Strategies for written additions in adults

REFERENCES

• Ardiale, E., Hodzik, S., & Lemaire, P. (2012). Aging and strategy switch costs: A study in arithmetic problem solving. L'AnnéePsychologique, 112, 345–360. doi:10.4074/S0003503312003028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, M. H., & Guillaume, M. M. (2009). Mathematical cognition and the problem size effect. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 121–151). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beishuizen, M. (1993). Mental strategies and materials or models for addition and subtraction up to 100 in Dutch second grades. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 294–323. doi:10.2307/749464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blöte, A. W., Van der Burg, E., & Klein, A. S. (2001). Students’ flexibility in solving two-digit addition and subtraction problems: Instruction effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 627–638. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2(2), 155–192. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0202_4
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. I. D., & Gunter, R. (2002). Calculation, culture, and the repeated operand effect. Cognition, 86, 71–96. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00138-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. I. D., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 299–315. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 353–386. doi:10.1080/09541440244000328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayol, M., & Thevenot, C. (2012). The use of procedural knowledge in simple addition and subtraction problems. Cognition, 123, 392–403. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Hiebert, J. C., Murray, H. G., Human, P. G., Olivier, A. I., … Fennema, E. (1997). Children's conceptual structures for multidigit numbers and methods of multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 130–162. doi:10.2307/749759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, H. P., Posner, J. K., & Russell, R. L. (1981). The development of knowledge concerning written arithmetic: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Psychology, 16, 13–34. doi:10.1080/00207598108247400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, H. J., Lemaire, P., & Dufau, S. (2007). Eye movement correlates of younger and older adults’ strategies for complex addition. ActaPsychologica, 125, 257–278. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen, G. J., & Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79, 329–343. doi:10.1037/h0032950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the number sense: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1457–1465. doi:10.1037/a0012682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickendorff, M., Heiser, W. J., Van Putten, C. M., & Verhelst, N. D. (2009). Solution strategies and achievement in Dutch complex arithmetic: Latent variable modeling of change. Psychometrika, 74, 331–350. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9074-z
   Google Scholar
• Imbo, I., Duverne, S., & Lemaire, P. (2007). Working memory, strategy execution, and strategy selection in mental arithmetic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1246–1264. doi:10.1080/17470210600943419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbo, I., Vandierendonck, A., & De Rammelaere, S. (2007). The role of working memory in the carry operation of mental arithmetic: Number and value of the carry. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 708–731. doi:10.1080/17470210600762447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamii, C., & Dominick, A. (1998). The harmful effects of algorithms in grades 1–4. In L. J. Morrow & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), The teaching and learning of algorithms in school mathematics: 1998 NCTM yearbook (pp. 130–140). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, E. P., & Ashcraft, M. K. (2001). Telling stories: The perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 157–175. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, E., Moeller, K., Dressel, K., Domahs, F., Wood, G., Willmes, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2010). To carry or not to carry—Is this the question? Disentangling the carry effect in multi-digit addition. ActaPsychologica, 135, 67–76. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeFevre, J.-A., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 216–230. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Callies, S. (2009). Children's strategies in complex arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 49–65. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Hinault, T. (2014). Age-related differences in sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects. A study in arithmetic problem solving. Experimental Psychology, 61, 253–262. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2010). Strategy switch costs in arithmetic problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 38, 322–332. doi:10.3758/MC.38.3.322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Reder, L. (1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 27, 364–382. doi:10.3758/BF03211420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsen, S., Verschaffel, L., Reynvoet, B., & De Smedt, B. (2014). The association between children's numerical magnitude processing and mental multi-digit subtraction. ActaPsychologica, 145, 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsen, S., Verschaffel, L., Reynvoet, B., & De Smedt, B. (2015). The association between numerical magnitude processing and mental versus algorithmic multi-digit subtraction in children. Learning and Instruction, 35, 42–50. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucangeli, D., Tressoldi, P. E., Bendotti, M., Bonanomi, M., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). Effective strategies for mental and written arithmetic calculation from the third to the fifth grade. Educational Psychology, 23, 507–520. doi:10.1080/0144341032000123769
   Google Scholar
• Lucidi, A., & Thevenot, C. (2014). Do not count on me to imagine how I act: Behavior contradicts questionnaire responses in the assessment of finger counting habits. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1079–1087. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0447-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luwel, K., Onghena, P., Torbeyns, J., Schillemans, V., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Strenghts and weaknesses in the choice/no-choice method in research on strategy use. European Psychologist, 14, 351–362. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.14.4.351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luwel, K., Schillemans, V., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost? British Journal of Psychology, 100, 753–771. doi:10.1348/000712609X402801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse, C., & Lemaire, P. (2001). On strategic combination: A case study of parity and five-rule effects in arithmetical problem solving. Psychological Research, 65, 28–33. doi:10.1007/s004260000030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., Aliminosa, D., & Sokol, S. M. (1991). Facts, rules and procedures in normal calculation: Evidence from multiple single-patient studies of impaired arithmetic fact retrieval. Brain and Cognition, 17, 154–203. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(91)90074-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selter, C. (2001). Addition and subtraction of three-digit numbers: German elementary children's success, methods, and strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 145–173. doi: 10.1023/A:1014521221809
   Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., Miceli, L., & Girelli, L. (1997). A deficit for arithmetical procedures: Lack of knowledge or lack of monitoring? Cortex, 33, 483–498. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70231-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults’ strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 71–92. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solan, H. A. (1987). The effect of visual-spatial and verbal skills on written and mental arithmetic. Journal of American Optometric Association, 58(2), 88–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Temple, C. M. (1991). Procedural dyscalculia and number fact dyscalculia: Double dissociation in developmental dyscalculia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 155–176. doi:10.1080/02643299108253370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevenot, C., & Castel, C. (2012). Relationship and transfer between mental and written arithmetic. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 286–294. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.617302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevenot, C., Castel, C., Fanget, M., & Fayol, M. (2010). Mental subtraction in high- and lower skilled arithmetic problem solvers: Verbal report versus operand-recognition paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1242–1255. doi:10.1037/a0020447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevenot, C., Fanget, M., & Fayol, M. (2007). Retrieval or non-retrieval strategies in mental arithmetic? An operand-recognition paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1344–1352. doi:10.3758/BF03193606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, I. (1999). Mental calculation strategies for additions and subtractions. Part 1. Mathematics in School, 28, 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). Efficient and flexible strategy use on multi-digit sums: A choice/no-choice study. Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 129–140. doi:10.1080/14794802.2013.797745
   Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., Poletti, C., Dufau, S., & Lemaire, P. (2013). The time course of strategy sequential difficulty effects. An ERP study in arithmetic. Experimental Brain Research, 227, 1–8. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3397-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2007). Whole number concepts and operations. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 557–628). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar