Multiple layers of information processing in deductive reasoning: combining dual strategy and dual-source approaches to reasoning

References

• Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 379–384. doi: 10.3758/BF03192707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. D. (1995). Naive theories and causal deduction. Memory & Cognition, 23(5), 646–658. doi: 10.3758/BF03197265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. D., Lubart, T., Alksnis, O., & Rist, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory & Cognition, 19(3), 274–282. doi: 10.3758/BF03211151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 295–306. doi: 10.3758/BF03196976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B, Thompson, V. A, & Over, D. E. (2015). Uncertain deduction and conditional reasoning. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics and inference. Psychological Review, 109, 646–678. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., Beller, S., & Hutter, M. (2010). Conditional reasoning in context: A dual-source model of probabilistic inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 298–323. doi: 10.1037/a0018705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H. (1984). Awareness of the “possible” as a mediator of formal thinking in conditional reasoning problems. British Journal of Psychology, 75(3), 367–376. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01907.x
   Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., Brisson, J., & de Chantal, P.-L. (2015). Additional evidence for a dual-strategy model of reasoning: Probabilistic reasoning is more invariant than reasoning about logical validity. Memory & Cognition, 43, 1208–1215. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0535-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., Brisson, J., & de Chantal, P.-L. (2016). Logical reasoning versus information processing in the dual-strategy model of reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(1), 72–80. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., Brisson, J., de Chantal, P.-L., & Thompson, V. A. (2017). Interactions between inferential strategies and belief bias. Memory & Cognition, 1–11. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0723-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., Brunet, M.-L., Thompson, V., & Brisson, J. (2013). Direct evidence for a dual process model of deductive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1213–1222. doi: 10.1037/a0030906
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markovits, H., Forgues, H. L., & Brunet, M.-L. (2012). More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 40(5), 736–747. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0186-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., Lortie Forgues, H., & Brunet, M.-L. (2010). Conditional reasoning, frequency of counterexamples, and the effect of response modality. Memory & Cognition, 38(4), 485–492. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.4.485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., Trémolière, B., & Blanchette, I. (in press). Reasoning strategies modulate gender differences in emotion processing. Cognition.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., & Vachon, R. (1990). Conditional reasoning, representation, and level of abstraction. Developmental Psychology, 26(6), 942–951. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2003). Conditional probability and the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Mind & Language, 18(4), 359–379. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, S., & Markovits, H. (1998). Conditional reasoning, causality, and the structure of semantic memory: Strength of association as a predictive factor for content effects. Cognition, 68(3), B93–B101. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00053-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., & Aust, F. (2017). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package version 0.18-0. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=afex
   Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., Klauer, K. C., & Beller, S. (2016). Probabilistic conditional reasoning: Disentangling form and content with the dual-source model. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 61–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., Klauer, K. C., & Over, D. (2014). New normative standards of conditional reasoning and the dual-source model. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 316. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological bulletin, 119(1), 3. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A. (1994). Interpretational factors in conditional reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 742–758. doi: 10.3758/BF03209259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A. (1995). Conditional reasoning: The necessary and sufficient conditions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 49(1), 1–60. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.49.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschueren, N., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005a). A dual-process specification of causal conditional reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(3), 239–278. doi: 10.1080/13546780442000178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschueren, N., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005b). Everyday conditional reasoning: A working memory—dependent tradeoff between counterexample and likelihood use. Memory & Cognition, 33(1), 107–119. doi: 10.3758/BF03195301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar