Working memory contributes to word stress processing in a fixed-stress language

References

• Ahveninen, J., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Pekkonen, E., Hallberg, A., Hietanen, M., Mäkelä, R., Näätänen, R., & Sillanaukee, P. (1999). Suppression of mismatch negativity by backward masking predicts impaired working-memory performance in alcoholics. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 23(9), 1507–1514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1999.tb04674.x
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M. W., & Anderson, M. C. (2009). Memory. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, K., Baldeweg, T., Sivagnanasundaram, S., Scambler, P., & Skuse, D. (2005). COMT val108/158Met modifies mismatch negativity and cognitive function in 22q11 deletion syndrome. Biological Psychiatry, 58(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.03.020
   Google Scholar
• Bonetti, L., Haumann, N. T., Brattico, E., Kliuchko, M., Vuust, P., Särkämö, T., & Näätänen, R. (2018). Auditory sensory memory and working memory skills: Association between frontal MMN and performance scores. Brain Research, 1700, 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.06.034
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. A. (2015). A theory of attentional modulations of the supratemporal generation of the auditory mismatch negativity (MMN). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01065
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. A., & Marsh, J. E. (2018). Commentary: Donepezil enhances understanding of degraded speech in Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 10, 197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00197
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. A., & Marsh, J. E. (2019). On corticopetal-corticofugal loops of the new early filter: From cell assemblies to the rostral brainstem. Neuroreport, 30(3), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001184
   Google Scholar
• Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33(3), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(82)90054-6
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. M., Morgan, A. M., Vaughn, M., Riccio, C. A., & Hall, J. (1999). Verbal fluency in children: Developmental issues and differential validity in distinguishing children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and two subtypes ofdyslexia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14, 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/14.5.433
   Google Scholar
• Collette, F., Van Der Linden, M., & Poncelet, M. (2000). Working memory, long-term memory, and language processing: Issues and future directions. Brain and Language, 71(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2209
   Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M., Zach, F., Wilhelm, H. D., & Engle, O., & W, R. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllalbes in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(I), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113
   Google Scholar
• Domahs, U., Knaus, J., El Shanawany, H., & Wiese, R. (2014). The role of predictability and structure in word stress processing: An ERP study on cairene arabic and a cross-linguistic comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01151
   Google Scholar
• Erlbeck, H., Kübler, A., Kotchoubey, B., & Veser, S. (2014). Task instructions modulate the attentional mode affecting the auditory MMN and the semantic N400. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00654
   Google Scholar
• Ettenhofer, M. L., Hambrick, D. Z., & Abeles, N. (2006). Reliability and stability of executive functioning in older adults. Neuropsychology, 20(5), 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.20.5.607
   Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Schul, R. (2010). Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language, 115(3), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., de Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3920133
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: And sex and drugs and rock “N” roll (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fónagy, I. (1958). A hangsúlyról (On stress). Nyelvtudományi Értekezések, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Friston K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 360(1456), 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
   Google Scholar
• Garami, L., Ragó, A., Honbolygó, F., & Csépe, V. (2017). Lexical influence on stress processing in a fixed-stress language. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 117, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Higuchi, Y., Sumiyoshi, T., Seo, T., Miyanishi, T., Kawasaki, Y., & Suzuki, M. (2013). Mismatch negativity and cognitive performance for the prediction of psychosis in subjects with st-risk mental state. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e54080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054080
   Google Scholar
• Honbolygó, F., & Csépe, V. (2013). Saliency or template? ERP evidence for long-term representation of word stress. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Honbolygó, F., Csépe, V., & Ragó, A. (2004). Suprasegmental speech cues are automatically processed by the human brain: A mismatch negativity study. Neuroscience Letters, 363(1), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.03.057
   Google Scholar
• Honbolygó, F., Kóbor, A., German, B., & Csépe, V. (2020). Word stress representations are language-specific: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 57(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13541
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Hurlstone, M. J., Marsh, J. E., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2013). Cognitive control of auditory distraction: Impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029064
   Google Scholar
• Javitt, D. C., Doneshka, P., Grochowski, S., & Ritter, W. (1995). Impaired mismatch negativity generation reflects widespread dysfunction of working memory in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52(7), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950190032005
   Google Scholar
• Kärgel, C., Sartory, G., Kariofillis, D., Wiltfang, J., & Müller, B. W. (2014). Mismatch negativity latency and cognitive function in schizophrenia. PLoS ONE, 9(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084536
   Google Scholar
• Kóbor, A., Horváth, K., Kardos, Z., Takács, Á, Janacsek, K., Csépe, V., & Nemeth, D. (2019). Tracking the implicit acquisition of nonadjacent transitional probabilities by ERPs. Memory and Cognition, 47(8), 1546–1566. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00949-x
   Google Scholar
• Kóbor, A., Takács, Á, Kardos, Z., Janacsek, K., Horváth, K., Csépe, V., & Nemeth, D. (2018). ERPs differentiate the sensitivity to statistical probabilities and the learning of sequential structures during procedural learning. Biological Psychology, 135, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, T., Kottlow, M., Stein, M., & Melie-García, L. (2011). Ragu: A free tool for the analysis of EEG and MEG event-related scalp field data using global randomization statistics. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/938925
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., & Campbell, T. A. (2016). Processing complex sounds passing through the rostral brainstem: The new early filter model. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00136
   Google Scholar
• Mészáros, A., Kónya, A., & Kas, R. (2011). Methods in the administration and evaluation of verbal fluency tests (A verbális fluenciatesztek felvételének és értékelésének módszertana). Almalmazott Pszichológia, 2, 53–76.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, a. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
   Google Scholar
• Miyanishi, T., Sumiyoshi, T., Higuchi, Y., Seo, T., & Suzuki, M. (2013). LORETA current source density for duration mismatch negativity and neuropsychological assessment in early schizophrenia. PLoS ONE, 8(4), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061152
   Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42(4), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(78)90006-9
   Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Kujala, T., Kreegipuu, K., Carlson, S., Escera, C., Baldeweg, T., & Ponton, C. (2011). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Brain, 134(12), 3432–3450. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr064
   Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Lehtokoskl, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., Vainio, M., Alku, P., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Luuk, A., & Alho, K. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385(6615), 432–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/385432a0
   Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(12), 2544–2590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026
   Google Scholar
• Pernet, C., Wilcox, R., & Rousselet, G.. (2013). Robust correlation analyses: False positive and power validation using a new open source Matlab toolbox. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00606
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., Dahlström, Ö, Signoret, C., Stenfelt, S., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Rudner, M. (2013). The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031
   Google Scholar
• Shao, Z., Janse, E., Visser, K., & Meyer, A. S. (2014). What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 772. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00772
   Google Scholar
• Strömmer, J. M., Põldver, N., Waselius, T., Kirjavainen, V., Järveläinen, S., Björksten, S., Tarkka, I. M., & Astikainen, P. (2017). Automatic auditory and somatosensory brain responses in relation to cognitive abilities and physical fitness in older adults. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 13699. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14139-9
   Google Scholar
• Takács, Á, Kóbor, A., Tárnok, Z., & Csépe, V. (2014). Verbal fluency in children with ADHD: Strategy using and temporal properties. Child Neuropsychology, 20(4), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2013.799645
   Google Scholar
• Varga, L. (2002). Intonation and stress: Evidence from Hungarian. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Virag, M., Janacsek, K., Horvath, A., Bujdoso, Z., Fabo, D., & Nemeth, D. (2015). Competition between frontal lobe functions and implicit sequence learning: Evidence from the long-term effects of alcohol. Experimental Brain Research, 233(7), 2081–2089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4279-8
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D. R., Titterington, J., Henry, A., & Toner, J. G. (2007). Auditory sensory memory and working memory processes in children with normal hearing and cochlear implants. Audiology and Neurotology, 12(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1159/000097793
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C., Hahne, A., Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Discrimination of word stress in early infant perception: Electrophysiological evidence. Cognitive Brain Research, 18(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2015). Auditory perceptual objects as generative models: Setting the stage for communication by sound. Brain and Language, 148, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Ylinen, S., Strelnikov, K., Huotilainen, M., & Näätänen, R. (2009). Effects of prosodic familiarity on the automatic processing of words in the human brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 73(3), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.05.013
   Google Scholar