A belief in trend reversal requires access to cognitive resources

References

• Altmann, E. M., & Burns, B. D. (2005). Streak biases in decision making: Data and a memory model. Cognitive Systems Research, 6(1), 5–16. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayton, P., & Fischer, I. (2004). The hot hand fallacy and the Gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1369–1378. doi: 10.3758/BF03206327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, G., & Leider, S. (2010). The role of experience in the Gambler’s fallacy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(1), 117–129. doi:10.1002/bdm.676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, T. C., Wilke, A., & Hayden, B. Y. (2014). Hot-hand bias in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40(3), 280–286. doi:10.1037/xan0000033
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Block, R. A., Hancock, P. A., & Zakay, D. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134(3), 330–343. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, B. D., & Corpus, B. (2004). Randomness and inductions from streaks: “Gambler’s fallacy versus “Hot hand”. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(1), 179–184. doi: 10.3758/BF03206480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. A., & Shu, S. B. (2007). The rule of three: How the third event signals the emergence of a streak. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 113–121. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The Gambler’s fallacy and the Hot hand: Empirical data from casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(3), 195–209. doi:10.1007/s11166-005-1153-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt, W. F. M. (1993). Betting on trends: Intuitive forecasts of financial risk and return. International Journal of Forecasting, 9(3), 355–371. doi: 10.1016/0169-2070(93)90030-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Braverman, J., & Salovey, P. (2002). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1103–1116. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dostoyevsky, F. M. (1998). Letters to wife 1866-1874. In Z. Podgórzec (Trans.), Aniele, Stróżu mój … : (Listy do żony) 1866-1874. Z dzieł Fiodora Dostojewskiego. London: Puls.
   Google Scholar
• Dostoyevsky, F. M. (1867/2000). The Gambler (novel). In C. J. Hogarth (Trans.), The Gambler. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2197/2197-h/2197-h.htm
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R., & Konold, C. (1997). Making sense of randomness: Implicit encoding as a basis for judgment. Psychological Review, 104(2), 301–318. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J., Wong-Lin, K., Holmes, P., Simen, P., & Cohen, J. D. (2009). Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time tasks: Decomposition and synthesis of mechanisms. Neural Computation, 21(9), 2407–2436. doi:10.1162/neco.2009.09-08-866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökaydin, D., Navarro, D. J., Ma-Wyatt, A., & Perfors, A. (2016). The structure of sequential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(1), 110–123. doi:10.1037/xge0000106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettel, S. A., Mack, P. B., & McCarthy, G. (2002). Perceiving patterns in random series: Dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5(5), 485–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inquisit. (2012). (Version 4.0.2). Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvik, M. E. (1951). Probability learning and a negative recency effect in the serial anticipation of alternative symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(4), 291–297. doi:10.1037/h0056878
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kareev, Y. (2000). Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations. Psychological Review, 107(2), 397–402. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, N. H. (1972). Sequential effects of serial reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96(1), 32–36. doi:10.1037/h0033464
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, N. H. (1976). Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: Automatic facilitation or subjective expectancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(4), 567–577. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubińska, E., & Markiewicz, Ł. (2008). Analiza decyzji inwestycyjnych uczestników gry giełdowej – skłonności wirtualnych inwestorów, inwestujących wirtualne środki [Analysis of investment decisions taken by participants of the game − susceptibility of virtual investors investing virtual money]. Decyzje, 9, 57–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kubińska, E., & Markiewicz, Ł. (2012). Strategie prognostyczne a preferencja ryzyka u inwestorów giełdowych [Forecasting strategies and propensity towards risk among stock market investors]. Psychologia Ekonomiczna/Polish Journal of Economic Psychology, 1, 40–56. doi:10.14659/PJOEP.2012.01.03
   Google Scholar
• Roney, C. J. R., & Trick, L. M. (2003). Grouping and gambling: A gestalt approach to understanding the gambler’s fallacy. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 57(2), 69–75. doi:10.1037/h0087414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibehenne, B., & Studer, B. (2014). A hierarchical Bayesian model of the influence of run length on sequential predictions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 211–217. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0469-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soetens, E., Boer, L. C., & Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 598–616. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Soetens, E. (1999). Covert signs of expectancy in serial reaction time tasks revealed by event-related potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(2), 342–353. doi:10.3758/BF03206892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundali, J., & Croson, R. (2006). Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the gambler’s fallacy. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyszka, T., & Sawicki, P. (2011). Affective and cognitive factors influencing sensitivity to probabilistic information. Risk Analysis, 31(11), 1832–1845. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01644.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyszka, T., Zielonka, P., Dacey, R., & Sawicki, P. (2008). Perception of randomness and predicting uncertain events. Thinking & Reasoning, 14(1), 83–110. doi:10.1080/13546780701677669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke, A., & Barrett, H. C. (2009). The hot hand phenomenon as a cognitive adaptation to clumped resources. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(3), 161–169. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar