Rapid makes risky: Time pressure increases risk seeking in decisions from experience

References

• Ariely, D., & Zakay, D. (2001). A timely account of the role of duration in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 108, 187–207. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00034-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Zur, H., & Breznitz, S. J. (1981). The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychologica, 47, 89–104. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(81)90001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34, 816–835. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.34.7.816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432–459. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilleri, A. R., & Newell, B. R. (2011). When and why rare events are underweighted: A direct comparison of the sampling, partial feedback, full feedback and description choice paradigms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 377–384. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0040-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P. (2009). An architecture for dual reasoning. In J. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), Two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 109–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cella, M., Dymond, S., Cooper, A., & Turnbull, O. (2007). Effects of decision-phase time constraints on emotion-based learning in the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 64, 164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. J., & Pronin, E. (2012). Fast thought speed induces risk taking. Psychological Science, 23, 370–374. doi: 10.1177/0956797611431464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDonno, M. A., & Demaree, H. A. (2008). Perceived time pressure and the Iowa Gambling Task. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 636–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denrell, J., & March, J. G. (2001). Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organization Science, 12, 523–538. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.5.523.10092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, R., & Nowls, S. M. (1999). The effect of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 369–384. doi: 10.1086/209545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dror, I. E., Busemeyer, J. R., & Basola, B. (1999). Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models. Memory & Cognition, 27, 713–725. doi: 10.3758/BF03211564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erev, I., Ert, E., Roth, A. E., Haruvy, E., Herzog, S. M., Hau, R., … Lebiere, C. (2010). A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 15–47. doi: 10.1002/bdm.683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erev, I., Glozman, I., & Hertwig, R. (2008). What impacts the impact of rare events. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36, 153–177. doi: 10.1007/s11166-008-9035-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ert, E., & Yechiam, E. (2010). Consistent constructs in individuals’ risk taking in decisions from experience. Acta Psychologica, 134, 225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454–459. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstein, D. L., & Reilly, N. P. (1985). Group decision making under threat: The Tycoon game. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 613–627. doi: 10.2307/256117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, W. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (1992). The effect of “irrelevant” variables on decision making: Criterion shifts in preferential choice? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 425–454. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90028-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haith, A. M., Reppert, T. R., & Shadmehr, R. (2012). Evidence of hyperbolic temporal discounting of reward in control of movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 11727–11736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0424-12.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden, B. Y., & Platt, M. L. (2007). Temporal discounting predicts risk sensitivity in rhesus macaques. Current Biology, 17, 49–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbronner, S. R., & Hayden, B. Y. (2013). Contextual factors explain risk-seeking preferences in rhesus monkeys. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 7. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534–539. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertwig, R., & Erev, I. (2009). The description-experience gap in risky choice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 517–523. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Wang, D., Pang, K., Xu, G., & Guo, J. (2015). The effect of emotion and time pressure on risk decision-making. Journal of Risk Research, 18, 637–650. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2014.910688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, O., & Kunz, U. (2007). Time pressure in risky decision-making: Effect on risk defusing. Psychology Science, 49, 415–426.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution and intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292. doi: 10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. R., & Karau, S. J. (1999). Group decision making: The effects of initial preferences and time pressure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1342–1354. doi: 10.1177/0146167299259002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher, M. G., Pahlke, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2013). Tempus Fugit: Time pressure in risky decisions. Management Science, 59, 2380–2391. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvig, E. A., Madan, C. R., Pisklak, J. M., & Spetch, M. L. (2014). Reward context determines risky choice in pigeons and humans. Biology Letters, 10, 20140451. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvig, E. A., Madan, C. R., & Spetch, M. L. (2014). Extreme outcomes sway experience-based risky decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 146–156. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvig, E. A., Madan, C. R., & Spetch, M. L. (2015). Priming memories of past wins induces risk seeking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 24–29. doi: 10.1037/xge0000046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvig, E. A., & Spetch, M. L. (2011). Of black swans and tossed coins: Is the description-experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events? PLOS ONE, 6, e20262. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020262
   Google Scholar
• Madan, C. R. (2013). Toward a common theory for learning from reward, affect, and motivation: The SIMON framework. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 59. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madan, C. R., Fujiwara, E., Gerson, B. C., & Caplan, J. B. (2012). High reward makes items easier to remember, but harder to bind to a new temporal context. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 61. doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00061
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madan, C. R., Ludvig, E. A., & Spetch, M. L. (2014). Remembering the best and worst of times: Memories for extreme outcomes bias risky decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 629–636. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0542-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madan, C. R., & Spetch, M. L. (2012). Is the enhancement of memory due to reward driven by value or salience? Acta Psychologica, 139, 343–349. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maule, A. J., Hockey, G. R. J., & Bdzola, L. (2000). Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: Changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta Psychologica, 104, 283–301. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00033-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nursimulu, A. D., & Bossaerts, P. (2014). Risk and reward preferences under time pressure. Review of Finance, 18, 999–1022. doi: 10.1093/rof/rft013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66, 3–8. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)02994-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, A. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2002). Last-minute bidding and the rules of ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the internet. American Economic Review, 92, 1093–1103. doi: 10.1257/00028280260344632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. S., Siller, S., & Kacelnik, A. (2008). Simultaneous and sequential choice as a function of reward delay and magnitude: Normative, descriptive, and process-based models tested in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 75–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Current Biology, 21, R941–R945. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhav, A., & Buckner, R. L. (2014). Neural correlates of dueling affective reactions to win-win choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111, 10978–10983. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405725111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Shiffman, S. S. (2005). Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: A consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1340–1346. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., Dalgleish, L., Bucknall, T., Estabrooks, C., Hutchinson, A. M., Fraser, K., … Saunders, J. (2008). The effects of time pressure and experience on nurses’ risk assessment decisions. Nursing Research, 57, 302–311. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000313504.37970.f9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, P. N., O'Doherty, J. P., Dolan, R. J., & Schultz, W. (2006). Reward value coding distinct from risk attitude-related uncertainty coding in human reward systems. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 1621–1632. doi: 10.1152/jn.00745.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsetsos, K., Chater, N., & Usher, M. (2012). Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109, 9659–9664. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119569109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. L., Goodie, A. S., Hall, D. B., & Wu, E. (2012). Decision making under time pressure, modeled in a prospect theory framework. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakay, D., & Wooler, S. (1984). Time pressure, training and decision effectiveness. Ergonomics, 27, 273–284. doi: 10.1080/00140138408963489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigenfuse, M. D., Pleskac, T. J., & Liu, T. (2014). Rapid decisions from experience. Cognition, 131, 181–194. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar