Flexible adjustments of visual selectivity in a Flanker task

References

• Abrahamse, E. L., Duthoo, W., Notebaert, W., & Risko, E. F. (2013). Attention modulation by proportion congruency: The asymmetrical list shifting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1552–1562. doi:10.1037/a0032426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholow, B. D., Pearson, M. A., Dickter, C. L., Sher, K. J., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2005). Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: Beyond errors and response conflict. Psychophysiology, 42, 33–42. doi:10.111/j.1469-8986.2005.00258.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, C., Harris, M. B., Guerrero, J. V., & Bunge, S. A. (2012). Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 268–278. doi:10.1080/17470211003775234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.3.624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16, 106–113. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A., Tang, D., & Chen, X. (2013). Training reveals the sources of Stroop and Flanker interference effects. PLoS ONE, 8, e76580. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J. C., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1523–1532. doi:10.1080/17470210902752096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W. (2012). Conflict adaptation: It is not what you expect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1993–2007. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.676655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 374–380. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The Flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101–118. doi: 10.1080/13506289508401726
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210. doi: 10.1037/h0062827
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatta, T., & Nakatsuka, Z. (1975). H. N. Handedness inventory. In S. Ohno (Ed.), Papers for celebration of the 63th birthday of Prof. Ohnishi (pp. 224–247). Osaka: Osaka City University.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 638–644. doi: 10.3758/BF03196526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., Heller, K., & Egner, T. (2014). Bayesian modeling of flexible cognitive control. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 75–82. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166–174. doi: 10.3758/BF03197535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 126–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattler, U. (2006). Distance and ratio effects in the flanker task are due to different mechanisms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1745–1763. doi:10.1080/17470210500344494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, U., & Awh, E. (2009). The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychological Research, 73, 794–802. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0191-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purmann, S., Badde, S., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Wendt, M. (2011). Adaptation to frequent conflict in the Eriksen flanker task: An ERP study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 50–59. doi:10.1027/0269-8803/a000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 514–523. doi:10.1037/0278-7397.34.3.514
   Google Scholar
• Shedden, J. M., Milliken, B., Watter, S., & Monteiro, S. (2013). Event-related potentials as brain correlates of item specific proportion congruent effects. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1442–1455. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: Horth-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Quesada, M., Funes, M. J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure. Acta Psychologica, 142, 203–210. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2008). Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review, 115, 518–525. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, M., & Luna-Rodriguez, A. (2009). Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: Role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practice and flanker-response contingencies. Experimental Psychology, 56, 206–217. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar