http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4569-1090
References
- artmetro, arquitetos associados. 2011. Centro Interpretativo da Memória do Vale do Tua drawings. Guimarães: Architecture School Study Centre of University of Minho.
- Bouffier, L., Charlot, C., Raffin, A., Rozenberg, P. and Kremer, A. 2008. Can wood density be efficiently selected at early stage in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.)? Annals of Forest Science. 65(1): 106p1–106p8. doi: 10.1051/forest:2007078
- Calderoni, C., De Matteis, G., Giubileo, C. and Mazzolani, F. M. 2010. Experimental correlations between destructive and non-destructive tests on ancient timber elements. Engineering Structures. 32(2): 442–448. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.10.006
- Cavalli, A. and Togni, M. 2013. How to improve the on-site MOE assessment of old timber beams combining NDT and visual strength grading. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation. 28(3): 252–262. doi: 10.1080/10589759.2013.764424
- CEN. 2009. EN 338:2009. Structural timber – strength classes. Brussels: CEN European Committee for Standardization.
- Cruz, H., Yeomans, D., Tsakanika, E., Macchioni, N., Jorissen, A., Touza, M., Mannucci, M. and Lourenço, P. B. 2015. Guidelines for the on-site assessment of historic timber structures. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. 9(3): 277–289. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2013.774070
- Feio, A. and Machado, J. S. 2015. In-situ assessment of timber structural members: combining information from visual strength grading and NDT/SDT methods – a review. Construction and Building Materials. 101: 1157–1165. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.123
- Franke, S., Franke, B. and Harte, A. M. 2015. Failure modes and reinforcement techniques for timber beams – State of the art. Construction and Building Materials. 97: 2–13. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.021
- Görlacher, R. 1987. Non destructive testing of wood: an in-situ method for determination of density. Holz as Roh-und Werkstoff. 45: 273–278. doi: 10.1007/BF02608673
- Hasnikova, H. and Kuklík, P. 2013. Investigation of timber members at the Marasyk Station in Prague by non-destructive methods. Advanced Materials Research. 778: 243–249. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.778.243
- Notivol, E., Gil, L. A. and Pardos, J. A. 1992. Wood specific gravity and variability estimation in Pinus pinaster Ait. trees. Forest Systems. 1(1): 41–47.
- Riggio, M., Macchioni, N. and Riminesi, C. 2016. Structural health assessment of historical timber structures combining non-destructive techniques: the roof of Giotto’s bell tower in Florence. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. doi:10.1002/stc.1935.
- Sousa, H. S., Branco, J. M. and Lourenço, P. B. 2014. Characterization of cross-sections from old chestnut beams weakened by decay. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. 8(3): 436–451. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2013.826303
- Tannert, T., Anthony, R. W., Kasal, B., Kloiber, M., Piazza, M., Riggio, M., Rinn, F., Widmann, R. and Yamaguchi, N. 2014. In situ assessment of structural timber using semi-destructive techniques. Materials and Structures. 47(5): 767–785. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0094-5
- UNI. 2004. UNI 11119:2004 cultural heritage – wooden artifacts – load-bearing structures – on site inspections for the diagnosis of timber members. Milan: UNI Milano.
- UNI. 2010. UNI 11035-2 Structural timber. Visual strength grading rules and characteristic values for Italian structural timber population. Milan: UNI Milano.