The role of modality: Auditory and visual distractors in Stroop interference

REFERENCES

• Cowan, N. (1989a). The reality of cross-modal Stroop effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 87–88. 10.3758/BF03208039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1989b). A reply to Miles, Madden, and Jones (1989): Mistakes and other flaws in the challenge to the cross-modal Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 82–84. 10.3758/BF03208037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N., & Barron, A. (1987). Cross-modal, auditory-visual Stroop interference and possible implications for speech memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 393–401. 10.3758/BF03203031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, R., Liang, C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750. 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittrich, K., & Stahl, C. (2011). Nonconcurrently presented auditory tones reduce distraction. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 714–719. 10.3758/s13414-010-0064-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue, S. E., Liotti, M., Perez, R. III., & Woldorff, M. G. (2012). Is conflict monitoring supramodal? Spatiotemporal dynamics of cognitive control processes in an auditory Stroop task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, E. M., Barrilleaux, K. M., & Cowan, N. (2006). Individual differences in the ability to avoid distracting sounds. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 90–108. 10.1080/09541440500216044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, E. M., & Cowan, N. (2001). Habituation to auditory distractors in a cross-modal, color word interference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 654–667. 10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, E. M., & Cowan, N. (2005). Coherence of the irrelevant-sound effect: Individual profiles of short-term memory and susceptibility to task-irrelevant materials. Memory & Cognition, 33, 664–675. 10.3758/BF03195333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, E. M., Cowan, N., & Valle-Inclan, F. (1998). The nature of cross-modal, color- word interference effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 761–767. 10.3758/BF03206061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, E. J., & Barber, P. J. (1981). An auditory Stroop effect with judgments of speaker gender. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 459–466. 10.3758/BF03204842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanauer, J. B., & Brooks, P. J. (2003). Developmental change in the cross-modal Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 359–366. 10.3758/BF03194567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2007). Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: Support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1050–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, K. A. (2011). The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 851–860. 10.1037/a0023437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497–509. 10.1037/0096-1523.9.4.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70. 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 75–82. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166–174. 10.3758/BF03197535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203. 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, M. E., & Kane, M. J. (2013). Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: Global versus local indices of executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 748–759. 10.1037/a0029200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, C., & Jones, D. M. (1989). The fallacy of the cross-modal Stroop effect: A rejoinder to Cowan (1989). Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 85–86. 10.3758/BF03208038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, C., Madden, C., & Jones, D. M. (1989). Cross-modal, auditory-visual Stroop interference: A reply to Cowan and Barron (1987). Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 77–81. 10.3758/BF03208036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, C. C., Elliott, E. M., Wiggers, J., Eaves, S. D., & Shelton, J. T. (2012). Goal neglect links Stroop interference with working memory capacity. Acta Psychologica, 141, 250–260. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., Andrés, P., & Barceló, F. (2011). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119, 374–380. 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010). Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2013–2025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof, K. R., Scheres, A., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2005). Delta plots in the study of individual differences: New tools reveal response inhibition deficits in AD/HD that are eliminated by methylphenidate treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 197–215. 10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risko, E. F., Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2006). Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: Color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 310–315. 10.3758/BF03193849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. L., & Hall, D. A. (2008). Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: A systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory Stroop tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1063–1078. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88–125. 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2005). The visual-auditory color-word Stroop asymmetry and its time course. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1325–1336. 10.3758/BF03193365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2010). Attention and facilitation: Converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 411–422. 10.1037/a0018523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2012). Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 135–150. 10.1080/17470218.2011.605152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruence has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 514–523. 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. R., & Cheesman, J. (2005). Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 132–138. 10.1037/h0087468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71–87. 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00013-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shimada, H. (1990). Effect of auditory presentation of words on color naming: The intermodal Stroop effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 1155–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speckman, P., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Pratte, M. (2008). Delta plots and coherent distribution ordering. American Statistician 62, 262–266. 10.1198/000313008X333493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (2000). Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 506–526. 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. 10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2012). Variation in working memory capacity and cognitive control: Goal maintenance and microadjustments of control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 326–355. 10.1080/17470218.2011.597865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar