References
- Ackerman, R. (2014). The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1349–1368. doi:10.1037/a0035098
- Buratti, S., Allwood, C. M., & Kleitman, S. (2013). First-and second-order metacognitive judgments of semantic memory reports: The influence of personality traits and cognitive styles. Metacognition and Learning, 8(1), 79–102. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9096-5
- Detterman, D. K., & Daniel, M. H. (1989). Correlations of mental tests with each other and with cognitive variables are highest for low IQ groups. Intelligence, 13(4), 349–359. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(89)80007-8
- Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
- Higham, P. A. (2002). Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited. Memory & Cognition, 30(1), 67–80. doi:10.3758/BF03195266
- Higham, P. A., & Tam, H. (2005). Generation failure: Estimating metacognition in cued recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 595–617. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.015
- Jackson, S. A., & Kleitman, S. (2014). Individual differences in decision-making and confidence: Capturing decision tendencies in a fictitious medical test. Metacognition and Learning, 9(1), 25–49. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9110-y
- Jackson, S. A., Kleitman, S., Stankov, L., & Howie, P. (2015a). Decision pattern analysis as a general framework for studying individual differences in decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/bdm.1887
- Jackson, S. A., Kleitman, S., Stankov, L., & Howie, P. (2015b). Individual differences in decision making depend on cognitive abilities, monitoring and control. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1002/bdm.1939
- Koriat, A. (2012). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119(1), 80–113. doi:10.1037/a0025648
- Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103(3), 490–517. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
- Koriat, A., Nussinson, R., Bless, H., & Shaked, N. (2008). Information-based and experience-based metacognitive judgments: Evidence from subjective confidence. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of memory and metamemory (pp. 117–135). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- van der Loo, M. P. J. (2015). extremevalues: Detect outliers in one-dimensional data (R package version 2.3.1). The Hague: Comprehensive R Archive Network.
- Luna, K., Higham, P. A., & Martín-Luengo, B. (2011). Regulation of memory accuracy with multiple answers: The plurality option. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 17(2), 148–158. doi:10.1037/a0023276
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 338–368. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90266-2
- Pallier, G., Wilkinson, R., Danthiir, V., Kleitman, S., Knezevic, G., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D. (2002). The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgments. The Journal of General Psychology, 129(3), 257–299. doi:10.1080/00221300209602099
- R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
- Redelmeier, D. A., & Shafir, E. (1995). Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(4), 302–305. doi:10.1001/jama.273.4.302 doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520280048038
- Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195–202. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195