229
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Retrieval from memory and cue complexity both trigger exemplar-based processes in judgmentFootnote*

&
Pages 406-417 | Received 03 Oct 2017, Accepted 19 Feb 2018, Published online: 01 Mar 2018

References

  • Brehmer, B. (1994). The psychology of linear judgement models. Acta Psychologica, 87, 137–154. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(94)90048-5
  • Bröder, A., Gräf, M., & Kieslich, P. J. (2017). Measuring the relative contributions of rule-based and exemplar-based processes in judgment: Validation of a simple model. Judgment and Decision Making, 12, 491–506.
  • Bröder, A., Newell, B. R., & Platzer, C. (2010). Cue integration vs. exemplar-based reasoning in multi-attribute decisions from memory: A matter of cue representation. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 326–338.
  • Brooks, L. R., & Hannah, S. D. (2006). Instantiated features and the use of “rules”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 133–151. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.133
  • Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology.. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217. doi: 10.1037/h0047470
  • Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34(7), 571–582. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.571
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650
  • Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227–247. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.3.227
  • Hahn, U., Prat-Sala, M., Pothos, E. M., & Brumby, D. P. (2010). Exemplar similarity and rule application. Cognition, 114, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.011
  • Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258–268. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258
  • Herzog, S. M., & von Helversen, B. (in press). Strategy selection versus strategy blending: A predictive perspective on single- and multi-strategy accounts in multiple-cue estimation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
  • Hoffmann, J. A., von Helversen, B., & Rieskamp, J. (2014). Pillars of judgment: How memory abilities affect performance in rule-based and exemplar-based judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2242–2261. doi: 10.1037/a0037989
  • Juslin, P., Karlsson, L., & Olsson, H. (2008). Information integration in multiple cue judgment: A division of labor hypothesis. Cognition, 106, 259–298. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.003
  • Juslin, P., Olsson, H., & Olsson, A. C. (2003). Exemplar effects in categorization and multiple-cue judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 133–156. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.133
  • Juslin, P., & Persson, M. (2002). Probabilities from EXemplars (PROBEX): A “lazy” algorithm for probabilistic inference from generic knowledge. Cognitive Science, 26, 563–607. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2605_2
  • Karlsson, L., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2008). Exemplar-based inference in multi-attribute judgment: Contingent not automatic strategy shifts? Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 244–260.
  • Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
  • Newell, B. R., Weston, N. J., Tunney, R. J., & Shanks, D. R. (2009). The effectiveness of feedback in multiple-cue probability learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 890–908. doi: 10.1080/17470210802351411
  • Pachur, T., & Olsson, H. (2012). Type of learning task impacts performance and strategy selection in decision making. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 207–240. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.003
  • Persson, M., & Rieskamp, J. (2009). Inferences from memory: Strategy- and exemplar-based judgment models compared. Acta Psychologica, 130, 25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.010
  • Platzer, C., & Bröder, A. (2013). When the rule is ruled out: Exemplars and rules in decisions from memory. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 429–441. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1776
  • von Helversen, B., Herzog, S. M., & Rieskamp, J. (2014). Haunted by a doppelgänger: Irrelevant facial similarity affects rule-based judgments. Experimental Psychology, 61, 12–22. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000221
  • von Helversen, B., Karlsson, L., Mata, R., & Wilke, A. (2013). Why does cue polarity information provide benefits in inference problems? The role of strategy selection and knowledge of cue importance. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.007

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.