curriculum Theory.” Curriculum Inquiry 29: 191–208. doi:10.1111/0362-6784.00121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tattelman, I. 1997. The meaning at the wall: Tracing the gay bathhouse. In Queers in Space: Communities | Public Places | Sites of Resistance, edited by G. B. Ingram, A.-M. Bouthillette, & Y. Retter. Seattle, 391–406. WA: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tattelman, I. 2005. “Staging Sex and Masculinity at the Mineshaft.” Men and Masculinities 7: 300–309. doi:10.1177/1097184X04272120.
   Google Scholar
• The Museum of Modern Art. Andrés Jaque/Ikea Disobedients/2011 [Online]. The Museum of Modern Art. Available: https://www.moma.org/collection/works/156886 [Accessed March 28 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Tschumi, B. 1996. Architecture and Disjunction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbach, H. 1993. “Spatial Rubbing: The Zone.” Sites, 25: 90–95.
   Google Scholar
• Urbach, H. 2000. “Dark Lights, Contagious Space.” In InterSections: Architectural Histories and Critical Theories, edited by J. Rendell & I. Borden, 150–160. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vallerand, O. 2013. “Home is the Place We All Share: Building Queer Collective Utopias.” Journal of Architectural Education 67: 64–75. doi:10.1080/10464883.2013.767125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, O. 2016. Regards queers sur l'architecture: une remise en question des approches identitaires de l'espace. Captures: Figures, théories et pratiques de l'imaginaire [Online], 1. Available: http://www.revuecaptures.org/node/349/.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, C. W. 2016. “Surveys, Seminars, and Starchitects: Gender Studies and Architectural History Pedagogy in American Architectural Education.” In A Gendered Profession, edited by J. B. Brown, H. Harriss, R. Morrow & J. Soane, 200–208. London, UK: RIBA Publishing.
   Google Scholar