In touch with numbers: Embodied and situated effects in number magnitude comparison

REFERENCES

• Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731–735. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00002-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. L., Bradshaw, J. A., & Nettleton, N. C. (1988). Movement initiation and control: Abduction, adduction and locus of limb. Neuropsychologia, 26, 701–709. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(88)90005-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. L., Bradshaw, J. A., & Nettleton, N. C. (1990). Abduction, adduction and hand differences in simple and serial movements. Neuropsychologia, 28, 917–931. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(90)90108-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, R. Y. C., Chang, E., Tzeng, O. L., & Wu, D. (2009). The common magnitude code underlying numerical and size processing for action but not for perception. Experimental Brain Research, 194, 553–562. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1730-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, R. Y. C., Wu, D. H., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Chang, E. C. (2012). Relative size of numerical magnitude induces a size-contrast effect on the grip scaling of reach-to-grasp movements. Cortex, 48, 1043–1051. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisomalis, S. (2004). A cognitive typology for numerical notation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14(1), 37–52. doi:10.1017/S0959774304000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, U., Fischer, U., Moeller, K., Sauter, C., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2010). The use of a digital dance mat for training kindergarten children in a magnitude comparison task. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences – Volume 1, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Danckert, J., & Goodale, M. A. (2001). Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 303–308. doi:10.1007/s002210000653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626–641. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Luca, S., & Pesenti, M. (2011). Finger numeral representations: More than just another symbolic code. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–3. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00272
   Google Scholar
• Domahs, F., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Willmes, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2010). Embodied numerosity: Implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures. Cognition, 116, 251–266. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H. (2003). Spatial representations in number processing – Evidence from a pointing task. Visual Cognition, 10, 493–508. doi:10.1080/13506280244000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44, 386–392. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H. (2012). A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied, and situated numerical cognition. Cognitive Processing, 13, 161–164. doi:10.1007/s10339-012-0477-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: Spatial-numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 260. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555–556. doi:10.1038/nn1066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2014). Spatial biases in mental arithmetic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1457–1460. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.927516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, U., Moeller, K., Bientzle, M., Cress, U., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011). Sensori-motor spatial training of number magnitude representation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 177–183. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0031-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk, J. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1985). The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space. Experimental Brain Research, 60, 159–178. doi:10.1007/BF00237028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1992). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 262–269. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracia-Bafalluy, M., & Noël, M.-P. (2008). Does finger training increase young children’s numerical performance? Cortex, 44, 368–375. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, K. J., & Lourenco, S. F. (2012). Orienting numbers in mental space: Horizontal organization trumps vertical. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1044–1051. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.685079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, T. M., & Cady, J. A. (2007). What is the value of @*#? Deepening teachers’ understanding of place value. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13, 434–437.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32, 662–673. doi:10.3758/BF03195857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. New York, NY: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamii, C. (1986). Place value: An explanation of its difficulty and educational implications for the primary grades. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 1, 75–86. doi:10.1080/02568548609594909
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A. Z., Song, J. H., & McPeek, R. M. (2011). The eye dominates in guiding attention during simultaneous eye and hand movements. Journal of Vision, 11(1), 9. doi:10.1167/11.1.9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbard, E. M., Michel, V., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science, 324, 1583–1585. doi:10.1126/science.1171599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Girardi, G., & Bekkering, H. (2007). Getting a grip on numbers: Numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1400–1409. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, T., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Fischer, U., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2013). Walk the number line – An embodied training of numerical concepts. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2, 74–84. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Link, T., Schwarz, E. J., Huber, S., Fischer, U., Nuerk, H.-C., Cress, U., & Moeller, K. (2014). Mathe mit der Matte – Verkörperlichtes training basisnumerischer kompetenzen [Maths on the mat: Embodied training of basic numerical competencies]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17, 257–277. doi:10.1007/s11618-014-0533-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107–157. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90052-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Basili, A. (1985). Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: Evidence from dyscalculia. Brain and Cognition, 4, 171–196. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(85)90069-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249–259. doi:10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., Nuerk, H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2009). Sequential or parallel decomposed processing of two-digit numbers? Evidence from eye-tracking. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 323–334. doi:10.1080/17470210801946740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, K., Klein, E., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011a). (No) small adults: Children’s processing of carry addition problems. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36, 702–720. doi:10.1080/87565641.2010.549880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, K., Klein, E., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011b). Three processes underlying the carry effect in addition – Evidence from eye tracking. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 623–645. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02034.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, K., Pixner, S., Zuber, J., Kaufmann, L., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011). Early place-value understanding as a precursor for later arithmetic performance—A longitudinal study on numerical development. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1837–1851. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myachykov, A., Scheepers, C., Fischer, M. H., & Kessler, K. (2014). TEST: A tropic, embodied, and situated theory of cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 442–460. doi:10.1111/tops.12024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., Klein, E., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Extending the mental number line. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 219(1), 3–22. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuerk, H.-C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition, 82(1), B25–B33. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00142-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Po, B. A., Fisher, B. D., & Booth, K. S. (2004). Mouse and touchscreen selection in the upper and lower visual fields. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, P. (2014). Low achievers’ understanding of place value – Materials, representations and consequences for instruction. In T. Wassong, D. Frischemeier, P. R. Fischer, R. Hochmuth, & P. Bender (Eds.), Mit werkzeugen mathematik und stochastik lernen [Using tools for learning mathematics and statistics] (pp. 43–56). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 651–664. doi:10.3758/BF03194909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers – A cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108, 590–599. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 328–331. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukoreff, R. W., & MacKenzie, I. S. (2004). Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 751–789. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S., & Dixon, P. (2011). Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale [Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology], 65, 84–97. doi:10.1037/a0022368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. M., Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2013). The link between mental rotation ability and basic numerical representations. Acta Psychologica, 144, 324–331. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science, 50, 489–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1995). A representational analysis of numeration systems. Cognition, 57, 271–295. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00674-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar