References
- Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0–6.
- Becker, M., Sommer, T., & Kühn, S. (2020a). Inferior frontal gyrus involvement during search and solution in verbal creative problem solving: A parametric fMRI study. NeuroImage, 206, Article 116294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116294
- Becker, M., Sommer, T., & Kühn, S. (2020b). Verbal insight revisited: fMRI evidence for early processing in bilateral insulae for solutions with AHA! experience shortly after trial onset. Human Brain Mapping, 41(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24785
- Becker, M., Wiedemann, G., & Kühn, S. (2018). Quantifying insightful problem solving: A modified compound remote associates paradigm using lexical priming to parametrically modulate different sources of task difficulty. Psychological Research, 84, 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1042-3
- Biemann, C., Heyer, G., Quasthoff, U., & Richter, M. (2007, 27–30 July). The Leipzig Corpora collection: Monolingual corpora of standard size. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistic 2007, Birmingham.
- Bilalić, M., Graf, M., Vaci, N., & Danek, A. H. (2019). When the solution is on the doorstep: Better solving performance, but diminished Aha! experience for chess experts on the mutilated checkerboard problem. Cognitive Science, 43(8), Article e12771. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12771
- Bindemann, M. (2010). Scene and screen center bias early eye movements in scene viewing. Vision Research, 50(23), 2577–2587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.016
- Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(12), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003
- Bowden, E. M. (1997). The effect of reportable and unreportable hints on anagram solution and the Aha! experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 6(4), 545–573. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1997.0325
- Bowden, E. M., & Beeman, M. J. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems. Psychological Science, 9(6), 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00082
- Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195543
- Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). Methods for investigating the neural components of insight. Methods, 42(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.11.007
- Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J., & Kounios, J. (2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.012
- Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 72–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-N
- Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., & Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 602–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x
- Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
- Danek, A. H. (2018). Magic tricks, sudden restructuring, and the Aha! experience: A new model of nonmonotonic problem solving. In Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight (pp. 51–78). Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315268118
- Danek, A. H., Fraps, T., von Müller, A., Grothe, B., & Öllinger, M. (2014). Working wonders? investigating insight with magic tricks. Cognition, 130(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.003
- Danek, A. H., & Wiley, J. (2017). What about false insights? Deconstructing the Aha! experience along its multiple dimensions for correct and incorrect solutions separately. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02077
- Danek, A. H., Wiley, J., & Öllinger, M. (2016). Solving classical insight problems without aha! experience: 9 dot, 8 coin, and matchstick arithmetic problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 9(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1183
- Danek, A. H., Williams, J., & Wiley, J. (2020). Closing the gap: Connecting sudden representational change to the subjective Aha! experience in insightful problem solving. Psychological Research, 84(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0977-8
- Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019749
- Duncker, K., & Lees, L. S. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 68(5). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599
- Evans, A. C., Collins, D. L., Mills, S. R., Brown, E. D., Kelly, R. L., & Peters, T. M. (1993, 31 October–6 November). 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, 1993 IEEE Conference Record, IEEE.
- Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.392
- Goel, V. (2014). Creative brains: Designing in the real world. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(241), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00241
- Hélie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117(3), 994–1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019532
- Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., Reber, P. J., & Kounios, J. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2(4), e97. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020097
- Kafkas, A., & Montaldi, D. (2012). Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched. Neuropsychologia, 50(13), 3080–3093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.001
- Kajić, I., Gosmann, J., Stewart, T. C., Wennekers, T., & Eliasmith, C. (2017). A spiking neuron model of word associations for the remote associates test. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00099
- Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 374–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90008-R
- Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303(5660), 1023–1026. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089910
- Kizilirmak, J. M., Schott, B. H., Thuerich, H., Sweeney-Reed, C. M., Richter, A., Folta-Schoofs, K., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2019). Learning of novel semantic relationships via sudden comprehension is associated with a hippocampus-independent network. Consciousness and Cognition, 69, 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.005
- Kizilirmak, J. M., Thuerich, H., Folta-Schoofs, K., Schott, B. H., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2016). Neural correlates of learning from induced insight: A case for reward-based episodic encoding. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01693
- Kloosterman, N. A., Meindertsma, T., van Loon, A. M., Lamme, V. A., Bonneh, Y. S., & Donner, T. H. (2015). Pupil size tracks perceptual content and surprise. European Journal of Neuroscience, 41(8), 1068–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12859
- Knapen, T., de Gee, J. W., Brascamp, J., Nuiten, S., Hoppenbrouwers, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2016). Cognitive and ocular factors jointly determine pupil responses under equiluminance. PloS one, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155574
- Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1534–1555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1534
- Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154
- Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963
- Levy, O., & Goldberg, Y. (2014a, June). Dependency-based word embeddings. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 302–308). ACL, Baltimore.
- Levy, O., & Goldberg, Y. (2014b, June). Linguistic regularities in sparse and explicit word representations. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, ACL, Baltimore.
- Lieberman, M. D., & Cunningham, W. A. (2009). Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: Re-balancing the scale. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(4), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp052
- Ludmer, R., Dudai, Y., & Rubin, N. (2011). Uncovering camouflage: Amygdala activation predicts long-term memory of induced perceptual insight. Neuron, 69(5), 1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.013
- Luo, J., Niki, K., & Phillips, S. (2004b). The function of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in the insightful solving of puzzles: The ACC is activated less when the structure of the puzzle is known. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 5(2), 195–213.
- Maier, N. R. (1931). Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071361
- Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Bayestestr: Describing effects and their uncertainty, existence and significance within the Bayesian framework. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(40), 1541. 10.21105/joss.01541
- Millar, R. B. (2011). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference: With examples in R, SAS and ADMB (Vol. 111). John Wiley.
- Norman, G. R., Sloan, J. A., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care, 41(5), 582–592. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C
- Ohlsson, S. (1984). Restructuring revisited: II. An information processing theory of restructuring and insight. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 25(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1984.tb01005.x
- Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M. Keane & K. J. Gilhooly (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking (pp. 1–44). Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
- Öllinger, M., Jones, G., Faber, A. H., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Cognitive mechanisms of insight: The role of heuristics and representational change in solving the eight-coin problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 931–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029194
- Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2014). The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the nine-dot problem. Psychological Research, 78(2), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0494-8
- Olteţeanu, A. M., & Falomir, Z. (2015). comRAT-C: A computational compound remote associates test solver based on language data and its comparison to human performance. Pattern Recognition Letters, 67, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2015.05.015
- Otero, S. C., Weekes, B. S., & Hutton, S. B. (2011). Pupil size changes during recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 48(10), 1346–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01217.x
- Partala, T., & Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1-2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00017-X
- Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J., & Rogers, T. T. (2007). Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(12), 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2277
- Preuschoff, K., tHart, B. M., & Einhauser, W. (2011). Pupil dilation signals surprise: Evidence for noradrenaline’s role in decision making. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, 115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00115
- R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (p. 2014). R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Renner, L. F., & Wlodarczak, M. (2017, August 20–24). When a dog is a cat and how it changes your pupil size: Pupil dilation in response to information mismatch. In Interspeech (pp. 674–678), Stockholm, Sweden.
- Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E., & Beeman, M. (2016). Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(4), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2016.1141798
- Salvi, C., Simoncini, C., Grafman, J., & Beeman, M. (2020). Oculometric signature of switch into awareness? Pupil size predicts sudden insight whereas microsaccades problem-solving via analysis. NeuroImage, 116933.
- Schunn, C. D., & Dunbar, K. (1996). Priming, analogy, and awareness in complex reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 24(3), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213292
- Sprugnoli, G., Rossi, S., Emmendorfer, A., Rossi, A., Liew, S.-L., Tatti, E., di Lorenzo, G., Pascual-Leone, A., & Santarnecchi, E. (2017). Neural correlates of Eureka moment. Intelligence, 62, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.03.004
- SR RESEARCH. (2007). Eyelink user manual. Version 1.3.0 [Computer software manual].
- Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1995). The nature of insight. MIT Press.
- Subramaniam, K., Kounios, J., Parrish, T. B., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2009). A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21057
- Tang, X., Pang, J., Nie, Q. Y., Conci, M., Luo, J., & Luo, J. (2015). Probing the cognitive mechanism of mental representational change during chunk decomposition: A parametric fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 26(7), 2991–2999. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv113
- Thevenot, C., & Oakhill, J. (2008). A generalization of the representational change theory from insight to non-insight problems: The case of arithmetic word problems. Acta Psychologica, 129, 315–324.
- Tik, M., Sladky, R., Di Bernardi Luft, C., Willinger, D., Hoffmann, A., Banissy, M. J., Bhattacharya, J., & Windischberger, C. (2018). Ultra-high-field fMRI insights on insight: Neural correlates of the Aha!-moment. Human Brain Mapping, 39(8), 3241–3252. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24073
- Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining insight into the “Aha” experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 402–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388803
- Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage, 15(1), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0978
- Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., & Cropper, S. J. (2016). Insight is not in the problem: Investigating insight in problem solving across task types. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1424. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01424
- Wu, L., Knoblich, G., & Luo, J. (2013). The role of chunk tightness and chunk familiarity in problem solving: Evidence from ERPs and fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 34(5), 1173–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21501
- Zhao, Q., Zhou, Z., Xu, H., Chen, S., Xu, F., Fan, W., & Han, L. (2013). Dynamic neural network of insight: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study on solving Chinese “chengyu” riddles. PloS one, 8(3), e59351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059351