The effect of substrate disturbance on benthic invertebrates in old-growth broad-leaved forest and planted conifer forest basin streams in Japan

References

• Bruno MC, Maiolini B, Carolli M. 2016. Settling distances of benthic invertebrates in a sediment mobilization simulation in semi-natural flumes. J Limnol. 75:180–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Death RG. 1996. The effect of patch disturbance on stream invertebrate community structure: the influence of disturbance history. Oecologia. 108:567–576. doi: 10.1007/BF00333735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Death RG. 2002. Predicting invertebrate diversity from disturbance regimes in forest streams. Oikos. 97:18–30. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970102.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Death RG, Zimmermann EM. 2005. Interaction between disturbance and primary productivity in determining stream invertebrate diversity. Oikos. 111:392–402. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13799.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolidon N, Hofer T, Jansky L, Sidle R. 2009. Watershed and forest management for landslide risk reduction. In: Sassa K, Canuti P, editors. Landslides - disaster risk reduction. Berlin (Germany): Springer-Verlag; p. 633–649.
   Google Scholar
• Effenberger M, Diehl S, Gerth M, Matthaei CD. 2011. Patchy bed disturbance and fish predation independently influence the distribution of stream invertebrates and algae. J Anim Ecol. 80:603–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01807.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effenberger M, Engel J, Diehl S, Matthaei CD. 2008. Disturbance history influences the distribution of stream invertebrates by altering microhabitat parameters: a field experiment. Freshwater Biol. 53:996–1011. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01959.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effenberger M, Sailer G, Townsend CR, Matthaei CD. 2006. Local disturbance history and habitat parameters influence the microdistribution of stream invertebrates. Freshwater Biol. 51:312–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerløv C, Hildrew AG, Jones JI. 2003. Mobility of stream invertebrates in relation to disturbance and refugia: a test of habitat templet theory. J N Am Benthol Soc. 22:207–223. doi: 10.2307/1467993
   Google Scholar
• Godbout L, Hynes HBN. 1982. The three dimensional distribution of the fauna in a single riffle in a stream in Ontario. Hydrobiologia. 97:87–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00014962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtz ME, Wallace JB. 1984. Substrate-mediated response of stream invertebrates to disturbance. Ecology. 65:1556–1569. doi: 10.2307/1939135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huston MA. 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am Nat. 113:81–101. doi: 10.1086/283366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahmen A, Perner J, Buchmann N. 2005. Diversity-dependent productivity in semi-natural grasslands following climate perturbations. Funct Ecol. 19:594–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsu K. 2004. Response of benthic invertebrates to disturbance from stream restoration: the importance of bryophytes. Hydrobiologia. 523:37–45. doi: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000033086.09499.86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen S, Ormerod SJ. 2010. Low-level effects of inert sediments on temperate stream invertebrates. Freshwater Biol. 55:476–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02282.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthaei CD, Arbuckle CJ, Townsend CR. 2000. Stable surface stones as refugia for invertebrates during disturbance in a New Zealand stream. J N Am Benthol Soc. 19:82–93. doi: 10.2307/1468283
   Google Scholar
• Matthaei CD, Townsend CR. 2000. Long-term effects of local disturbance history on mobile stream invertebrates. Oecologia. 125:119–126. doi: 10.1007/PL00008883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo AS, Niyogi DK, Matthaei CD, Townsend CR. 2003. Resistance, resilience, and patchiness of invertebrate assemblages in native tussock and pasture streams in New Zealand after a hydrological disturbance. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 60:731–739. doi: 10.1139/f03-061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menge BA. 1995. Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: patterns and importance. Ecol Monogr. 65:21–74. doi: 10.2307/2937158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt RW, Cummins KW. 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Dubuque (IA): Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake Y, Hiura T, Nakano S. 2005. Effects of frequent streambed disturbance on the diversity of stream invertebrates. Arch Hydrobiol. 162:465–480. doi: 10.1127/0003-9136/2005/0162-0465
   Google Scholar
• Oda T, Green MB, Urakawa R, Scanlon TM, Sebestyen SD, McGuire KJ, Katsuyama M, Fukuzawa K, Adams M, Ohte N. 2018. Stream runoff and nitrate recovery times after forest disturbance in the USA and Japan. Water Resour Res. 54:6042–6054. doi: 10.1029/2017WR021986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reice SR. 1994. Nonequilibrium determinant of biological community structure. Am Sci. 82:424–435.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser ZC, Pearson RG. 2018. Hydrology, hydraulics and scale influence macroinvertebrate responses to disturbance in tropical streams. J Freshwater Ecol. 33:1–17. doi: 10.1080/02705060.2017.1414001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS Inc. 2000. SYSTAT 10. Chicago (IL).
   Google Scholar
• Sarriquet PE, Delettre YR, Marmonier P. 2006. Effects of catchment disturbance on stream invertebrates: comparison of different habitats (vegetation, benthic and interstitial) using bio-ecological groups. Ann Limnol - Int J Lim. 42:205–219. doi: 10.1051/limn/2006022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwendel AC, Death RG, Fuller IC, Joy MK. 2011. Linking disturbance and stream invertebrate communities: how best to measure bed stability. J N Am Benthol Soc. 30:11–24. doi: 10.1899/09-172.1
   Google Scholar
• Studinski JM, Hartman KJ, Niles JM, Keyser P. 2012. The effects of riparian forest disturbance on stream temperature, sedimentation, and morphology. Hydrobiologia. 686:107–117. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1002-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuda M, Komatsu T. 1964. Aquatic insect communities of Yoshino River, four years after the Ise-wan typhoon. Jpn J Ecol. 14:43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ruijven J, Berendse F. 2010. Diversity enhances community recovery, but not resistance, after drought. J Ecol. 98:81–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01603.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimura M. 2007. Comparison of stream benthic invertebrate assemblages among forest types in the temperate region of Japan. Biodivers Conserv. 16:2137–2148. doi: 10.1007/s10531-006-9136-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimura M, Maeto K. 2006. Comparison of an aquatic invertebrate assemblage between an old-growth natural forest and planted coniferous forest basins in a Japanese temperate region: the Kuroson stream in the Shimanto River basin. Landsc Ecol Eng. 2:81–89. doi: 10.1007/s11355-006-0029-1
   Google Scholar