Salience effects in memory-based decisions: an improved replication

References

• Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using LME4. Journal of Statistical Software, 1(1), https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Google Scholar
• Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1978.4305717
   Google Scholar
• Bröder, A. (2000). Assessing the empirical validity of the „take-the-best“ heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1332–1346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1332
   Google Scholar
• Bröder, A. (2003). Decision making with the „adaptive toolbox“: Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(4), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.611
   Google Scholar
• Bröder, A. (2010). Outcome-based strategy classification. In A. Glöckner, & C. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 61–82). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bröder, A., & Gaissmaier, W. (2007). Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multiattribute decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 895–900. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194118
   Google Scholar
• Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003). Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.277
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. (2017). The seven deadly sins of psychology: A manifesto for reforming the culture of scientific practice. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   Google Scholar
• Frank, M. C., & Saxe, R. (2012). Teaching replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 600–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460686
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd and the ABC Reserach Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 3–34). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 3–34). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34(5), 1055–1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1055
   Google Scholar
• Greve, W., Bröder, A., & Erdfelder, E. (2013). Result-blind peer reviews and editorial decisions. A missing pillar of scientific culture. European Psychologist, 18(4), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000144
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258
   Google Scholar
• Heck, D. W., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2017). From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing psychologically plausible choice models. Cognitive Psychology, 96, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2014). Generalized outcome-based strategy classification: Comparing deterministic and probabilistic choice models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1431–1443. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0643-0
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1985). Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science, 31(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.4.395
   Google Scholar
• Khader, P. H., Pachur, T., Meier, S., Bien, S., Jost, K., & Rösler, F. (2011). Memory-based decision-making with heuristics: Evidence for a controlled activation of memory representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3540–3554. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00059
   Google Scholar
• Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Google Scholar
• Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie du Sert, N., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
   Google Scholar
• Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing „one-reason“ decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.53
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
   Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 657–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462588
   Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
   Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Platzer, C., & Bröder, A. (2012). Most people do not ignore salient invalid cues in memory-based decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 654–661. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0248-4
   Google Scholar
• Platzer, C., Bröder, A., & Heck, D. W. (2014). Deciding with the eye: How the visually manipulated accessibility of information in memory influences decision behavior. Memory & Cognition, 42(4), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0380-z
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Santangelo, V. (2015). Forced to remember: When memory is biased by salient information. Behavioural Brain Research, 283, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.013
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
   Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., Holcombe, A. O., & Spellman, B. A. (2014). An introduction to registered replication reports at perspectives on psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 552–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614543974
   Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630
   Google Scholar
• Wassermann, L. (2000). Bayesian model selection and model averaging. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 92–107.
   Google Scholar