The categorical relational process mechanism in enactment learning: effects of divided attention and categorical cues

References

• Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1985). Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance. Experimental Aging Research, 11(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610738508259282
   Google Scholar
• Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1991). Effects of divided attention on free and cued recall of verbal events and action events. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334767
   Google Scholar
• Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L.-G., & Chalom, D. (1986). New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events. Memory & Cognition, 14(4), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202512
   Google Scholar
• Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L. G., Herlitz, A., Nyberg, L., & Stigsdotter, A. (1991). Decomposing the encoding of action events: A dual conception. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 32(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1991.tb00880.x
   Google Scholar
• Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L.-G., & Kormi-Nouri, R. (1993). Attentional demands and recall of verbal and color information in action events. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34(3), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1993.tb01119.x
   Google Scholar
• Badinlou, F., Kormi-Nouri, R., Mousavi Nasab, S. M., & Knopf, M. (2017). Developmental differences in episodic memory across school ages: Evidence from enacted events performed by self and others. Memory, 25(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1126607
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22(1), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1981.tb00402.x
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events. Memory and Cognition, 11(6), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198282
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. L. (1985). On the generality of the laws of memory. In L.-G. Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.), Series in comparative cognition and neuroscience. Perspectives on learning and memory (pp. 247–277). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. L., & Bean, G. (1983). Memory in educable mentally retarded adults: Deficit in subject or experimenter? Intelligence, 7(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(83)90019-3
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. L., & Bryant, S. (1991). The role of duration in memory and metamemory of enacted instructions (SPTs). Psychological Research, 53(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00941385
   Google Scholar
• Daprati, E., Nico, D., Saimpont, A., Franck, N., & Sirigu, A. (2005). Memory and action: An experimental study on normal subjects and schizophrenic patients. Neuropsychologia, 43(2), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.014
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, K., & Post, L. (2015). Mechanisms of embodiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01525
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Memory and action. In L. A. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 296–305). Taylor & Francis Books.
   Google Scholar
• Earles, J. L., & Kersten, A. W. (2002). Directed forgetting of actions by younger and older adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 383–388. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196297
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for actions. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J., & Dehn, D. M. (2000). Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.671
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J., & Seiler, K. H. (2003). Gains and losses in action memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56(5), 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000648
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J., Seiler, K. H., & Zimmer, H. D. (2004). Memory for actions: Item and relational information in categorized lists. Psychological Research, 69(1–2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0160-7
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J., Seiler, K. H., & Zimmer, H. D. (2005). Differential relational encoding of categorical information in memory for action events. Memory & Cognition, 33(3), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193055
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory. German Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 239–254.
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1996). Organisation and recall in verbal tasks and in subject-performed tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/095414496383086
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks. Acta Psychologica, 96(1–2), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00005-X
   Google Scholar
• Fischler, I., & Goodman, G. O. (1978). Latency of associative activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(3), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.455
   Google Scholar
• Golly-Häring, C., & Engelkamp, J. (2003). Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 965–975. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.965
   Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 356–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.356
   Google Scholar
• Helstrup, T. (1987). One, two, or three memories? A problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts. Acta Psychologica, 66(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(87)90017-5
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, S. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2004). Memory for actions: Enactment and source memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196584
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90138-9
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R., & Seta, C. E. (1984). Category size effects in recall: The roles of relational and individual item information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(3), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.3.454
   Google Scholar
• Ianì, F. (2019). Embodied memories: Reviewing the role of the body in memory processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(6), 1747–1766. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01674-x
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, T., Bäckman, L., Herlitz, A., Nilsson, L.-G., Winblad, B., & Osterlind, P.-O. (1989). Memory improvement at different stages of Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 27(5), 737–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(89)90119-X
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, M., Mack, W., Lenel, A., & Ferrante, S. (2005). Memory for action events: Findings in neurological patients. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00430.x
   Google Scholar
• Kormi-Nouri, R. (1995). The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449508403103
   Google Scholar
• Kormi-Nouri, R., Moniri, S., & Nilsson, L.-G. (2003). Episodic and semantic memory in bilingual and monolingual children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00320
   Google Scholar
• Kormi-Nouri, R., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1999). Negative cueing effects with weak and strong intralist cues. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752314
   Google Scholar
• Kormi-Nouri, R., Nilsson, L.-G., & Bäckman, L. (1994). The dual-conception view reexamined: Attentional demands and the encoding of verbal and physical information in action events. Psychological Research, 57(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00452994
   Google Scholar
• Kormi-Nouri, R., Shojaei, R.-S., Moniri, S., Gholami, A.-R., Moradi, A.-R., Akbari-Zardkhaneh, S., & Nilsson, L.-G. (2008). The effect of childhood bilingualism on episodic and semantic memory tasks. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00633.x
   Google Scholar
• Li, G., Wang, L., & Han, Y. (2017). Directed forgetting of negative performed actions is difficult: A behavioural study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1120331
   Google Scholar
• Macedonia, M., & Knösche, T. R. (2011). Body in mind: How gestures empower foreign language learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(4), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01129.x
   Google Scholar
• Masumoto, K., Takai, T., Tsuneto, S., & Kashiwagi, T. (2004). Influence of motoric encoding on forgetting function of memory for action sentences in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98(1), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.98.1.299-306
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031564
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, G., Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Recall and recognition of self-performed acts. Psychological Research, 51(4), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309146
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, N. W. (1999). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: Investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.54
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. D. (1979). Measurement of category clustering in free recall. In C. R. Puff (Ed.), Memory organization and structure (pp. 51–83). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naveh-Benjamin, M., Guez, J., & Marom, M. (2003). The effects of divided attention at encoding on item and associative memory. Memory & Cognition, 31(7), 1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196123
   Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106(3), 226–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226
   Google Scholar
• Saltz, E., & Donnenwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(30), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90472-2
   Google Scholar
• Schult, J., von Stülpnagel, R., & Steffens, M. C. (2014). Enactment versus observation: item-specific and relational processing in goal-directed action sequences (and lists of single actions). PLoS ONE, 9(6), e99985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099985
   Google Scholar
• Steffens, M. C. (2007). Memory for goal-directed sequences of actions: Is doing better than seeing? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193112
   Google Scholar
• Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (2009). Decomposing the memory processes contributing to enactment effects by multinomial modelling. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701868668
   Google Scholar
• Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., Mecklenbräuker, S., & Thompson, E. M. (2006). Decomposing retrieval and integration in memory for actions: A multinomial modeling approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(3), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000764
   Google Scholar
• Steffens, M. C., von Stülpnagel, R., & Schult, J. C. (2015). Memory recall after “learning by doing” and “learning by viewing”: Boundary conditions of an enactment benefit. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1907. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01907
   Google Scholar
• von Essen, J. D. (2005). Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(4), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00461.x
   Google Scholar
• von Stülpnagel, R., Schult, J. C., Richter, C., & Steffens, M. C. (2016). Cognitive costs of encoding novel natural activities: Can “learning by doing” be distracting and deceptive? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 69(8), 1545–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1087581.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, H. D. (1991). Memory after motoric encoding in a generation-recognition model. Psychological Research, 53(3), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00941391
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, H. D. (2001). Why do actions speak louder than words. Action memory as a variant of encoding manipulations or the result of a specific memory system? In H. D. Zimmer, R. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 151–198). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1989). Does motor encoding enhance relational information? Psychological Research, 51(4), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309143
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1999). Levels-of-processing effects in subject-performed tasks. Memory & Cognition, 27(5), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198543
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, H. D., Helstrup, T., & Engelkamp, J. (2000). Pop-out into memory: A retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.658
   Google Scholar