Strengthening intermediaries in the National System of Innovation (NSI): Case of the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions

References

• Agogué, M., E. Berthet, T. Fredberg, P. Le Masson, B. Segrestin, M. Stoetzel, M. Wiener, and A. Yström. 2017. “Explicating the Role of Innovation Intermediaries in the “Unknown”: A Contingency Approach.” Journal of Strategy and Management 10 (1): 19–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-01-2015-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agogué, M., A. Yström, and P. Le Masson. 2013. “Rethinking the Role of Intermediaries as an Architect of Collective Exploration and Creation of Knowledge in Open Innovation.” International Journal of Innovation Management 17 (2): 1–24. Hal-00707376.
   Google Scholar
• Bernanke, B. S. 2011. “Promoting Research and Development: The Governments Role.” Issues in Science and Technology 27 (4): 37–41. https://issues.org/bernanke/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., and R. Stankiewicz. 1995. “On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems.” In Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation, edited by B. Carlsson, 21–56. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Chunhavuthiyanon, M., and P. Intarakumnerd. 2014. “The Role of Intermediaries in Sectoral Innovation Systems: The Case of Thailand’s Food Industry.” International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 13 (1): 15–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd.13.1.15_1.
   Google Scholar
• Cimoli, M., G. Dosi, and J. Stiglitz. 2009. Industrial Policy and Development: Political Economy of Capabilities, Accumulation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cloete, N., P. Maassen, and T. Bailey, eds. 2015. Knowledge Production and Contradictory Functions in African Higher Education. Cape Town: African Minds.
   Google Scholar
• (DACST) Department of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology. 1996. White Paper on Science and Technology: Preparing for the 21st Century. Pretoria. Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Dalziel, M., and S. Parjanen. 2018. “Measuring the Impact of Innovation Intermediaries: A Case of Tekes.” In Practice-Based Innovation Insights, Application and Policy Implications, edited by H. Melkas, and V. Harmaakorpi, 117–132. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva, M., J. Howells, and M. Meyer. 2017. “Innovation Intermediaries and Collaboration: Knowledge-Based Practices and Internal Value Creation.” Research Policy 47: 70–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DST (Department of Science and Technology). 1996. White Paper on Science and Technology: Preparing for the 21st Century. Pretoria: Department of Science and Technology. Accessed November 18, 2012. http://www.dst.gov.za/index.php/legal-statutory/white-papers/361-science-a-technology-white-paper.
   Google Scholar
• DST (Department of Science and Technology). 2019. White Paper on Science, Technology and Innovation, Science Technology and Innovation Enabling Inclusive and Sustainable South African Development in a Changing World. Pretoria: DST.
   Google Scholar
• Dutrénit, G., A. Rocha-Lackiz, and A. O. Vera-Cruz. 2012. “Functions of the Intermediary Organizations for Agricultural Innovation in Mexico: The Chiapas Produce.” Review of Policy Research 29 (6): 693–712. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00589.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggink, M. E. 2012. “The Role of Innovation in Economic Development.” D.Com. thesis., University of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2000. Lisbon European Council 23/24 March 2000–Presidency Conclusions. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Fongwa, S. N. 2018. “South Africa’s Knowledge-Development Policy Nexus: Implications for Place-Based Development in the Eastern Cape Province.” Development Southern Africa 35 (5): 626–640. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2017.1405798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fongwa, S., and B. Mncwango. 2017. The Role of the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP) and its Voluntary Associations in the National System of Innovation. Pretoria: HSRC.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1988. “Japan: A New National Innovation Systems?” In Technical Change and Economic Theory, edited by G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete, 330–348. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 2005. “The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 33–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J. 2006. “Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation.” Research Policy 35 (5): 715–728. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H., and P. Sabatier. 1994. “Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Journal of Public Policy 14 (2): 175–203.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time has Come.” Educational Researcher 33 (7): 14–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014.
   Google Scholar
• Kautto, P. 2007. “Industry–Government Interaction in the Preparation of a New Directive: Nokia, Industry Associations and EuP.” European Environment 17 (2): 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., and C. Leeuwis. 2009. “Establishment and Embedding of Innovation Brokers at Different Innovation System Levels: Insights from the Dutch Agricultural Sector.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (6): 849–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kshetri, N., and N. Dholakia. 2009. “Professional and Trade Associations in a Nascent and Formative Sector of a Developing Economy: A Case Study of the NASSCOM Effect on the Indian Offshoring Industry.” Journal of International Management 15 (2): 225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A. 2010. “From Ivory-Tower Traditionalists to Entrepreneurial Scientists’? Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University-Industry Boundaries.” Social Studies of Science 40 (2): 307–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. 1988. “Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation.” In Technical Change and Economic Theory, edited by G. Dosi, 349–369. London, New York: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. Å. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. Å. 1995. “The Learning Economy – Challenges to Economic Theory and Policy.” Revised version of a paper presented to the EAEPE Conference (October 1994), Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, J. D. K. 2001. “The Role of Intermediating Institutions in the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): How Industry Associations Intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong.” The Information Society 17 (3): 195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, S. T. 2012. “The National System of Innovation Concept: An Ontological Review and Critique.” South African Journal of Science 108 (9-10): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. S., and R. Ramlogan. 2008. “Innovation Systems and the Competitive Process in Developing Economies.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 48 (2): 433–446.
   Google Scholar
• Nasierowski, W. 2009. “A Conceptual Framework for Formalization of National Innovation Systems.” Foundations of Management 1 (2): 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. 1988. “Institutions Supporting Technical Change in the United States.” In Technical Change and Economic Theory, edited by G. Dosi, 312–329. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R., and N. Rosenberg. 1993. “Technical Innovation and National Systems.” In National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, edited by R. Nelson, 3–21. New York, Oxford: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• NPC (National Planning Commission). 2011. The National Development Plan; Vision 2030. Republic of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for European Cooperation and Development). 1997. National Innovation Systems OECD Publications. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 2001. Innovation and Competitiveness: Findings on the Netherlands. The Hague NL: Innovation Lecture 2001, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, V., H. Bhorat, M. Powell, M. Visser, and F. Arends. 2016. Skills Supply and Demand in South Africa. Pretoria: LMIP Publication, HSRC.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. 1991. “Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process.” PS: Political Science & Politics 24 (02): 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. R., and S. Maxfield. 1997. “Business, the State, and Economic Performance in Developing Countries.” In Business and the State in Developing Countries, edited by S. Maxfield, and B. R. Schneider, 3–35. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., S. Hielscher, T. Hargreaves, M. Martiskainen, and A. Smith. 2014. “A Grassroots Sustainable Energy Niche? Reflections on Community Energy in the UK.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 13: 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sine, W. D., S. Shane, and D. Di Gregorio. 2003. “The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions.” Management Science 49 (4): 478–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, R., and S. Kuhlman. 2004. “The Rise of Systemic Instruments in Innovation Policy.” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1 (1/2): 4–30.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., and S. Hyysalo. 2008. “Intermediaries, Users and Social Learning in Technological Innovation.” International Journal of Innovation Management 12 (3): 295–325.
   Google Scholar
• Sutthijakra, S., and P. Intarakumnerd. 2015. “Role and Capabilities of Intermediaries in University–Industry Linkages: A Case of Hard Disk Drive Industry in Thailand.” Science, Technology and Society 20 (2): 182–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szogs, A., A. Cummings, and C. Chaminade. 2011. “Building Systems of Innovation in Less Developed Countries: The Role of Intermediate Organizations Supporting Interactions in Tanzania and El Salvador.” Innovation and Development 1: 283–302.
   Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G. 1996. “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal 17: 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo, B., B. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, N. Ozor, and M. Bolo. 2019. “Open Innovation and Innovation Intermediaries in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal 11 (2): pages 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Welie, M. J., W. P. C. Boon, and B. Truffer. 2020. “Innovation System Formation in International Development Cooperation: The Role of Intermediaries in Urban Sanitation.” Science and Public Policy, 47 (3): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viotti, E. B. 2002. “National Learning Systems: A New Approach on Technological Change in the Late Industrializing Economies and Evidence From the Cases of Brazil and South Korea.” Technological Forecasting Social Change 69 (7): 653–680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00167-6.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, A., T. Papaioannou, J. Mugwagwa, and D. Kale. 2015. “National Innovation Systems and the Intermediary Role of Industry Associations in Building Institutional Capacities for Innovation in Developing Countries: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Research Policy 44: 1407–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2002. Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education. Washington DC.: A World Bank Analytical Report, Education Group, Human Development Network.
   Google Scholar