Ignorance reflects preference: the influence of selective ignoring on evaluative conditioning

References

• Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395–419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blask, K., Walther, E., & Frings, C. (2016). When congruence breeds preference: The influence of selective attention processes on evaluative conditioning. Cognition and Emotion. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1197100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blask, K., Walther, E., Halbeisen, G., & Weil, R. (2012). At the crossroads: Attention, contingency awareness, and evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 43, 99−106. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunstrom, J. M., & Higgs, S. (2002). Exploring evaluative conditioning using a working memory task. Learning and Motivation, 33, 433−455. doi: 10.1016/S0023-9690(02)00007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneille, O., Mauduit, S., Holland, R. W., & Strick, M. A. (2009). Liking products by the head of a dog: Perceived orientation of attention induces valence acquisition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 234–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230–241. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600006491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Association learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2010). Goals, attention, and (un)consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 467−490. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2012). Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition, 78, 94–98. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229−238. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A., & Moore, A. (2005). Dissociating the effects of attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 217−243. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C, Wentura, D, & Wühr, P. (2012). On the fate of distractor representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 38, 570–575. doi:10.1037/a0027781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, A., & Rothermund, K. (2011). What you see is what will change: Evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 89–110. doi: 10.1080/02699931003696380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen, C., Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Investigating the interplay of top-down and bottom-up control of behavior: Differences in the strength of inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings. Memory & Cognition, 40, 373–387. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. (2014). Stimulus-response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 376–384. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herwig, A., Prinz, W., & Waszak, F. (2007). Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1540–1554. doi: 10.1080/17470210601119134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Pösse, B., & Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 227–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., De Houwer, J., & Perugini, M. (2016). Expanding the boundaries of evaluative learning research: How intersecting regularities shape our likes and dislikes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 731–754. doi: 10.1037/xge0000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner, R., & Lehle, C. (2007). Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 103–123. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. R., Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2009). Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 933−948. doi: 10.1037/a0014747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattner, F. (2012). Revisiting the relation between contingency awareness and attention: Evaluative conditioning relies on a contingency focus. Cognition & Emotion, 26, 166−175. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.565036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451–468. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183–197. doi: 10.3758/BF03213897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pelley, M. E., Calvini, G., & Spears, R. (2013). Learned predictiveness influences automatic evaluations in human contingency learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 217–228. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.708760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pelley, M. E., Haselgrove, M., & Esber, G. R. (2012). Modeling attention in associative learning: Two processes or one? Learning & Behavior, 40, 292–304. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0084-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehle, C., & Hübner, R. (2008). On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 814–818. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183–198. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014). Long-term response-stimulus associations can influence distractor-response bindings. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 10, 68–80. doi: 10.5709/acp-0158-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12, 9–17. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most, S. B., Smith, S. D., Cooter, A. B., Levy, B. N., & Zald, D. H. (2007). The naked truth: Positive, arousing distractors impair rapid target perception. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 964–981. doi: 10.1080/02699930600959340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postzich, C., Blask, K., Frings, C., & Walther, E. (2016). Timeless: A large sample study on the temporal robustness of affective responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380−391. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object’s attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198–211. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schouppe, N., De Houwer, J., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Notebaert, W. (2012). Conflict: run! Reduced stroop interference with avoidance responses. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1052–1058. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.685080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074. doi: 10.1068/p281059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 37, 571–590. doi: 10.1080/14640748508400920
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treisman, A. M. (1964). Selective attention in man. British Medical Bulletin, 20, 12–16. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, E., Weil, R., & Düsing, J. (2011). The role of evaluative conditioning in attitude formation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 192−196. doi: 10.1177/0963721411408771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Vietze, I. (2008). Location-specific versus hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 135–140. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.1.135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentura, D., Rothermund, K., & Bak, P. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024−1037. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wühr, P., & Frings, C. (2008). A case for inhibition: Visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 116−130. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar