References
- Ansorge, U., Gozli, D. G., & Goller, F. (2019). Investigating the contribution of task and response repetitions to the sequential modulations of attentional cueing effects. Psychological Research, 83(6), 1251–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0950-y
- Bennetts, R. J., & Pratt, J. (2001). The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 12(1), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00313
- Braem, S., Abrahamse, E. L., Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W. (2014). What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01134
- Chica, A. B., Martin-Arevalo, E., Botta, F., & Lupianez, J. (2014). The spatial orienting paradigm: How to design and interpret spatial attention experiments. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 40, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.002
- Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2007). The effect of previous trial type on inhibition of return. Psychological Research, 71(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0028-0
- Egner, T. (2017). Conflict Adaptation: Past, present, and future of the congruency sequence effect as an index of cognitive control. In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive control (pp. 64–78). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Friesen, C. K., Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(2), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.319
- Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
- Gomez, C. M., Flores, A., Digiacomo, M. R., & Vazquez-Marrufo, M. (2009). Sequential P3 effects in a Posner's spatial cueing paradigm: Trial-by-trial learning of the predictive value of the cue. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 69(2), 155–167.
- Gozli, D. (2019). What is a task? In D. Gozli (Ed.), Experimental psychology and human agency (pp. 83–111). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20422-8_5.
- He, C., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383(6598), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/383334a0.
- Henderson, J. M., & Macquistan, A. D. (1993). The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue. Perception and Psychophysics, 53(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211732
- Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the simon task. Psychological Research, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
- Jongen, E. M., & Smulders, F. T. (2007). Sequence effects in a spatial cueing task: Endogenous orienting is sensitive to orienting in the preceding trial. Psychological Research, 71(5), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0065-3
- Kim, S., & Cho, Y. S. (2014). Congruency sequence effect without feature integration and contingency learning. Acta Psychologica, 149, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.03.004.
- Kingstone, A., Friesen, C. K., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). Reflexive joint attention depends on lateralized cortical connections. Psychological Science, 11(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00232
- Langton, S. R., & Bruce, V. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6(5), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062899394939
- Lim, C. E., & Cho, Y. S. (2018). Determining the scope of control underlying the congruency sequence effect: Roles of stimulus-response mapping and response mode. Acta Psychologica, 190, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.08.012.
- Mordkoff, J. T., Halterman, R., & Chen, P. (2008). Why does the effect of short-SOA exogenous cuing on simple RT depend on the number of display locations? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.819
- Qian, Q., Shinomori, K., & Song, M. (2012). Sequence effects by non-predictive arrow cues. Psychological Research, 76(3), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0339-2
- Qian, Q., Wang, F., Feng, Y., & Song, M. (2015). Spatial organisation between targets and cues affects the sequence effect of symbolic cueing. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(07), 855–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1048249
- Qian, Q., Wang, F., Song, M., Feng, Y., & Shinomori, K. (2017). Spatial correspondence learning is critical for the sequence effects of symbolic cueing. Japanese Psychological Research, 59(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12148
- Qian, Q., Wang, F., Song, M., Feng, Y., & Shinomori, K. (2018). Sequence effects of the involuntary and the voluntary components of symbolic cueing. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 80(3), 662–668. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1472-9
- Qian, Q., Wang, X., Song, M., & Wang, F. (2017). Gazes induce similar sequential effects as arrows in a target discrimination task [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Intelligence Science.
- Schumacher, E. H., & Hazeltine, E. (2016). Hierarchical task representation: Task files and response selection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416665085
- Shin, M.-J., Marrett, N., & Lambert, A. J. (2011). Visual orienting in response to attentional cues: Spatial correspondence is critical, conscious awareness is not. Visual Cognition, 19(6), 730–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2011.582053
- Tipples, J. (2008). Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.1.77
- Weissman, D. H., Colter, K., Drake, B., & Morgan, C. (2015). The congruency sequence effect transfers across different response modes. Acta Psychologica, 161, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.08.010
- Wolfe, J. M. (2020). Forty years after feature integration theory: An introduction to the special issue in honor of the contributions of Anne Treisman. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 82(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01966-3.