Can pupillometry index auditory attentional capture in contexts of active visual processing?

References

• Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 403–450. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azman, A., Meng, Q., Edirisinghe, E. A., & Azman, H. (2011). Non-intrusive physiological measurement for driver cognitive distraction detection: Eye and mouth movements. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science, 1, 92–99. doi:10.1109/ICACTE.2010.5579547
   Google Scholar
• Banbury, S., & Berry, D. C. (1998). The disruption of speech and office-related tasks by speech and office noise. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 499–517. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02699.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, R. J. (1990). Scoring criteria for response latency and habituation in the electrodermal research: A study in the context of the orienting response. Psychophysiology, 27, 94–100. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb02185.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 276–292. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., Röer, J. P., Dentale, S., & Buchner, A. (2012). Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1542–1557. doi:10.1037/a0028459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664–1677. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, R., & Coltheart, V. (1996). Effects of irrelevant sounds on phonological coding in reading comprehension and short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49, 398–416. doi: 10.1080/713755630
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brisson, J., Mainville, M., Mailloux, M., Beaulieu, C., Serres, J., & Sirois, S. (2013). Pupil diameter measurement errors as a function of gaze direction in corneal reflection eyetrackers. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1322–1331. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0327-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., Winkler, I., Kujala, T., & Näätänen, R. (2003). The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound: Evidence from token set size effects. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cauchard, F., Cane, J. E., & Weger, U. W. (2012). Influence of background speech and music in interrupted reading: An eye-tracking study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 381–390. doi:10.1002/acp.1837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chein, J. M., & Fiez, J. A. (2010). Evaluating models of working memory through the effects of concurrent irrelevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 117–137. doi:10.1037/a0018200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehais, F., Causse, M., & Pastor, J. (2008). Embedded eye tracker in a real aircraft: New perspectives on pilot/aircraft interaction monitoring. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on research in air transportation (pp. 303–309). Fairfax, VA: Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Dehais, F., Causse, M., & Tremblay, S. (2011). Mitigation of conflicts with automation: Use of cognitive countermeasures. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53, 448–460. doi: 10.1177/0018720811418635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehais, F., Causse, M., Vachon, F., Régis, N., Menant, E., & Tremblay, S. (2014). Failure to detect critical auditory alerts in the cockpit: Evidence for inattentional deafness. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56, 631–644. doi: 10.1177/0018720813510735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehais, F., Tessier, C., & Chaudron, L. (2003). Ghost: Experimenting conflicts countermeasures in the pilot’s activity. In Proceedings of the 18th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 163–168). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology & Neurotology, 5, 151–166. doi:10.1159/000013877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590–604. doi: 10.1162/089892998562997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D., Hakerem, G., Sutton, S., & Fleiss, J. L. (1973). Effect of stimulus uncertainty on the pupillary dilation response and the vertex evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 34, 475–484. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(73)90065-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes, R. W. (2014). Auditory distraction: A duplex-mechanism account. PsyCh Journal, 3, 30–41. doi: 10.1002/pchj.44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Hurlstone, M. J., Marsh, J. E., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2013). Cognitive control of auditory distraction: Impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity support duplex- mechanism account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 539–553. doi:10.1037/a0029064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 736–749. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2007). Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: Support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1050–1061. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Ekholm, M. (2016). Background speech effects on sentence processing during reading: An eye movement study. PLoS ONE, 11, e0152133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbert, J.-P., Hurter, C., Peysakhovich, V., Blätter, C., Dehais, F., & Camachon, C. (2015). Design requirements to integrate eye trackers in simulation environments: Aeronautical use case. In R. Neves-Silva, L. Jain, & R. Howlett (Eds.), Intelligent decision technologies. Smart innovation, systems and technologies (Vol. 39, pp. 231–242). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19857-6_21
   Google Scholar
• Jainta, S., Vernet, M., Yang, Q., & Kapoula, Z. (2011). The pupil reflects motor preparation for saccades—even before the eye starts to move. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, Article 97. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00097
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 369–381. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44, 645–669. doi: 10.1080/14640749208401304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 550–558. doi: 10.3758/BF03214370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154, 1583–1585. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3756.1583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Wright, P. (1971). Evidence for alternative strategies of sentence retention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 187–196. doi:10.1080/14640747108400240 doi: 10.1080/14640747108400239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner, U., Röer, J. P., Buchner, A., & Bell, R. (2017). Working memory capacity is equally unrelated to auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 96, 122–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, E. (2005). Disruption of attention by irrelevant stimuli in serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 513–531. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H.-I., Kidani, S., Yoneya, M., Kashino, M., & Furukawa, S. (2016). Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 412–425. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0898-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H.-I., Yoneya, M., Kidani, S., Kashino, M., & Furukawa, S. (2016). Human pupillary dilation response to deviant auditory stimuli: Effects of stimulus properties and voluntary attention. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 43. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, T. F., & Furedy, J. J. (1979). A comparison of the pupillary and electrodermal components of the orienting reflex in sensitivity for initial stimulus presentation, repetition and change. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 381–391). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marois, A., Labonté, K., Parent, M., & Vachon, F. (2018). Eyes have ears: Indexing the orienting response to sound using pupillometry. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 123, 152–162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2008). Auditory distraction in semantic memory: A process-based approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 682–700. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2009). Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction. Cognition, 110, 23–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Patel, K., Labonté, K., Threadgold, E., Skelton, F. C., Fodarella, C., … Vachon, F. (2017). Chatting in the face of the eyewitness: The impact of extraneous cell-phone conversation on memory for a perpetrator. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 71, 183–190. doi: 10.1037/cep0000101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Roër, J. P., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2014). Predictability and distraction: Does the neural model represent postcategorical features? PsyCh Journal, 3, 58–71. doi: 10.1002/pchj.50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, R. C., Wogalter, M. S., & Forlano, J. G. (1988). Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 382–398. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90063-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Dalmaijer, E., Grainger, J., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2014). The pupillary light response reflects exogenous attention and inhibition of return. Journal of Vision, 14, Article 7. doi: 10.1167/14.14.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., & Ivanov, Y. (2017, November). What’s good about large pupils?Poster session presented at the 2017 psychonomic society annual meeting, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mele, M., & Frederici, S. (2012). Gaze and eye-tracking solutions for psychological research. Cognitive Processing, 13, 261–265. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0499-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller-Grass, A., Macdonald, M., Schröger, E., Sculthorpe, L., & Campbell, K. (2007). Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: Elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention. Brain Research, 1170, 71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. R., Robertson, I. H., Balsters, J. H., & O’Connell, R. G. (2011). Pupillometry and P3 index the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic arousal function in humans. Psychophysiology, 48, 1532–1543. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01226.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201–233. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00078407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 510–532. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, S., De Geus, E. J., & Aston-Jones, G. (2011). The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology, 48, 162–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01057.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nöstl, A., Marsh, J. E., & Sörqvist, P. (2012). Expectations modulate the magnitude of attentional capture by auditory events. PLoS One, 7, e48569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström, M., Hooge, I., & Andersson, R. (2016). Pupil size influences the eye-tracker signal during saccades. Vision Research, 121, 95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, C. J. P., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2000). Disruption of comprehension by the meaning of irrelevant sound. Memory (Hove, England), 8, 345–350. doi: 10.1080/09658210050117762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmentier, F. B. R. (2008). Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition, 109, 345–362. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmentier, F. B. R. (2014). The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: A review. Psychological Research, 78, 321–338. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0534-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmentier, F. B. R., & Hebrero, M. (2013). Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1635–1641. doi: 10.1037/a0032421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peysakhovich, V., Causse, M., Scannella, S., & Dehais, F. (2015). Frequency analysis of a task-evoked pupillary response: Luminance-independent measure of mental effort. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 97, 30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peysakhovich, V., Lefrançois, O., Dehais, F., & Causse, M. (2018). The neuroergonomics of aircraft cockpits: The four stages of eye-tracking integration to enhance flight safety. Safety, 4, 8. doi: 10.3390/safety4010008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peysakhovich, V., Vachon, F., & Dehais, F. (2017). The impact of luminance on tonic and phasic pupillary responses to sustained cognitive load. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 112, 40–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128–2148. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiyuan, J., Richer, F., Wagoner, B. L., & Beatty, J. (1985). The pupil and stimulus probability. Psychophysiology, 22, 530–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01645.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison, M. K., & Unsworth, N. (2015). Working memory capacity offers resistance to mind-wandering and external distraction in a context specific manner. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 680–690. doi: 10.1002/acp.3150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röer, J. P., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2014). What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations. PLoS One, 9, e84166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushby, J. A., Barry, R. J., & Doherty, R. J. (2005). Separation of the components of the late positive complex in an ERP dishabituation paradigm. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2363–2380. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sara, S. J., & Bouret, S. (2012). Orienting and reorienting: The locus coeruleus mediates cognition through arousal. Neuron, 76, 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.011 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02395.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71–87. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00013-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simons, R. F., Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., Fiorito, E., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1987). Evocation and habituation of autonomic and event-related potential responses in a nonsignal environment. Journal of Psychophysiology, 1(1), 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P. (2010). High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: Further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Memory & Cognition, 38, 651–658. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.5.651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Dahlström, Ö, Karlsson, T., & Rönnberg, J. (2016). Concentration: The neural underpinnings of how cognitive load shields against distraction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 552. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Halin, N., & Hygge, S. (2010). Individual differences in susceptibility to the effects of speech on reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 67–76. doi: 10.1002/acp.1543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., & Marsh, J. E. (2015). How concentration shields against distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 267–272. doi: 10.1177/0963721415577356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Stenfelt, S., & Rönnberg, J. (2012). Working memory capacity and cognitive load modulate auditory-sensory gating in the brainstem: Toward a unified view of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 2147–2154. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, G. Z., & Barry, R. J. (2011). Pupillary responses and event-related potentials as indices of the orienting reflex. Psychophysiology, 48, 1648–1655. doi:10.1111/j.1469- 8986.2011.01271.x doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01271.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, G. Z., & Barry, R. J. (2014). The mechanism of dishabituation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8, 14. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sussman, E. S., Chen, S., Sussman-Fort, J., & Dinces, E. (2014). The five myths of MMN: Redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research. Brain Topography, 27, 553–564. doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0326-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryon, W. (1975). Pupillometry: A survey of sources of variation. Psychophysiology, 12, 90–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03068.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., & Robison, M. K. (2015). Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 757–765. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0747-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., & Robison, M. K. (2017). The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1962–1987. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon, F., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2012). Broken expectations: Violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 164–177. doi: 10.1037/a0025054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon, F., Labonté, K., & Marsh, J. E. (2017). Attentional capture by deviant sounds: A general form of distraction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 622–634. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon, F., Marois, A., Lévesque-Dion, M., Legendre, M., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2018). Can hebb be distracted? Testing the susceptibility of sequence learning to auditory distraction. Journal of Cognition, 2, 1–16. doi: 10.5334/joc.8
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-A., & Munoz, D. P. (2015). A circuit for pupil orienting responses: Implications for cognitive modulation of pupil size. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 33, 134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel, N., Buttelmann, D., Schieler, A., & Widmann, A. (2016). Infant and adult pupil dilation in response to unexpected sounds. Developmental Psychobiology, 58, 382–392. doi: 10.1002/dev.21377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., & Alexander, A. L. (2009). Attentional tunneling and task management in synthetic vision displays. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 19, 182–199. doi: 10.1080/10508410902766549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I. (2009). Modeling the auditory scene: Predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 532–540. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, B., Whitaker, D., Elliot, D. B., & Phillips, N. J. (1994). Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 35(3), 1132–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar